Talk:Huqúqu'lláh: Difference between revisions
Magioladitis (talk | contribs) m expanding WikiProject Bahá'í Faith to make it readable, replaced: WPBF| → WikiProject Bahá'í Faith| using AWB |
→Recent reverts: new section |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
I have tried to include the [[Timeline of the institution of Huqúqu'lláh]] as a section inside this article, but I couldn't avoid the sections below it from wrapping around it. Could someone help? Please feel free to improve the timeline as well. Could a separate category 'Bahá'í timelines' be created? [[User:Wiki-uk|Wiki-uk]] ([[User talk:Wiki-uk|talk]]) 18:11, 8 January 2010 (UTC) |
I have tried to include the [[Timeline of the institution of Huqúqu'lláh]] as a section inside this article, but I couldn't avoid the sections below it from wrapping around it. Could someone help? Please feel free to improve the timeline as well. Could a separate category 'Bahá'í timelines' be created? [[User:Wiki-uk|Wiki-uk]] ([[User talk:Wiki-uk|talk]]) 18:11, 8 January 2010 (UTC) |
||
== Recent reverts == |
|||
I have to say I agree with Smkolins in his reverts. The policy on [[WP:RS]] clearly favours recent secondary sources, and you've been removing citations from reputable secondary sources, and including citations from primary sources, one of which has been noted in secondary sources to be not reliable. Regards, -- 03:42, 10 January 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:42, 10 January 2014
Bahá'í Faith Start‑class | ||||||||||
|
Definite article
Looking through the Writings and texts from various sources, it seems that Huqúqu'lláh is rarely referred to as "the Huqúqu'lláh" - just "Huqúqu'lláh" (unless it's being used as an adjective, i.e. "the Huqúqu'lláh fund", "the Huqúqu'lláh payment", etc.). The original Arabic doesn't use the definite article either. Would anyone object to me revising the usage here? I just want to make sure I don't change something that was done purposefully. Keldan 02:16, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
- I didn't write this article, but I think you are right. -- Jeff3000 02:17, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
- I did write this article, and I have no idea what is the correct usage. I think you're right. Cuñado - Talk 08:05, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
Baha'i Box?
Would it be appropriate to add the box marker {{Bahá'í}} to the this article since it certainly relates to the Bahá'í Faith? Leif (talk) 19:17, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
Timeline
I have tried to include the Timeline of the institution of Huqúqu'lláh as a section inside this article, but I couldn't avoid the sections below it from wrapping around it. Could someone help? Please feel free to improve the timeline as well. Could a separate category 'Bahá'í timelines' be created? Wiki-uk (talk) 18:11, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Recent reverts
I have to say I agree with Smkolins in his reverts. The policy on WP:RS clearly favours recent secondary sources, and you've been removing citations from reputable secondary sources, and including citations from primary sources, one of which has been noted in secondary sources to be not reliable. Regards, -- 03:42, 10 January 2014 (UTC)