:Thanks. I wish I deserved it but thank you all the same. [[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] ([[User talk:Kumioko#top|talk]]) 17:55, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
:Thanks. I wish I deserved it but thank you all the same. [[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] ([[User talk:Kumioko#top|talk]]) 17:55, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
::You do deserve it, just because other people disagree with your actions, I have [[WP:AGF|faith]] that your actions were in the best interest of the editing community. I only wish others would have the same faith in me when I edit in certain articles.--[[User:RightCowLeftCoast|RightCowLeftCoast]] ([[User talk:RightCowLeftCoast|talk]]) 22:09, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
Revision as of 22:09, 21 January 2013
SEMI-RETIRED
This user is no longer very active on Wikipedia.
In the near future I may not be checking my talk page as much. For important or urgent matters it might be faster to send me an Email.
All that's going to happen is RF is going to get dumped on even more and you end up being sanctioned for disruption. NE Ent 12:53, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
The only way Rich gets back into the community is if he decides to get on board with the collaborative nature of WP. If it wasn't Fram it'd just be someone else, sooner or later. NE Ent12:54, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I see you closed it already. No biggie I am going to keep gathering my links and evidence. It will come up again eventually so I'll just submit it then. Kumioko (talk) 13:02, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict)Look at the numbers -- within minutes of opening the ANI thread you've got five strong opposes and zero support. It's not going to happen. You know I thought the AC sanction was stupid -- I said so at the time -- but everyone's just fed up with the drama and Rich's pushing the envelope; you're not doing him any favors by raising the issue at ANI. NE Ent13:05, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You know I think its funny. I have seen a lot of folks say they think its stupid. I've seen a lot of discussions about how Arbom is bad and yet, no one has the guts to do anything about either. My core problem in this really is not Rich's block. He's a big boy and he brought a lot of that on himself. My problem is with how the case was handled, with the wording of the decisions and how its being enforced through a constant stream of harassment from one or 2 users. It pisses me off even more seeing how the community supports it. Rich had his problems but the majority of his case is built around his performing minor edits. It wasn't the mistakes, it wasn't a violation of admin tools use, it was because he was doing edits that some think are minor. It is absolutely ridiculous. And people say I am an asshole! I just don't like seeing bullies be allowed to do whatever they want because they are clever enough to make attacks look useful. Kumioko (talk) 13:11, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You do deserve it, just because other people disagree with your actions, I have faith that your actions were in the best interest of the editing community. I only wish others would have the same faith in me when I edit in certain articles.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 22:09, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]