User talk:Theyoyomaster: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:56, 7 July 2016

July 2016

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Shooting of Alton Sterling. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Please join the talk page discussion that I started and do not restore this material without obtaining consensus. - Mr X 14:43, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a novel synthesis or original research. The cited page clearly states the fact of Louisiana law. Open carry is an explicitly defined term and he was not open carrying. The fact that he was not open carrying means that listing the status of open carry in the context of the shooting without explaining what open carry means is deliberately misleading and detracts from the credibility of the article. I will alter it to make it more factual but my reliable sources clearly state the meaning of open carry and the applicable laws as well as the conditions of the shooting. It is a cited and verifiable fact that his gun was in his pocket and as such it was concealed meaning that referencing of the open carry law is blatantly misleading.

Since this deliberate obstruction of the facts of the case is rampant in current news reporting it is relevant to the Wikipedia article to detail the actual laws and their applicability to this case.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Shooting of Alton Sterling, you may be blocked from editing. - Mr X 14:56, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 14:50, 7 July 2016 edit Theyoyomaster (talk \| contribs) 60 edits →July 2016 ← Previous edit		Revision as of 14:56, 7 July 2016 edit undo MrX (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 97,648 edits Warning: Adding original research, including unpublished syntheses of sources on Shooting of Alton Sterling. (TW) Next edit →
Line 5:		Line 5:

	Since this deliberate obstruction of the facts of the case is rampant in current news reporting it is relevant to the Wikipedia article to detail the actual laws and their applicability to this case.		Since this deliberate obstruction of the facts of the case is rampant in current news reporting it is relevant to the Wikipedia article to detail the actual laws and their applicability to this case.

			[[File:Nuvola apps important.svg\|25px\|alt=Warning icon]] Please stop your [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing\|disruptive editing]]. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:No original research\|no original research policy]] by adding your personal analysis or [[Wikipedia:No original research#Synthesis of published material that advances a position\|synthesis]] into articles, as you did at [[:Shooting of Alton Sterling]], you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy\|blocked from editing]]. <!-- Template:uw-nor3 --> - [[user: MrX\|Mr]][[user talk:MrX\|X]] 14:56, 7 July 2016 (UTC)