Jump to content

User talk:Tchadienne: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tchadienne (talk | contribs)
formatting
Tchadienne (talk | contribs)
"parting" gift. ;)
Line 1: Line 1:
Due to harassment I will once again be switching accounts. However, in order to keep on editing widely-neglected topics (Chad, State of the Union, verifiability policy, etc) without revealing my connection to past editing, I will still edit under this account for certain topics.

Contacting me under this account should be kept to a minimum. For the few users interested in knowing my new nom de plume, I can be emailed at danofalltrades7@hotmail.com.

Stupid, threatening, or otherwise lame comments will be reverted. This is not a violation of [[WP:OWN]]. In addition, certain users are ''banned'' from editing this page. To those I collaborated with under this account, thanks a bunch. To the rest of you's, fudge off. [[User:Tchadienne|Tchadienne]] 20:12, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
==Old comments==
''Civility''
''Civility''
Hi, I’m just dropping by to note that the debate in which you’re involved at the moment doesn’t seem to be going very well. Perhaps a more civil approach with a focus on the disputed object might be more productive. Have a nice day. —[[User:xyzzy_n|xyzzy]]<sub>[[User talk:xyzzy_n|n]]</sub> 21:15, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I’m just dropping by to note that the debate in which you’re involved at the moment doesn’t seem to be going very well. Perhaps a more civil approach with a focus on the disputed object might be more productive. Have a nice day. —[[User:xyzzy_n|xyzzy]]<sub>[[User talk:xyzzy_n|n]]</sub> 21:15, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:12, 8 August 2006

Due to harassment I will once again be switching accounts. However, in order to keep on editing widely-neglected topics (Chad, State of the Union, verifiability policy, etc) without revealing my connection to past editing, I will still edit under this account for certain topics.

Contacting me under this account should be kept to a minimum. For the few users interested in knowing my new nom de plume, I can be emailed at danofalltrades7@hotmail.com.

Stupid, threatening, or otherwise lame comments will be reverted. This is not a violation of WP:OWN. In addition, certain users are banned from editing this page. To those I collaborated with under this account, thanks a bunch. To the rest of you's, fudge off. Tchadienne 20:12, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Old comments

Civility Hi, I’m just dropping by to note that the debate in which you’re involved at the moment doesn’t seem to be going very well. Perhaps a more civil approach with a focus on the disputed object might be more productive. Have a nice day. —xyzzyn 21:15, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alliance for the Restoration of Peace and Counterterrorism Hey bro, i please yu something:D we made same article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alliance_for_the_Restoration_of_Peace_and_Counterterrorism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alliance_for_the_Restoration_of_Peace_and_Counter-Terrorism actually, we made different versions.... we'd have 2 unite them (make one article from 2 of them ), I dnt know how to do it:) bye,bye >User talk:Ipernar

Warned You've already been warned and blocked once for reverting warnings on your talk page. Do it again and you will be blocked again. Sasquatch t|c 02:30, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That was not a warning. But go ahead and block me... since im already illegitimately blocked, somehow blocking me again for reverting your comment on my talkpage would be quite amusing.

Welcome!

Hello, Tchadienne, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Tchadienne 02:43, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Olive branch Hi, I never meant to offend you in any way, and I certainly never meant to preach to you or patronise you. If I did so, I apologise. If you'd ever like to chat I'm usually on IRC, nickname jacoplane... I'm actually rather interested in your insight in African affairs, but I guess I'll never get to converse with you about because of this animosity we've got going between us for some reason. I'm sorry you felt you had to abandon your old account, I hope it wasn't because of me. I hope you don't think I'm stalking you, if you do, I'll leave you alone. I just wasn't satisfied with the way we left our dispute, which is why I contacted you again. If you don't want to correspond with me again I'll understand and I'll leave you alone. Take care, jacoplane 01:50, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jewess See my comment at Talk:Banu Nadir. — BRIAN0918 • 2006-06-16 17:16

  • Yes, but not offensive for the reasons you claim. See the article's talk page. — BRIAN0918 • 2006-06-16 17:28

