User talk:KarlV: Difference between revisions
m →[[WP:POINT]]: tyops |
m →[[WP:POINT]]: typo fixed |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==[[WP:POINT]]== |
==[[WP:POINT]]== |
||
You have been blocked indefinitely for an egragious violation of [[WP:POINT]] concerning the article [[Bad Nenndorf]]. Wikipedia is not an experiment for you to play with. Your actions incited disruption and unneeded edit warring. The place where you admit that you used Wikipedia as an experiment is |
You have been blocked indefinitely for an egragious violation of [[WP:POINT]] concerning the article [[Bad Nenndorf]]. Wikipedia is not an experiment for you to play with. Your actions incited disruption and unneeded edit warring. The place where you admit that you used Wikipedia as an experiment is documented [http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diskussion:Bad_Nenndorf#Stellungnahme_von_KarlV_.2F_Statement_of_KarlV here]. [[User:pschemp|pschemp]] | [[User talk:pschemp|talk]] 21:47, 2 August 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:59, 2 August 2006
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. - Samsara (talk • contribs) 17:42, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Answer on the article discussion!--KarlV 19:56, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- You have been blocked for 24 hours for violation WP:3RR on Bad Nenndorf. This includes the edit you made as an IP. pschemp | talk 20:04, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
You have been blocked indefinitely for an egragious violation of WP:POINT concerning the article Bad Nenndorf. Wikipedia is not an experiment for you to play with. Your actions incited disruption and unneeded edit warring. The place where you admit that you used Wikipedia as an experiment is documented here. pschemp | talk 21:47, 2 August 2006 (UTC)