Talk:Elder of Ziyon: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Normally, I'd say no. But I saw on the lede of the article that it says "The blog has been widely cited by many news organizations, including James Taranto of the Wall Street Journal[8], Israel HaYom[9], the Washington Times [10], and Tablet Magazine." So it is a rather famous blog. I mean generally we should try not to make articles just for blogs or people on YouTube, but if they're noteworthy enough, which I feel this is, then I don't see why a bit of information can't hurt. Just my own personal opinion, others may feel differently. |
:Normally, I'd say no. But I saw on the lede of the article that it says "The blog has been widely cited by many news organizations, including James Taranto of the Wall Street Journal[8], Israel HaYom[9], the Washington Times [10], and Tablet Magazine." So it is a rather famous blog. I mean generally we should try not to make articles just for blogs or people on YouTube, but if they're noteworthy enough, which I feel this is, then I don't see why a bit of information can't hurt. Just my own personal opinion, others may feel differently. |
||
:See here a [[List_of_blogs|List of Notable Blogs]] that have their own Wikipedia page. So yes, there are precedents for this type of stuff. No doubt this isn't on that level, but for people interested in the topic it may be noteworthy, and the blog does have a very high rating level on Technorati. --<small style="border: 1px dashed;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:Activism1234|<b><font color="teal">Activism</font></b>]][[User talk:Activism1234|<font color="darkred">1234</font>]]'''</small> 22:42, 23 July 2012 (UTC) |
:See here a [[List_of_blogs|List of Notable Blogs]] that have their own Wikipedia page. So yes, there are precedents for this type of stuff. No doubt this isn't on that level, but for people interested in the topic it may be noteworthy, and the blog does have a very high rating level on Technorati. --<small style="border: 1px dashed;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:Activism1234|<b><font color="teal">Activism</font></b>]][[User talk:Activism1234|<font color="darkred">1234</font>]]'''</small> 22:42, 23 July 2012 (UTC) |
||
== Vandalism and 1RR violation == |
|||
Removing everything on this article EXCEPT for a critical piece from an activist blog violates numerous wikipedia policies, including [[WP:VANDALISM]], [[WP:V]] and [[WP:NPOV]]. In addition , the most recent edit violated the 1RR restriction on all articles related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Please undo that edit forthwith. [[User:I invented "it's not you, it's me"|I invented "it's not you, it's me"]] ([[User talk:I invented "it's not you, it's me"|talk]]) 04:40, 8 March 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 04:40, 8 March 2015
Notable...ness?
This is but a blogspot blog. Does it really warrant it's own Wikipedia page? XK5Nkxn (talk) 22:38, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
- Normally, I'd say no. But I saw on the lede of the article that it says "The blog has been widely cited by many news organizations, including James Taranto of the Wall Street Journal[8], Israel HaYom[9], the Washington Times [10], and Tablet Magazine." So it is a rather famous blog. I mean generally we should try not to make articles just for blogs or people on YouTube, but if they're noteworthy enough, which I feel this is, then I don't see why a bit of information can't hurt. Just my own personal opinion, others may feel differently.
- See here a List of Notable Blogs that have their own Wikipedia page. So yes, there are precedents for this type of stuff. No doubt this isn't on that level, but for people interested in the topic it may be noteworthy, and the blog does have a very high rating level on Technorati. --Activism1234 22:42, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Vandalism and 1RR violation
Removing everything on this article EXCEPT for a critical piece from an activist blog violates numerous wikipedia policies, including WP:VANDALISM, WP:V and WP:NPOV. In addition , the most recent edit violated the 1RR restriction on all articles related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Please undo that edit forthwith. I invented "it's not you, it's me" (talk) 04:40, 8 March 2015 (UTC)