Jump to content

User talk:CosmicEmperor: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by Deadlystock (talk) to last revision by Nakon (HG)
No edit summary
Line 115: Line 115:


As the editor is not associated with the book or author, and never represented they were, they're allowed to use EatsShootsAndLeaves. It may be the case that the filters you encountered treating to create usernames were not active when they created their account. <small>[[User talk:NE Ent|NE Ent]]</small> 11:16, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
As the editor is not associated with the book or author, and never represented they were, they're allowed to use EatsShootsAndLeaves. It may be the case that the filters you encountered treating to create usernames were not active when they created their account. <small>[[User talk:NE Ent|NE Ent]]</small> 11:16, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

== You will be blocked ==

[[File:Information orange.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please do not add commentary or your own [[Wikipedia:No original research|personal analysis]] to Wikipedia articles, as you did to [[Atif Aslam]]. Doing so violates Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view policy]] and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. <!-- Template:Huggle/warn-npov-2 --><!-- Template:uw-npov2 -->[[User:IronGargoyle|IronGargoyle]] ([[User talk:IronGargoyle|talk]]) 19:17, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

[[File:ambox warning pn.svg|left|25px|alt=|link=]] Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalize]] Wikipedia, as you did at [[:Ali Zafar]], you may be [[WP:BLOCK|blocked from editing]].<br>Your edits have been '''automatically''' marked as [[WP:Vandalism|vandalism]] and have been '''automatically''' [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: [[Ali Zafar]] was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ali+Zafar&diff=601482951&oldid=601395930 changed] by [[Special:Contributions/BLACKIEHINDU|BLACKIEHINDU]] [[User:BLACKIEHINDU|(u)]] [[User talk:BLACKIEHINDU|(t)]] ANN scored at 0.951589 on 2014-03-27T09:36:13+00:00 <!-- MySQL ID: 1766455 -->. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-cluebotwarning3 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism3 --> [[User:ClueBot NG|ClueBot NG]] ([[User talk:ClueBot NG|talk]]) 09:36, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|left|30px|alt=|link=]] This is your '''last warning'''. If you [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalize]] Wikipedia again, as you did at [[:Atif Aslam]], you may be '''[[WP:BLOCK|blocked]] from editing without further notice'''.<br />Your edits have been '''automatically''' marked as [[WP:Vandalism|vandalism]] and have been '''automatically''' [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: [[Atif Aslam]] was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Atif+Aslam&diff=601483049&oldid=601396067 changed] by [[Special:Contributions/BLACKIEHINDU|BLACKIEHINDU]] [[User:BLACKIEHINDU|(u)]] [[User talk:BLACKIEHINDU|(t)]] ANN scored at 0.951726 on 2014-03-27T09:37:56+00:00 <!-- MySQL ID: 1766458 -->. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-cluebotwarning4 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism4 --> [[User:ClueBot NG|ClueBot NG]] ([[User talk:ClueBot NG|talk]]) 09:37, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' '''indefinitely''' from editing because your account is [[Wikipedia:Vandalism-only account|being used only for vandalism]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}. However, you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. &nbsp;&nbsp;—[[User:Smalljim|S<small>MALL</small>]][[User talk:Smalljim#top|<small>JIM</small>]]&nbsp; 09:41, 27 March 2014 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-voablock -->

Revision as of 03:37, 18 March 2015

Welcome!

Hello, CosmicEmperor! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! David Biddulph If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 06:12, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous


Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, CosmicEmperor. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 11:48, 22 January 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Some bubble tea for you!

The red heart at the top of user pages make you able to give some wiki love. It can be food, barnstars, kitten or even your own design. When the food thing started I do not know. Probably pretty early just like the barnstar thing started pretty early. I thought this was an easier answer to show you instead of posting back at the teahouse. NathanWubs (talk) 08:27, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for best image

If you click on the voting and it does not work. Then it might be your browser or you using an add-on that makes it not work. Have you tried a different browser that might fix the problem. If not you can always post a question at the teahouse again or the technical helpdesk I guess. Good luck at least. NathanWubs (talk) 20:17, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, CosmicEmperor. You have new messages at David Biddulph's talk page.
Message added 04:36, 29 January 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

{{helpme}}

When i try to revert/undo some old edits , the message appears that The edit could not be undone due to conflicting intermediate edits; if you wish to undo the change, it must be done manually. But I have seen other editors have no problem in reverting old edits . How do they do that .

