User talk:N0n3up: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by 31.50.150.116 - "" |
Warning: Edit warring on Pier Paolo Pasolini. (TW) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
==Re: Pier Paolo Pasolini== |
==Re: Pier Paolo Pasolini== |
||
you are the one vandalising, you have not once given a reason for you constant removal of salo as a notable work <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/31.50.150.116|31.50.150.116]] ([[User talk:31.50.150.116|talk]]) 03:47, 1 October 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
you are the one vandalising, you have not once given a reason for you constant removal of salo as a notable work <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/31.50.150.116|31.50.150.116]] ([[User talk:31.50.150.116|talk]]) 03:47, 1 October 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
== October 2013 == |
|||
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, and [[Wikipedia:Introduction|welcome to Wikipedia]]. You appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]] with one or more editors  according to your reverts at [[:Pier Paolo Pasolini]]. Although repeatedly [[Help:Reverting|reverting or undoing]] another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the [[Wikipedia:Editing policy|normal editing process]], and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] on the [[Help:Talk pages|talk page]]. |
|||
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the [[WP:3RR|three-revert rule]], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|block]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> ''also, users do not need to be registered to edit. |
|||
'' -- [[user:aunva6|Aunva6]]<sup>[[user talk:aunva6|talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Aunva6|contribs]]</sup> 16:27, 1 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 16:27, 1 October 2013
Talk Page N0n3up
User page.
Your request on my page
Hi, N0n3up! Welcome to Wikipedia. How can I help you? I notice that you're currently edit warring with User:BilCat on Americans with regard to the religion/ethnicity of Einstein. Is that what you're worried about?
I have to say, I don't quite understand your view there. Your note on the article talkpage is very short and general, and you don't offer any sources for what you say. Considering that the article Albert Einstein contradicts your claim that Einstein was a Jew "religiously", you really need to offer some evidence for your view. I note from Albert Einstein that Albert's parents were non-observant Jews, that he went to a Catholic elementary school, and that he's in the category Category:Jewish agnostics (plus various other kinds of agnostics). What's your basis for saying he was a Jew "religiously"? Did you notice that BilCat referred you, in an edit summary, to "his bio article" (i.e. Albert Einstein) and sources there? (N.b., please don't edit war.) Bishonen | talk 13:14, 30 September 2013 (UTC).
Re: Pier Paolo Pasolini
you are the one vandalising, you have not once given a reason for you constant removal of salo as a notable work — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.50.150.116 (talk) 03:47, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
October 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Pier Paolo Pasolini. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. also, users do not need to be registered to edit. -- Aunva6talk - contribs 16:27, 1 October 2013 (UTC)