Welcome back Hi Tchadienne. Just wanted to give you a welcome back. I'm happy that all that happened to you hasn't make you lose interest for wikipedia (BTW, great name!). Ciao, and have care :-)--Aldux 17:42, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sudan, Chad & CAR Hi Tchadienne, sorry I awnser only now, but I've been away from wiki for some days. Thanks for the link; I must admit I made a jump when I read the article, I had simply no idea such a thing could happen; as a rule the CAR has had little problems with both Sudan and Chad, even if they have long borders in common. That it's bad, there can be little doubt; but it's hard to understand why such a thing is happening; I don't see the point for muslim Chadian insurgents to attack CAR, and how they, or even Sudan, can believe to earn anything from such an action. Maybe the insurgents aren't anymore sure of Sudan's support, and are searching new logistic bases of support; even if I doubt they will find any in CAR, where muslims are few and not very militant. As for Sudan, I don't know if they're behind this; relations with CAR are quite good, so I don't see why they would provoke one of the few bordering countries that doesn't hate them.--Aldux 00:05, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As for the article at current events, in my opinion that the Sudanese invasion of Chad, civil war in Chad, and genocide in Darfur, are linked, is obvious to everybody who has eyes to see. That they were ever "initially four different conflicts" is questionable; the present Chadian civil war and the the Chad-Sudan conflict were clearly from the start connected to Darfur. Maybe you've been a bit hasty with CAR; we really know to little there to yet speak of a regional alliance, to understand if it was the real birth of a CAR rebel movement, or something that's going to rapidly disappear.--Aldux 00:20, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A Request for Your Feedback Hello; I noticed you have recently contributed to the current events portal and thought you would be interested in looking at a proposal for redesigning the page. If you can, please take a look at a redesign proposal I created and provide some feedback on its talk page. So far, very little feedback has been received, and so the additional input would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance. joturner 23:09, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Libya Please feel free to evaluate the Libya article which has become a 'Featured Article Candidate' and write you support or opposition on Wikipedia:Featured article candidates. Hopefully Libya will become only the second African country to be featured on Wikipedia. Thanks --User:Jaw101ie 12:28, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've helped correct your concerns on the Libya talkpage regarding lack of info on Qadafhi and Idi Amin, Jews in Libya. Could you please reconsider your opposition to Libya becoming a featured article. --Jaw101ie 21:49, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I have responded to both of your objections (Amin, the history of the Jews in Libya) in a note just under your comment on the Featured article debate. It would be interesting to hear your response, if only for the fact that further objections could help us build a better article. --(Mingus ah um 19:15, 18 July 2006 (UTC))[reply]

My Apologies My sincerest pardon. I was wondering whether it was allowed or not (to strike comments). I thought that the comments were like a 'to do list' so after I did it, I striked it. I honestly did not know it was not allowed.

My apologies again,

Regards,

--Jaw101ie 00:23, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Much of the Libya article has been improved and updated since I applied it for nomination. References, municipalites and a reasonable amount of copyediting has been done with more on the way. At the moment your vote seems to be neutral. Could you please reconsider?

Thank you very much,

--Jaw101ie 11:21, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chad-Sudan conflict Please answer me how can you state that you started the article? If you see the history your error will be revealed. You started working 4 hours after its creation... see--TheFEARgod 15:47, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

P.S: you can state that you WORKED ON IT but...--TheFEARgod 15:47, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I had to defend some rights by me and let you know it :) Forget it--TheFEARgod 16:03, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

btw, see: Talk:Ethiopian involvement in Somalia for changes--TheFEARgod 16:04, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

An accord? Probably N'Djamena Accord would be more careful, and wouldn't weight to many expectations on the the accord. The more I learn on the history of Chad, the more I become skeptical regards accords and ceasefires :-/. But unfortunately I'can't do it now; the Chadian Civil War and the Chadian-Libyan conflict are in preparation, and I also want to expand the biogs. of the presidents. --Aldux 17:44, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, I noted you reverted my revert. So you think that the Janjaweed are an autonomous force, mostly independent from the Sudanese government? Just to understand your view.--Aldux 17:53, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A great idea, I've also found that the French wikipedia already had created a similar page. This is exactly the type of article we needed.--Aldux 14:17, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blogs Blogs are not reliable sources because they are personal webpages that have no editorial oversight. Anyone can place anything on a blog. The only exception is if it is a blog by a well-known expert or journalist. Jayjg (talk) 18:31, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:3RR Hi, just to let you know, "last rv of the day (according to [[WP:3RR), restoring criticism" this edit summary suggests that you believe you are "entitled" to 3 reverts per day. This is not the case, please read WP:3RR. Regards - FrancisTyers · 00:27, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note, this isn't an attempt to bully you (I just read your userpage), but I'm sure that you're aware that you can be blocked even if you don't violate the 3RR for edit warring and these kind of edit summaries will not help your case :) - FrancisTyers · 00:30, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]