User talk:Iennes

Iennes talk

January 2013

Please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Trilogy (The Weeknd album), disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems.

• MOS:ALBUM - "Note the standard method of attributing songwriters—write (and link) the full name the first time it appears, and then just give the last name"
• WP:MOS - "Revert-warring over optional styles is unacceptable.[1] If discussion cannot determine which style to use in an article, defer to the style used by the first major contributor."

Please try and edit in accordance with Wikipedia guidelines and policies. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 23:05, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ebony Bones, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Public Enemy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:09, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Air (band)

Regarding "Often" vs "Sometimes" in the opening sentence of the article Air (band) - there is an open RfC on the matter, at Talk:Air (band)#Rfc. Until that RfC is concluded (RfCs typically run for thirty days) and consensus reached, the sentence should not be altered. Since that RfC opened, there have been nine edits to the article - eight of which have concerned that single word. Only two people are involved, and both of you have been around for well over five years, so you should know that this behaviour is clearly edit warring, and also that sanctions are available to prevent this from continuing. Looking back through the page history, I see that on 17 February alone the two of you each made more than four reverts on basically the same matter, which (had it been noticed at the time) would have been sufficient grounds to have both of you blocked for violation of WP:3RR. Please don't let that happen again; thank you for your patience. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 15:37, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

For making this revert (see the sentence "Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside of the 24-hour slot may also be considered edit warring." at WP:EW), I am formally serving you with:

Your recent editing history at Air (band) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:06, 3 March 2017 (UTC)