User talk:Ritchie333

Hi Re Article on Yogacharya Tapan Bose

Hi There Ritchie,

I added some references and yet have not seen article approved.

Please check article:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Kriya_Yoga_Guru_Yogacharya_Tapan_Bose

Perhaps you can help edit it a bit. I made the changes needed and gave citations too.

If there are tiny issues you have my permission to make the appropriate semantic and form changes.

Thanks

LAKULISH — Preceding unsigned comment added by LAKULISH (talk • contribs) 08:38, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Your article wasn't submitted in the queue. I've now done this, so hopefully somebody will take a look at it soon. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 08:43, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi Ritchie,

Thanks for doing. Would you be able to check the status of the article. See if has been approved for publication. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by LAKULISH (talk • contribs) 14:21, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

A Tesla Roadster for you!

	A Tesla Roadster for you!
	Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! Gg53000 (talk) 00:08, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

FYI

A proposal has been made to create a Live Feed to enhance the processing of Articles for Creation and Drafts. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/RfC to create a 'Special:NewDraftsFeed' system. Your comments are welcome. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:20, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Abbey Road, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Magic Christian and Because (song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

• You need to stop linking to the Dab solver, as it doesn't work now replication on toolserver has been turned off. Do I have to report you on ANI for disruptive behaviour? :-P Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 11:27, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Yoko Ono

Did you even see that I was still working on it and asked for your help?--Aichik (talk) 17:43, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

• I did, but the BLP violations and lack of sources are unfortunately are a showstopper, I'm afraid, and they're not generally things you can fix quickly and expediently. A "not listed" (I don't like the term "fail" as it implies your efforts were substandard, which they weren't) means that the article cannot be listed as a GA at this time, and indeed I hope it will pass at a later date. I would follow the recommendations laid out in the review. The Wikipedia:Good article reassessment page gives you some other options you can consider, such as opening a community reassessment or requesting a second review. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 17:50, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Comment required

Hey Ritchie, how's work going? Listen, if you have some spare time, would you provide some input over the GAN review for Thirty Seconds to Mars? There are a few unresolved notes remaining (listed at the bottom of the page) and I'd appreciate if you share your opinion whether they should be addressed or not. Also, a suggestion whether the article should be promoted would be helpful. Thanks and everything the best.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 21:19, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

• Hi, I have dropped a second opinion on the GA review page. I would recommend going with my suggestions and passing - I haven't look at the article thoroughly but it doesn't have any obvious issues. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 21:58, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

re Abbey Road & Mac

Hey Ritchie, how are you? (I figured I'd reply over here rather than clutter GabeMc's talk page.)

And sorry, I meant to drop in at that Albums discussion after messaging with Gabe – but I managed to unearth precisely nothing that would've been helpful, so I didn't bother! Great job getting Abbey Road up at GAN, it's long overdue. I'm sure the nom will get snapped up by a reviewer any day now.

Thanks for the compliment about McCartney. Funny situation with that one, because I only came to the article while trying to help Yeepsi with Ram since, at the time, my head was filled with all things Apple/Beatles break-up, after working on song articles like Sue Me, Sue You Blues, Run of the Mill, Early 1970, etc. With Ram, it needed (needs) so much in the way of background and context, but it seemed to me that much of this had to link back to a similar section under McCartney. (In that, events of early and mid 1970 had such an obvious bearing on those of late 1970/early '71, when Mac sued the others.) So I head to McCartney instead, where I realise that much of that album's background, particularly regarding its release and reception, needed to link to/flow on from a more-dedicated discussion within Break-up of the Beatles. Then I get to that article and see that there's precious little about McCartney's role in breaking up the Beatles, relative to the massive amount of commentary and analysis that his actions over 1970–71 attracts in all the sources I have. So I got a bit stumped(!), because all I'd intended to do was help expand Ram for a shot at GAN, yet the whole exercise revealed how inadequate (imo) the coverage is further up the chain. The upshot was that McCartney, the article in the middle of the two extremes (Break-up of the Beatles vs Ram), ended up sort of okay – with your encouragement now, I just might revisit it after all.

Sorry to go on! … Best, JG66 (talk) 05:45, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Well I think we concluded that the unsourced figures were not a showstopper for GAN, so they've been taken out. I normally find there's about 2-3 month waiting list for GA nominations, but since Abbey Road is bit higher profile it might get attention sooner. As you suggest, Beatles sources don't really document much about McCartney making the first album, so much as the reaction to its release which ran parallel with the Beatles' official break-up. The article also gives good credit to Linda's photography, which isn't really remembered too much these days. I've added a bit to the article myself, but there's not really too much more work that's needed to take it to GA status. Keep it up! Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 13:05, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Abbey Road, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Medley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Reel-to-reel audio tape recording may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[File:Sonora-r2r.jpg|thumb|left|A typical home reel-to-reel tape recorder, this one made by Sonora.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:10, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Nobody likes a smart arse, BracketBot. Particularly when you can't fix the problem, merely whinge about it. :-P Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 17:14, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Caravan (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Geoffrey Richardson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