You can see this edit from the page Baby(2015 film) [1]

(cur | prev) 03:28, 30 January 2015‎ Vaibhav.times (talk | contribs)‎ . . (17,241 bytes) (+620)‎ . . (Undid revision 644719523 by 112.79.39.165 (talk)- Valid Source and if you want to discuss on talk page) (undo | thank)

The user was able to revert an old edit.--Frost The World (talk) 04:17, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An undo is just a type of revert – a very limited form. A manual revert is done by going to a page history clicking on a revision, clicking edit this page, and then saving. See Help:Reverting. It is something of an unfortunate byproduct of the undo button (which is actually a rather recent feature), that I've noticed people not knowing how to do actual reverts.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 04:28, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help me

I know that a page can be created if it meets notability standards . But as I am a new user I am not aware of every rules . Can I find anybody who can create page for me . I can give him references. Its upto him how he creates and designs the page. Pallavi Purakayastha Murder Case was widely discussed in Indian media . Every details of the case was published in almost all leading newspapers and all English and Hindi news channels gave huge coverage to the murder case . There were lots of weekend columns where female writers discussed about safety of women in India after Pallavi was murdered by her watchman . As it happened in a posh locality and the witness was also dead due to natural reasons , the case got coverage . Even the conviction , sentence of the accused got coverage after few years of the murder. I am 100% confident that there must be a Wiki page about this Murder.--CosmicEmperor (talk) 10:16, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CosmicEmperor, if you want to create an article about this murder case, I would highly suggest going through the Article Wizard. This will create a draft, which will be reviewed by other Wikipedians to ensure that it is a high-quality article. It will also not be deleted unless there are copyright violations. If you do not want to write the article yourself, then I suggest going to the Requested Articles page, where you can put your references and the reason why you think it should be written. A volunteer may decide to write the article if it looks promising. If you want more help, stop by the Teahouse, the IRC channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 11:13, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help request

Every Administrator has their unique signature . the wiki page for signatures don't tell anybody how to create unique signature . There is a female editor who helped others to create signatures . I forgot her name. can I find anybody who will create unique signature for me. --CosmicEmperor (talk) 06:16, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The page explaining customization of signatures is WP:Signature. If you have specific questions on signature customization I'll gladly help, but in general, being a counterexample to the "every administrator has a custom signature" rule I consider a custom signature a very low priority and would advise you not to bother with something like that. It confers no benefits to editing. Huon (talk) 13:26, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note

I see you're a new user, so I decided to come talk to you. Yes, there are times that that usernames are declined for similarities to many things. That is not the case with User:EatsShootsAndLeaves. It is an alternate account to a Panda style name, and has a long history. They are aware of what you're pointing out. MANY people are aware - trust me. The editor is not currently active. And there are also some administrative concerns which I won't bore you with. I very strongly suggest that you undo your revert, as it could cause you problems that you wouldn't want to deal with. see also: WP:BRD. thank you. — Ched :  ?  08:00, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is so not a user name and doesn't conflict with the user name the editor has chosen, any more than mine does. There's no duplication or hidden meaning here. Thanks for your concern Dreadstar 08:24, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DangerousPanda and EatShootsAndLeaves are alternate accounts of the same editor who started editing in March 2006. DangerousPanda was an administrator until late last year when the Arbitration Committee agreed with some of us that they were not using the administrator rights in a manner consistent with Wikipedia principles, and had the administrator user access level removed. The editor ceased to contribute shortly there after. Out of respect for them many folks have their pages watch listed to ensure folks don't post taunting or disrespectful messages on it. That's why you're getting somewhat vague warning messages to stay away from there.

As the editor is not associated with the book or author, and never represented they were, they're allowed to use EatsShootsAndLeaves. It may be the case that the filters you encountered treating to create usernames were not active when they created their account. NE Ent 11:16, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You will be blocked

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Atif Aslam. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:17, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ali Zafar, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Ali Zafar was changed by BLACKIEHINDU (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951589 on 2014-03-27T09:36:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:36, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Atif Aslam, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Atif Aslam was changed by BLACKIEHINDU (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951726 on 2014-03-27T09:37:56+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:37, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.   —SMALLJIM  09:41, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]