User talk:IndianBio

Priyanka Chopra's discography Thanx so much for reviewing my edit on Priyanka Chopra's discography. But I wonder why just deleted all the info. I added so much new relevant and updated info. It seems kinda weird dat you just deleted the whole page with a notification that it is unnecessary... After she will release her album (in the nearby future) I would say that it IS interesting to create an own page for her discography!. Please feedback why you did it. And what your vision is on all of this. I'm a great PRiyanka fan myself. And to be honest I was really proud the 5 hour work I spend on making that page... Thanx in advance. :-) Robinhio84 (talk • contribs) 10:56, 3 June 2014 (UTC) She is not yet an established singer. So far, all the songs she sang have received mixed reviews, that may stop her from continuing her singing career. Until she releases at least 3 studio albums, let her not have a discography article. And you Robinhio84 seem to have been here on Wikipedia since 2009, but have you learnt anything yet? Kailash29792 (talk) 11:35, 3 June 2014 (UTC) @Robinhio84:, Kailash29792 explained the reasoning to you perfectly. Chopra is not an established singer and neither has any proof that she would be one. Creating a separate discography page at this point is violating the WP:UNDUE as well as WP:CRYSTAL policies of Wikipedia. Suggest you go through them once. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 11:50, 3 June 2014 (UTC) A cookie for you! Thank you for your thorough and continuing contributions to the List of best-selling singles in the United States. Your help in improving the list is much appreciated! Mαuri’96 “everything and nothing always haunts me…” 22:35, 19 May 2014 (UTC) Shut Up and Drive (Rihanna song) Hey Bio, can you weight your opinion on this discussion? Thanks! — Tomíca(T2ME) 22:09, 20 May 2014 (UTC) Your GA nomination of Do What U Want The article Do What U Want you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Do What U Want for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Petergriffin9901 -- Petergriffin9901 (talk) 10:21, 22 May 2014 (UTC) Like Congrats! --Another Believer (Talk) 17:30, 22 May 2014 (UTC) GUY Page Just to let you know, I already reported your constant reverts on GUY page based on your personal and biased opinion and you breaking the 3 reverts rule today. Bye! Wonderful, I'm so happy. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 15:59, 22 May 2014 (UTC) A kitten for you! Sorry for our differences in the past!!! Friends? 😓 Shane Cyrus (talk) 14:58, 23 May 2014 (UTC) Lol. Why don't you start by congratulating him on his new GA? ;)--PeterGriffin • Talk2Me 15:01, 23 May 2014 (UTC) Thanks 4 getting my fav lady gaga song ga.. Sorry, I couldn't assist!! --Shane Cyrus (talk) 15:11, 23 May 2014 (UTC) 😊😊😊😊 Thanks Shane, nice kitty. And lol Nathan, you little devil. :P —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 17:28, 23 May 2014 (UTC) Critical reception watch You may want to watch the section because some editor thinks that it is premature to have this section included as part of Me. I Am Mariah... The Elusive Chanteuse.HotHat (talk) 23:29, 23 May 2014 (UTC) 100% premature. 100% poorly written and copy and paste prose.--PeterGriffin • Talk2Me 01:39, 24 May 2014 (UTC) 100% done before on Wikipedia. I said fix the prose if you do not like the wording that I utilized. I summed up the sources and just used the most pertinent parts for the quotes. It is not a QUOTEFARM. She has already released the album on iTunes Radio for a pre-sale marketing gimmick to sell more albums, so I don't see why not tell people what the most noteworthy review sites are saying on the music's merit.HotHat (talk) 03:10, 24 May 2014 (UTC) I still don't get what is the issue. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 06:16, 24 May 2014 (UTC) Honestly mate. Just ignore it. I still don't get what this one's on about..--PeterGriffin • Talk2Me 06:56, 24 May 2014 (UTC) Critical reception should be added right? So that's how it is. And the article is shaping up pretty good pre-charting info I think. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 07:00, 24 May 2014 (UTC) "Bad Romance" On the history page for "Bad Romance" you queried why there were so many wikichanges at one point a few days ago. Just to let you know, I tried to repair a broken link in a footnote and got into a tangle, which the Help Desk helped to sort out. I have steered clear of the footnotes since then! -- P123ct1 (talk) 13:22, 27 May 2014 (UTC) Thanks for explaining, I was worried what exactly was going on with your edits. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 13:32, 27 May 2014 (UTC) My other edits are copy-edits as you will have seen. I am not very experienced at handling the technical side of Wiki editing yet (the wikicode, tools, etc), so will not attempt to rectify any more footnotes. I have noticed some more broken links; should I make a note of these on the "Bad Romance" Talk page? -- P123ct1 (talk) 18:09, 27 May 2014 (UTC) Please do so P123ct1. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 03:11, 28 May 2014 (UTC) SPI note Hello, IndianBio. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Reece Leonard. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. He's persistent, I'll give him that. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 13:57, 27 May 2014 (UTC) WP:BRD The bold edit was hard-coding an image size, directly contravening WP:IMGSIZE. If the template has changed, and you don't like it, then discuss on the template talk page. We're not hard coding image sizes in hundreds of thousands of articles. --NeilN talk to me 12:00, 30 May 2014 (UTC) @NeilN:, it is not a question of me not liking the hardcoding. As you can see it was not me who added that hardcoding in the article. There are other articles also especially in the music area that have the hard coding now that the image size has suddenly been altered. I would very much like to know the reason though. I'm on my way there posting. You also come and join. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 12:03, 30 May 2014 (UTC) So why did you quote WP:BRD at the article? Articles should stay the same until it is determined why the template changed. Do you have a link to the template change diff? --NeilN talk to me 12:07, 30 May 2014 (UTC) @NeilN: I'm not sure where the template codes are kept, I'm not very good at recognizing the jargon. I have left a post at the template talk page hoping one of the editors will reply and show us if it was an universally accepted change. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 12:10, 30 May 2014 (UTC) The last change to that template was done on March 6th so the change is somewhere else. --NeilN talk to me 12:16, 30 May 2014 (UTC) I'm pretty sure the code is not kept at {{Infobox person}} page, and the change is in the page where the code has been developed. This is just a transclusion of it. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 12:18, 30 May 2014 (UTC) It's WMF-inflicted Wikipedia:VPT#Infobox_Image --NeilN talk to me 12:29, 30 May 2014 (UTC) Hmmmmm here's hoping they sort it out or rollback the new patches installed. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 12:46, 30 May 2014 (UTC) Frietjes tweaked the infobox. I manually purged the cache of the article you self-reverted on and the image is properly sized now. --NeilN talk to me 13:44, 30 May 2014 (UTC) Well, thanks for the reverts Neil! I'm glad the issue has been fixed. -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 01:21, 31 May 2014 (UTC) Matey I appreciate it mate. It seems few really notice the gravity of his foolishness. Thanks for having my back :)--PeterGriffin • Talk2Me 07:25, 31 May 2014 (UTC) @Petergriffin9901:, yeah talking and asking about whether 220 million is acceptable for an artist in a polite manner is one thing, but trying to troll with it and calling names and fan-wars is not something acceptable here. If he continues, bannville is where he would belong. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 07:35, 31 May 2014 (UTC) To indianBio, i hope you would understand I'm not doing any personal attack between editor, and what rules that i have break out regarding with word skinny and fat! because i'm telling that to the artist! Not personal attack between editor. remember that and keep in your mind, i believe my contribution to the list of best-selling artits is VERY HIGH!. and if you want to report me! go a head. It's your right but it's my right also to asking why?. thanks Politsi (talk) 15:55, 31 May 2014 (UTC) Because you are disrupting the professional environment that we accept here with your fanboy commentary. No one is interested in that. Either collaborate with respect and professionalism, else don't. Understood? —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 16:01, 31 May 2014 (UTC) Nope but thanks for remind me, and please look at this statement from Nathan in his talk-page when he/she said something about me 'I have you watch-listed so I can monitor your stupidity'. IndianBio... Did you understand and realize? who the real person who make a personal attack and violation?. please behave yourself before you warned someone. thanks Politsi (talk) 16:12, 31 May 2014 (UTC) I supported Nathan's statement, because guess what? You have been that. Now please be off from my talk page I have much more important stuff to do. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 16:17, 31 May 2014 (UTC) So you support someone to calling stupid between registered editor?. Very nice to know, and please do not give me a warning again, because you don't deserve doing that. Politsi (talk) 16:25, 31 May 2014 (UTC) Yes because next time it will be ANI. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 16:27, 31 May 2014 (UTC) Whatever. But please keep in your mind IndianBio..... I NEVER saying someone Stupid! especially between registered editor of wikipedia. Because that's the real violation (personal attack).Politsi (talk) 16:35, 31 May 2014 (UTC) Requesting an actual admin Are you an admin who is going to read what my complaints are for the edits or are you just going to scold me about my tone? If it's the latter, find me someone who will follow through and read my complaints, thanks DeadSend4 (talk) 10:26, 4 June 2014 (UTC) I have gone through all your ramblings, which incidentally, is not supported at all except for an archive link. But that does not give you any right to call others foul name and disrespect others opinions. And consensus leans towards keeping Mariah's picture, whether you like it or not. But you would not like to get blocked I'm sure, so I suggest you keep it cute and stop with the personal attacks, else this noticeboard is where it will get reported. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 10:28, 4 June 2014 (UTC) That wasn't my question DeadSend4 (talk) 10:30, 4 June 2014 (UTC) You calling them rambling shows you didn't even read anything, find me an actual admin who will read DeadSend4 (talk) 10:31, 4 June 2014 (UTC) You realize the article was fine for two years with those images and now it's being reverted because of ONE image. You also realize the article is too big and adding an additional image isn't going to help because we've been trying to downsize it for the past few months. Of course you don't, so find me and admin who will DeadSend4 (talk) 10:32, 4 June 2014 (UTC) No, you learn to treat people with respect, then maybe you will be taken seriously? I have no time for frivolity and yes, they were ramblings of an uncivil man. It holds no candle however the article was for two years. You support your claim that the picture is unncessaruy with valid inputs. You do not attack other editors calling them blind, idiots etc. That makes your case as strong as a prostitute seeking actions for rape. Get it? —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 10:34, 4 June 2014 (UTC) By the way, other users in that discussion said the works "shit" and "fuck" which I never mentioned myself, that and I was just called stupid. But I bet you're not going to pretend that you saw that,DeadSend4 (talk) 11:00, 4 June 2014 (UTC) Oh look another from the same editor: "Do I supposed to say that you are a true idiot?" Sorry, but I have to say that you are pure stupidity. Simon (talk) 10:37, 4 June 2014 (UTC) You how unfair this is, if you continue to ignore me I will be taking legal action I was just called a "twat" Not the YouTube links you twat, the 2 biographies on Aguilera (there are others but are not available for view online).--PeterGriffin • Talk2Me 11:00, 4 June 2014 (UTC) Another insult from the same editor: And stop acting like that, just proves you are a pure bastard.DeadSend4 (talk) 11:07, 4 June 2014 (UTC)