GA nomination of Shades of Deep Purple

I published the first revision of the article following your suggestions. There are a few points that need discussion in the Background and Touring sections.[1] I'm waiting for your input after a second check of the article. Thanks Lewismaster (talk) 06:56, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

I've looked through your comments and replied where appropriate. Hope there's enough to go on with that. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 10:52, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Your recent add to Yoko Ono

Thanks for the add on Julian, that was needed. On the other hand, I take issue with the way the Relationship to the Beatles section starts now with your blaming Ono for being present at the Beatles recording sessions. It regurgitates the stereotype of Ono as the dominant dragon lady in the relationship whereas we really don't know who was dominant as neither of us are them. I'll cite the People article that's used to reference a few other things in the article: It quotes Kyoko as saying "Lennon was always 'nice to me,' she describes him as 'this consuming force. He wanted all of my mom.' --Aichik (talk) 19:32, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

All I wanted to say was that her constant presence in the studio was a significant departure from established practices (and I don't see any accounts of Jane Asher, Patti Boyd or Maureen Starkey setting up camp in Abbey Road Studios so it is significant). Personally I don't think Ono had any intention of deliberately breaking up the Beatles, she just sort of indirectly contributed to it by being in the way. And if the "stereotype" is mentioned in multiple, independent, reliable sources, it ought to have consideration to go on the article. Perhaps this conversation should continue on Talk:Yoko Ono? Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 19:46, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on changes to the AfC mailing list

Hello Ritchie333! There is a discussion that your input is requested on! I look forward to your comments, thoughts, opinions, criticisms, and questions!

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.

This message was composed and sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(t • e • c)} 18:18, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mellotron

Just like a Routemaster bus, you wait weeks and weeks for a GA review and then three turn up at once!

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mellotron you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- Seabuckthorn (talk) 03:30, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rhodes piano

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rhodes piano you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- Seabuckthorn (talk) 03:30, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Abbey Road

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Abbey Road you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- Seabuckthorn (talk) 03:30, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rhodes piano

The article Rhodes piano you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rhodes piano for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- Seabuckthorn (talk) 23:02, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mellotron

The article Mellotron you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mellotron for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- Seabuckthorn (talk) 23:22, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Abbey Road

The article Abbey Road you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Abbey Road for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- Seabuckthorn (talk) 23:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

A brownie for you!

A brownie to you for reviewing at least 15 submissions during the WikiProject Articles for creation December 2013 - January 2014 Backlog Elimination Drive. Thanks for contributing to the backlog elimination drive! Posted by Northamerica1000 (talk) on 10:25, 26 February 2014 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation

Paco de Lucia

I'm almost in tears. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:16, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Sorry to hear that. Wonderful nylon guitar playing - I'll have to give him a spin on my radio show at some point. Maybe he can now get together and jam with Davey Graham? Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 14:20, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Caravan (band) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Miles Copeland and Cunning Stunts

Ultra Rare Trax (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Rome Convention

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK

Hi Ritchie, well done on the Abbey Road GA. If you add people to the DYK parameter, such as here, it's best to add their name into the parameter used for the bot to give credits, which is in the page in hidden text, like this: * {{DYKmake|Abbey Road|Ritchie333}}. I think one needs to be filled in for each credited editor. Thanks, Matty.007 17:54, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Articles for creation March 2014 Backlog Elimination Drive

Hello Ritchie333:

WikiProject AFC is holding a month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from March 1, 2014 to March 31, 2014.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1400 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script has been released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code enhancements, and more. If you want to see a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks.
Posted by Northamerica1000 (talk) on 02:12, 28 February 2014 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation

DYK for Abbey Road

Orlady (talk) 06:17, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Ultra Rare Trax

Hello! Your submission of Ultra Rare Trax at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 13:39, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Editor review#RfC: Should we mark WP:ER as historical?

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Editor review#RfC: Should we mark WP:ER as historical?. As you have participated in discussions about this before, you may be interested in the current RfC discussing closing and marking ER as historical. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 02:57, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Ultra Rare Trax

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 08:02, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Egg

Hello Ritchie. Thanks for taking Egg, unfortunately I'm unable to fix the issues as things keep popping up IRL and I'm not able to edit wiki as much at the current point in time. Best, yeepsi (Talk tonight) 15:19, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Okay, let me ping JG66 (again!) who commented on the GA review to see if he's happy tackling it. It would be a shame to fail a GA just because one editor has a lot going on, and I have most certainly been in that position myself. Have fun! Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 16:06, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		For your extraordinary hard work, care and precision in your contributions, I award you this accolade. Your intense passion for your interests is surely influential. It's been a pleasure and a privilege to be learning from you. Thank you very much for your service to Wikipedia. Seabuckthorn ♥ 22:56, 4 March 2014 (UTC)