Markham Colliery disaster: Difference between revisions
→External links: : Deleted redundant categories |
clean up, typo(s) fixed: , → , , a emergency → an emergency using AWB |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
== Accident investigation using fracture mechanics == |
== Accident investigation using fracture mechanics == |
||
===Background=== |
===Background=== |
||
The main part of the set up is the winding motor which is driven by the dc motor. Two double deck cages are attached to the two ends of the winding rope. At the start of the winding cycle, power applied to winding motor is gradually increased and mechanical brake released. The cages accelerate then maintain a speed of {{convert| 6|m/s|ft/s|0}} until the cages approach the ends of the shaft. During deceleration, generator voltage driving the winding motor is reduced to produce [[regenerative braking]] and it is finally brought to rest by a mechanical brake. |
The main part of the set up is the winding motor which is driven by the dc motor. Two double deck cages are attached to the two ends of the winding rope. At the start of the winding cycle, power applied to winding motor is gradually increased and mechanical brake released. The cages accelerate then maintain a speed of {{convert| 6|m/s|ft/s|0}} until the cages approach the ends of the shaft. During deceleration, generator voltage driving the winding motor is reduced to produce [[regenerative braking]] and it is finally brought to rest by a mechanical brake. |
||
| Line 13: | Line 14: | ||
Mechanical brake consists of a pair of [[brake shoes]] applied to the underside of the brake paths by the action of the compressed spring nest operating through a system of levers. Force is transmitted from the spring nest to main lever through a {{convert|2|in|mm|abbr=on|0}} diameter steel rod {{convert|8|ft| 11.875|in|m|3}} long.<ref>Demaid, A.P.A and Lawley, A., “The Markham Mine Disaster”, Case Histories Involving Fatigue and Fracture Mechanics, ASTM STP 918, C.M. Hudson and T.P.Rich, Eds., American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1986, pp. 389-416</ref> This vertical brake rod is always in tension as the springs are compressed. It also consists of a servospring mechanism which uses the compressed air to counteract the spring force to move the brake shoes away. |
Mechanical brake consists of a pair of [[brake shoes]] applied to the underside of the brake paths by the action of the compressed spring nest operating through a system of levers. Force is transmitted from the spring nest to main lever through a {{convert|2|in|mm|abbr=on|0}} diameter steel rod {{convert|8|ft| 11.875|in|m|3}} long.<ref>Demaid, A.P.A and Lawley, A., “The Markham Mine Disaster”, Case Histories Involving Fatigue and Fracture Mechanics, ASTM STP 918, C.M. Hudson and T.P.Rich, Eds., American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1986, pp. 389-416</ref> This vertical brake rod is always in tension as the springs are compressed. It also consists of a servospring mechanism which uses the compressed air to counteract the spring force to move the brake shoes away. |
||
For the sake of safety there is an automatic controller which cut off the power supply to winder motor and applies mechanical brake. Also there is |
For the sake of safety there is an automatic controller which cut off the power supply to winder motor and applies mechanical brake. Also there is an emergency stop button which activates the ‘ungabbling gear’ which disengages brake control lever from Iversen type valve and applies mechanical brake. |
||
===Accident=== |
===Accident=== |
||
On Monday, 30 July 1973 the winding engine man noticed some sparks under the brake cylinder when he started to retard the winding. He immediately increased regenerative braking and simultaneously pulled the brake lever to ON position. As there was no effect |
On Monday, 30 July 1973 the winding engine man noticed some sparks under the brake cylinder when he started to retard the winding. He immediately increased regenerative braking and simultaneously pulled the brake lever to ON position. As there was no effect, he pressed the emergency stop button. This too had no effect and the cage crashed the bottom wooden landing baulks with enormous force which killed 18 and seriously injured 11 people. |
||
===Investigation=== |
===Investigation=== |
||
| Line 23: | Line 24: | ||
All electrical and mechanical components of the winding system were thoroughly investigated to find the cause of accident. Electrical systems were found to be working as supply of compressed air was available above the servo cylinder. However the brake shoes were about {{convert|3| mm|in|disp=flip|2}} clear of the brake paths as the vertical brake rod had broken into two pieces. So the investigation concentrated on the failure of the brake rod. |
All electrical and mechanical components of the winding system were thoroughly investigated to find the cause of accident. Electrical systems were found to be working as supply of compressed air was available above the servo cylinder. However the brake shoes were about {{convert|3| mm|in|disp=flip|2}} clear of the brake paths as the vertical brake rod had broken into two pieces. So the investigation concentrated on the failure of the brake rod. |
||
A chemical analysis proved that the material of the brake rod (carbon steel with the designation '''''En8''''', conforming to British Standard 970:1947)<ref>Accident at Markham Colliery Derbyshire, by J.W.CALDER,C.B.,O.B.E.,B.Sc.,C.Eng.,F.I.Min.E.</ref> was within the specification demanded at the time of manufacture. |
A chemical analysis proved that the material of the brake rod (carbon steel with the designation '''''En8''''', conforming to British Standard 970:1947)<ref>Accident at Markham Colliery Derbyshire, by J.W.CALDER,C.B.,O.B.E.,B.Sc.,C.Eng.,F.I.Min.E.</ref> was within the specification demanded at the time of manufacture. |
||
Metallurgical examination of the brake rod showed that it failed because of fatigue. There were many secondary cracks around the fracture surface which were detected by magnetic particle technique. To investigate fatigue failure it was necessary to determine the in{{nbhyph}}service loading of the brake rod. |
Metallurgical examination of the brake rod showed that it failed because of fatigue. There were many secondary cracks around the fracture surface which were detected by magnetic particle technique. To investigate fatigue failure it was necessary to determine the in{{nbhyph}}service loading of the brake rod. |
||
| Line 43: | Line 44: | ||
==External links== |
==External links== |
||
* [http://www.dmm2.org.uk/uknames/u1973-01.htm List of miners killed in 1973] |
* [http://www.dmm2.org.uk/uknames/u1973-01.htm List of miners killed in 1973] |
||
* [http://www.dmm2.org.uk/uknames/5557-01.htm Text of report on 1973 disaster] |
* [http://www.dmm2.org.uk/uknames/5557-01.htm Text of report on 1973 disaster] |
||
Revision as of 20:11, 12 April 2014
On July 31, 1973, 18 coal miners lost their lives and a further 11 were seriously injured in a mining accident at the Markham Colliery at Staveley near Chesterfield, Derbyshire, England.
