User talk:TJH2018: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:58, 19 May 2016

You stop, shithead, and I will stop.

My name is Rob, but my username on here is cityscaper. I see that you have asked me not to edit Pasadena, Californias climate data. I have done so because not only becuse I am totally set on studying meterology at San Jose Statem, but also because the data has not been edited in several years and new monthly record highs have been broken. I also do not like that you threatened to report me. Judging but your username and the fact that is says your at school, you seem like your that class of 2018 or a sophomore in high school like I am. In the future, please be professional about people who edit things. You threatened to block me which you are in no position to do so. Thanks! :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cityscaper (talk • contribs) 23:55, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Cityscaper: First off, I haven't threatened you at all. You should know Wikipedia's policy on verifiability by this point. You can edit whatever you want, as long as you have a verifiable source. --TJH2018 talk 15:12, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion criteria

You tagged Альянс-Тех Харцага for speedy deletion because "not in English". Please note that this is explicitly exempted from the criteria for speedy deletion (see WP:CSD#G1). WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:17, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@WikiDan61: Thanks for the info. I've always wondered about that! Cheers! TJH2018 talk 18:42, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hydraulic fracturing

Hi there. I really, really think you should revisit your recent revert on that article. ;) Favonian (talk) 18:58, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Favonian: Whoops, my bad :) My Chromebook is too stupid to handle that much text, so would you mind reverting me? That would be a big help! TJH2018 talk 19:01, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done. My laptop was wading through treacle, but somehow made it. Favonian (talk) 19:04, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. TJH2018 talk 19:05, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

vandalizing

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Living in Bondage, you may be blocked from editing without further notice — Preceding unsigned comment added by Achalugo (talk • contribs) 19:34, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.

I am wondering about your recent deletes of my joint commission criticisms. I cited peer reviewed articles. It is unclear why you decide this was not a good enough source. Please explain further.

Lucas, Charles E., Angie L. Vlahos, and Anna M. Ledgerwood. "Kindness kills: the negative impact of pain as the fifth vital sign." Journal of the American College of Surgeons 205.1 (2007): 101-107.

Journal of American College of Surgeons not verifiable? You are kidding right? Try this link.

http://www.journalacs.org

Here is a link to the article I referenced. http://www.journalacs.org/article/S1072-7515(07)00152-4/abstract

How about this reference?

The efficacy and safety of pain management before and after implementation of hospital-wide pain management standards: is patient safety compromised by treatment based solely on numerical pain ratings?." Anesthesia & Analgesia 101.2 (2005): 474-480

I use this reputable journal every day in my practice, as do 100% of anesthesiologists practicing today. To claim it isn't a verifiable source is very strange.

Here is a direct link to the article I reference. http://journals.lww.com/anesthesia-analgesia/Abstract/2005/08000/The_Efficacy_and_Safety_of_Pain_Management_Before.32.aspx

Please respond with a very detailed explanation why you feel these sources are not verifiable.

Thanks.

I'm not sure how to do this talk - page stuff. I hope this message gets to you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.83.115.2 (talk) 20:05, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@159.83.115.2: Hi, I'm gonna send you over to WP:CITE. This should help you out when citing a source. Cheers! TJH2018 talk 22:05, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

Well said. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 21:34, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

American Nazi Party

You're kidding, right? Did you even bother to look at the talk page and ANI? The sources are very clear: the organization does not exist anymore, therefore it makes absolutely no sense to use the present tense instead of the past in the lead. Laval (talk) 21:45, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Laval: The AN/I was basically a back-and-forth banter between you and 7=3, and it was quite clear that no source was given. TJH2018 talk 22:24, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Archbishop Booth

