Jump to content

Talk:Peggy McIntosh: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 34: Line 34:


[[Special:Contributions/76.14.70.199|76.14.70.199]] ([[User talk:76.14.70.199|talk]]) 04:31, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
[[Special:Contributions/76.14.70.199|76.14.70.199]] ([[User talk:76.14.70.199|talk]]) 04:31, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

The use of "Band-Aids" instead of "bandage" shows how rife this article is with ignorance.

Revision as of 10:35, 12 November 2014

WikiProject iconBiography Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconFeminism Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

2007

More post-modernist rubbish if you ask me. Jmm6f488 03:31, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article is post-modernist? It looks like an ordinary stubby article to me. If you're commenting on McIntosh or her work, this really isn't the forum. --lquilter 20:15, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article in The New Yorker

Very interesting article in The New Yorker, but as I hadn't heard of McIntosh before, I don't know wheter it's useful here: The Woman Who Coined the Term “White Privilege”

this article is terrible...

I am writing something the touches on McIntosh's work...

I got say this page blows...I am not trying to hurt anyone's feelings but just look at the article!!!! One example to prove my point

"This film is great because it allows individuals to view this film and focus on their own internalized racism issues.[17] Through the discussion of racism within the borders of the film "Mirrors of Privilege: Making Whiteness Visible", Peggy McIntosh has found a way for people of color to not be discriminated in a discussion pertaining to racism. This film provides a paving mechanism for the interracial relations and have relationships between the racial divide"

the film is 'great'???

The whole article suffers from this and there are further copy edit issues worth fixing, that alone would make this article a lot better...It's just not up to wiki standards...

anyway i am hoping someone will see this post and do redo on this article, factually and referencially it's pretty good someone just needs to re write it a little more 'antiseptic' shall we say

good luck

76.14.70.199 (talk) 04:31, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The use of "Band-Aids" instead of "bandage" shows how rife this article is with ignorance.