Accident in 1973
A descending cage carrying the men failed to slow down as it approached the bottom of the mine shaft and 18 miners were killed by the impact. The accident was caused by fracture of the brake-rod, when a slowly growing fatigue crack reached a critical size and the brake-rod parted.
Following a thorough investigation it was found that metal fatigue failure occurred in the braking mechanism used to slow down the cage as it descended.
Accident investigation using fracture mechanics
Background
The main part of the set up is the winding motor which is driven by the dc motor. Two double deck cages are attached to the two ends of the winding rope. At the start of the winding cycle, power applied to winding motor is gradually increased and mechanical brake released. The cages accelerate then maintain a speed of 6 metres per second (20 ft/s) until the cages approach the ends of the shaft. During deceleration, generator voltage driving the winding motor is reduced to produce regenerative braking and it is finally brought to rest by a mechanical brake.
Mechanical brake consists of a pair of brake shoes applied to the underside of the brake paths by the action of the compressed spring nest operating through a system of levers. Force is transmitted from the spring nest to main lever through a 2 in (51 mm) diameter steel rod 8 feet 11.875 inches (2.740 m) long.[1] This vertical brake rod is always in tension as the springs are compressed. It also consists of a servospring mechanism which uses the compressed air to counteract the spring force to move the brake shoes away.
For the sake of safety there is an automatic controller which cut off the power supply to winder motor and applies mechanical brake. Also there is an emergency stop button which activates the ‘ungabbling gear’ which disengages brake control lever from Iversen type valve and applies mechanical brake.
Accident
On Monday, 30 July 1973 the winding engine man noticed some sparks under the brake cylinder when he started to retard the winding. He immediately increased regenerative braking and simultaneously pulled the brake lever to ON position. As there was no effect, he pressed the emergency stop button. This too had no effect and the cage crashed the bottom wooden landing baulks with enormous force which killed 18 and seriously injured 11 people.
Investigation
All electrical and mechanical components of the winding system were thoroughly investigated to find the cause of accident. Electrical systems were found to be working as supply of compressed air was available above the servo cylinder. However the brake shoes were about 0.12 inches (3 mm) clear of the brake paths as the vertical brake rod had broken into two pieces. So the investigation concentrated on the failure of the brake rod.
A chemical analysis proved that the material of the brake rod (carbon steel with the designation En8, conforming to British Standard 970:1947)[2] was within the specification demanded at the time of manufacture.
Metallurgical examination of the brake rod showed that it failed because of fatigue. There were many secondary cracks around the fracture surface which were detected by magnetic particle technique. To investigate fatigue failure it was necessary to determine the in‑service loading of the brake rod.
The broken rod was replaced with a new rod and loading conditions were applied. Four strain gauges were attached at a distance of 21 inches (533 mm) from the lower end, located 90 degrees apart around the circumference of the rod. Readings were taken during manual release and application of the brake and during emergency application of brake. The results showed that in addition to the expected direct tensile stresses at gauge positions there were substantial stresses due to bending when the brake was operated. The magnitude of stresses varied to such an extent that for the one farthest from the drum there was a change from tension to compression as the brake was released. The rod was not designed for such alternating bending loads. The rod was designed with a factor of safety 6.1 for tensile stress. But when alternative bending stress are induced, failure was inevitable.
It was also found that mild steel bearing pad surfaces were badly worn as lubrication was not effective at bearings. This was also due to the unexpected bending stress which progressively squeezed the lubricant out of the gap.
Underground explosion in 1938
This was the second major disaster at the colliery: an underground explosion in 1938 had killed 79 miners and seriously injured 40 others.
Closure of Mine
The mine closed in 1994.
References
- ^ Demaid, A.P.A and Lawley, A., “The Markham Mine Disaster”, Case Histories Involving Fatigue and Fracture Mechanics, ASTM STP 918, C.M. Hudson and T.P.Rich, Eds., American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1986, pp. 389-416
- ^ Accident at Markham Colliery Derbyshire, by J.W.CALDER,C.B.,O.B.E.,B.Sc.,C.Eng.,F.I.Min.E.