@TJH2018: to be technical the reference I added is not specific to the COA - it does not mention it anywhere. However, I am faced with an utterly juvenile argument (which I have properly referenced) about the archbishop's COA. The reference does not have anything to do with it since it stands on its own & provides a reference to Archbishop Booth. I can see Wiki is not very welcoming to new (or at least correct) info. Please help. L'honorable (talk) 22:03, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi L'honorable, there has to be a specific reference to the COA, or else how do we know if it is really his COA? When it comes to verifiability, enwiki doesn't tend to let it slide, if you know what I mean. All I can really do for you is to point you to WP:CITE, WP:VERIFY, and WP:REF. Sorry if it's not much help. Cheers! TJH2018 talk 22:23, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi hi - I am a bit fed up with this since I was ambushed by two folk who'll I readily admit know much about history (& one of them especially about ecclesiastical history) & I bow to their superior knowledge on such subjects. However, when it comes to heraldry they seem to have taken the bit between the teeth and basically downright stated that I don't know what I am talking about (yet apart from continuing to make such an accusation they don't cite anything which contradicts what I have stated). It's a bit difficult to reason with people who either have clearly made up their minds to oppose whatever you say or don't themselves know the subject. Let me elucidate in full (somewhere - because on the archbishop's Talk page another statement was made which doesn't make sense in heraldic terms). Many thanks L'honorable (talk) 22:28, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@TJH2018: I tried explaining all this on the relevant Talk Page but got bumped out when I tried to save my lengthy explanation. Anyway forget this for the time being - it really isn't that important - but is frustrating when constantly ambushed by people left right & centre who won't even let one leave a full explanatory note. Nowhere do they state anything other than they object - whereas I have provided links references etc. This is somewhat silly to say the least - hopefully someone in Heraldry Project can advise better (since I seem to be persona non grata). The evidence can be found at: Burke's Extinct and Dormant Baronetcies & www.exploreyork.org.uk. Anyway ciao! Thanks so far. L'honorable (talk) 23:00, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@L'honorable: I feel your pain, let me see what I can do...TJH2018 talk 23:01, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks indeed L'honorable (talk) 23:02, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

please see flwg ref: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=LKIKAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA71&dq=burke%27s+extinct+and+dormant+baronetcies+booth&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi148eD2NXMAhWBAMAKHeBlBOQQ6AEIHDAA#v=onepage&q=burke's%20extinct%20and%20dormant%20baronetcies%20booth&f=false & btw I have just been reverted again by Hchc2009 so rightly or wrongly I am not welcome at this page anymore. Sad. L'honorable (talk) 23:30, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@L'honorable: Here's my suggestion: take it to WP:ANI. An administrator will be able to help you out there. TJH2018 talk 23:32, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

but I have never done that before & why start now - best just to leave it & return when others see sense surely? Thanks your support though. L'honorable (talk) 23:33, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Be WP:BOLD, and the worst thing that can happen to you is for the administrators to side with them. I think you have a good chance here...TJH2018 talk 23:34, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've just given them one last chance before following your suggestion (if need be). Thanks L'honorable (talk) 23:46, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Now one of them has accused me of edit-warring - this really is pathetic - is it timely to to launch the WP:ANI? I've never known anything like this. Or is it best to leave it & let them have their day? L'honorable (talk) 23:53, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Really, it's up to you at this point. I've done everything I can without getting involved myself. TJH2018 talk 23:53, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK thanks - not happy about this but they still persist so I've applied to Admin. Best L'honorable (talk) 00:12, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That didn't work out too well unless you see it differently? L'honorable (talk) 02:32, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No it didn't, and I'm perplexed as to why you were given the advice to take it to the dramah boards. I think TJH2018 set you up to fail, if I'm honest. Cassianto^Talk 03:31, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Glossary of video game terms

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Glossary of video game terms. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Username policy

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Username policy. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A cheeseburger for you!

You must be hungry after sweating it out on the Fortuna Salient back there

Many thanks for the back-up bro! Cheers _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 19:21, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: No problemo! All in a day's work during English class...TJH2018 talk 19:23, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Brilliant !!what else are they for eh

take care! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 19:55, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+You stop, shithead, and I will stop.
-{{User:MiszaBot/config
-| algo                = old(7d)
-| archive             = User talk:TJH2018/Archive %(counter)d
-| counter             = 2
-| maxarchivesize      = 25K
-| archiveheader       = {{Automatic archive navigator}}
-| minthreadstoarchive = 1
-| minthreadsleft      = 1
-}}
-{{Vandalism information|prefix=User:MWOAP/}}
-{{Talk header}}{{AutoArchivingNotice|bot=Lowercase sigmabot III|age=7|small=no}}{{User:TJH2018/Zero Tolerance}}
-{{UserStatus|fsize=85|purge=yes}}
-== Hello there! ==
 My name is Rob, but my username on here is cityscaper. I see that you have asked me not to edit Pasadena, Californias climate data. I have done so because not only becuse I am totally set on studying meterology at San Jose Statem, but also because the data has not been edited in several years and new monthly record highs have been broken. I also do not like that you threatened to report me. Judging but your username and the fact that is says your at school, you seem like your that class of 2018 or a sophomore in high school like I am. In the future, please be professional about people who edit things. You threatened to block me which you are in no position to do so. Thanks! :)  <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Cityscaper|Cityscaper]] ([[User talk:Cityscaper|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Cityscaper|contribs]]) 23:55, 11 May 2016 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->