Talk:Andrea James: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:59, 22 May 2016

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Andrea James article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3: 30 days

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers / Politics and Government Start‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Chicago Start‑class Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

LGBTQ+ studies Start‑class

	LGBTQ portal This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Jokestress (talk · contribs)

Archives

1, 2, 3

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by .

Is Andrea James controversial?

Irn removed the adjective "controversial," which I had added to this article. I recognize that BLPs need to be written conservatively, but I have been reading around on the topic, and it's hard to escape the word. Many (most?) of the RS's about her (other than the ones she herself wrote) associate her with one or another controversy and her involvement in them. Many of her views have been hotly contested by experts in various fields, and many (most?) of the BLPs of involved in the issue refer to them as controversial scientists, etc. It's a little hard to swallow that she is the only non-controversial person involved. (Even her activity on wikipedia has been the subject of controversy.) I realize she was (once) a big figure on WP, but if any BLP anywhere on WP is going to be said to be controversial, it's hard to think that this one would not be. Irn (and others): What standard do you think should be used?Starburst9 (talk) 18:59, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 |archive = Talk:Andrea James/Archive %(counter)d
 }}
+== Is Andrea James controversial? ==
+Irn removed the adjective "controversial," which I had added to this article.  I recognize that BLPs need to be written conservatively, but I have been reading around on the topic, and it's hard to escape the word.  Many (most?) of the RS's about her (other than the ones she herself wrote) associate her with one or another controversy and her involvement in them.  Many of her views have been hotly contested by experts in various fields, and many (most?) of the BLPs of involved in the issue refer to them as controversial scientists, etc.  It's a little hard to swallow that she is the only non-controversial person involved.  (Even her activity on wikipedia has been the subject of controversy.)  I realize she was (once) a big figure on WP, but if ''any'' BLP ''anywhere'' on WP is going to be said to be controversial, it's hard to think that this one would not be.  Irn (and others): What standard do you think should be used?[[User:Starburst9|Starburst9]] ([[User talk:Starburst9|talk]]) 18:59, 22 May 2016 (UTC)