User talk:Nouniquenames: Difference between revisions
→ArbCom elections are now open!: new section |
ClueBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Nouniquenames/Archive 3. (BOT) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
= Messages, etc = |
= Messages, etc = |
||
== please don't == |
|||
Please don't retire. We need someone with integrity around here. And that's better than any barnstar anyone could ever award. [[User:Nothingknewunderthesun|Nothingknewunderthesun]] ([[User talk:Nothingknewunderthesun|talk]]) 04:56, 29 August 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== Question == |
== Question == |
||
Revision as of 17:48, 24 November 2015
 Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Messages, etc
Question
I'm trying to figure out the history of the James Rosemond page. The archives aren't like the other ones. The history is illegible and misleading. Perhaps you could help me understand the reason for this screen shot or the talk page archives as it stands on August 30th:
(cur | prev) 01:49, 29 May 2014 Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) m . . (26,342 bytes) (-30,169) . . (Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:James Rosemond/Archive 1) (bot) (undo)
(cur | prev) 01:47, 20 May 2014 Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) m . . (56,511 bytes) (-16,779) . . (Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:James Rosemond/Archive 1) (bot) (undo)
(cur | prev) 06:51, 16 May 2014 Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) m . . (73,290 bytes) (-39,861) . . (Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:James Rosemond/Archive 1) (bot) (undo)
(cur | prev) 01:39, 15 May 2014 Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) m . . (113,151 bytes) (-27,584) . . (Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:James Rosemond/Archive 1) (bot) (undo)
(cur | prev) 01:43, 30 April 2014 Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) m . . (140,735 bytes) (-2,662) . . (Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:James Rosemond/Archive 1) (bot) (undo)
(cur | prev) 01:36, 29 April 2014 Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) m . . (143,397 bytes) (-4,995) . . (Archiving 4 discussion(s) to Talk:James Rosemond/Archive 1) (bot) (undo)
(cur | prev) 01:38, 27 April 2014 Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) m . . (148,392 bytes) (-2,637) . . (Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:James Rosemond/Archive 1) (bot) (undo)
When you press on the archives they are out of order. I'd be most grateful. Or is there a place that would be best to ask about it.
Thanks
Nothingknewunderthesun (talk) 17:48, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)