User talk:Petergriffin9901

If you have reason to leave a comment, question or suggestion, please click here and start a new section.

Thanks for stopping by. PS. I find it funny when editors address me as "Call Me Nathan". That's not the point! You're supposed to call me "Nathan".

If you feel that I have reverted an edit or issued a warning in error, please click here and let me know. I am human, and I do make mistakes. Please don't interpret an error on my part as a personal attack on you. It's not, I promise. I ask you to simply bring it to my attention; I am always open to civil discussion. Thank you.

Song article: "All I want for Christmas is you"

Hello Nathan- I'm Tom, aka Nuance 4 (my vocal jazz group). I'm a DJ at WMKV-FM 89.3 in Cincy.

Let me tell you of a frustration of mine: When someone writes a book, or a song, it is copyrighted to insure its intellectual property rights to the owner/creator. HOWEVER, under this law, the TITLE of the work is not protected, and someone else can create a completely new work, but legally use an old title. For example, "Band Of Brothers" can refer to several different books written over many decades. This means for someone seeking a specific work, he may have to eliminate several other ambiguous works with the same title.

It is for this reason that last January I added a short paragraph "Ambiguity" to "All I want for Christmas is you". If someone is looking for a cover version of Mariah Carey's song, he might accidentally buy the song Johnny Mandel wrote - since there is a Tony Bennett recording with the same (albeit erroneous) title. You decided this caveat was unnecessary and deleted it October 30. If you think it through, I ask you to reconsider this, since it can save a buyer some grief.

Let me know what you think.

Tom

Hi

Hello, I see you're a lambily, I'm contributing in spanish wikipedia, Mimi items are neglected, I ask your help. Danny toons

GAN

Hello, Petergriffin9901. You have new messages at Talk:Katy Perry/GA4.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 23:17, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

• The refs should be all good now for this California Gurl. I've added missing page numbers, too. Can the review now please proceed, Mr. Griffin? XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 01:26, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

• The One of the Boys section has had a thorough TNT now. Ready to proceed to the next section? XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 20:22, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

• Sorry to keep asking, Peter, but I really, really would like to proceed with the GAN. I'm willing to let the other co-nominators address any issues raised (in regard to "fresh eyes"), but I don't wanna have to keep waiting for this to finish. If you feel unable to complete the review, perhaps Вик Ретлхед could (at least temporarily) take over. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 10:50, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Help?

Hey, I am currently in the nomination process of getting Nicki Minaj videography up to featured list status. I am working through the improvements from user comments and have come to a slight hiccup. One of the problems is that there is different formatting for the references, and that some references do not contain all the nessessary information such as date, publisher exc. I have seen that you have contributed to getting many articles up to a sophisticated stage and was wondering whether you have any idea on how to format these references? without having to individually change every single one? If you could help in any way it would be appreciated. As a Mariah fan, I do not know your stance on Minaj, but if you could lend a hand I would be very thankful :P

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Nicki Minaj videography/archive1, KaneZolanski (talk) 10:13, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Status levels

I just fixed your editing status levels on your userpage, since you displayed them a while back. You have attained higher levels, and probably did not know that you did so.HotHat (talk) 06:22, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Nicki Minaj videography (Featured List candidate)

I think you might have listed Pills N Potions as a mistake. No, I certainly do not mind constructive criticism, one thing I am not is a seasoned editor. Well, any help you could give me would be appreciated. I've put the article through peer review, copy edit and now this. I understand that there are some basic errors and a ledge that isn't comprehensive in informative information regarding Minaj's total videography, but I'm willing to fix all problems in order to get this article up to standard. Thanks again KaneZolanski (talk) 13:13, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

I see, now i wish I made reference to the elusive chanteuse ;) Thanks, your help is appreciated. KaneZolanski (talk) 18:49, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

are you following me? or watching my talk page?

Because i like it to be honest. It means that you're paying attention on me. hehehe Politsi (talk) 05:33, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Yes. I have you watch-listed so I can monitor your stupidity.--PeterGriffin • Talk2Me 05:59, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Nathan, I have warned Politsi not to troll and cause WP:BLP violations. If he/she does it again let me know, this is straight going to ANI for topic banning. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 05:01, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

To indianBio... please look at this statement from Nathan I have you watch-listed so I can monitor your stupidity

IndianBio... Did you understand and realize? who the real person who make a personal attack and violation?. please behave yourself before you warned someone. thanks Politsi (talk) 16:08, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Have a seat dude. You've been creating fan wars for over a week already. Get it together before admins do it for you.--PeterGriffin • Talk2Me 23:12, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

HAHAHA....worthless? and nothing to be proud of?.... i dont have to tell you my contribution to the that list, ask yourself Nathan. And please be fair (be a man!), do NOT erase my comment in your page eventhough that's make you so shame. Politsi (talk) 03:43, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Nathan, You really need to cool your temper, Friend! I won't report you but nor are you allowed to call someone bafoon nor a troll. I am an idiot to not report this but seriously dude, think it over.--Shane Cyrus (talk) 04:59, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Nor are you allowed to take up 2 GA reviews at same time like you did w. Katy Perry and the Iggy Azalea song.--Shane Cyrus (talk) 05:04, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Users most certainly can take up multiple reviews at the same time. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 06:19, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

And speaking of reviews, you've got a new Barnstar Mr. Griffin :) XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 07:43, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Petergriffin9901. You have new messages at Talk:Work (Iggy Azalea song)/GA1.
Message added 06:21, 2 June 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

—CoolMarc 06:21, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

WP:ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Nathan this is customary to notify involved parties. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 11:32, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Christina Aguilera

Thanks for standing by my side at Talk:Christina Aguilera#Dispute. Harsh, we've wasted sooo much time arguing with that guy. But everything seems to be alright now Simon (talk) 11:49, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

@HĐ: Oh Lawd! Lol. Of course, and thank you for coming to my aid. I still cannot believe this dude after 3 hours still doesn't get it :S Alas, cheers again mate and let's be in touch with the article in coming days to see what happens. Cheers buddy :)--PeterGriffin • Talk2Me 11:53, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Fuck you cunts :) Love having the last word, bye! DeadSend4 (talk) 11:58, 4 June 2014 (UTC)