Jump to content

IMDb: Difference between revisions

Edit links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Discussion board in IMDb was removed so I removed it in registration part.
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
No edit summary
Line 112: Line 112:
As of 20 February 2017, all the message boards and their content have been permanently removed. According to the website, the decision was made because the boards were "no longer providing a positive, useful experience for the vast majority of our more than 250 million monthly users worldwide".<ref>[http://www.imdb.com/board/announcement IMDb Message Boards Announcement]</ref> Col Needham also mentioned in a post some months earlier that the boards received less income from ads, and that their members only made up a very small part of the website's visitors plus the fact that the boards were costly to run due to the system's age and dated design, which did not make much sense business wise.<ref>[https://getsatisfaction.com/imdb/topics/can-someone-on-the-inside-explain-to-me Can someone on the inside explain to me]</ref>
As of 20 February 2017, all the message boards and their content have been permanently removed. According to the website, the decision was made because the boards were "no longer providing a positive, useful experience for the vast majority of our more than 250 million monthly users worldwide".<ref>[http://www.imdb.com/board/announcement IMDb Message Boards Announcement]</ref> Col Needham also mentioned in a post some months earlier that the boards received less income from ads, and that their members only made up a very small part of the website's visitors plus the fact that the boards were costly to run due to the system's age and dated design, which did not make much sense business wise.<ref>[https://getsatisfaction.com/imdb/topics/can-someone-on-the-inside-explain-to-me Can someone on the inside explain to me]</ref>


As IMDb did not offer to allow access to message board archives from the site, several websites appeared that contain all or a proportion of the previous message boards content from the site.<ref name="IMDbArchive.com 1">{{cite web|url=https://imdbarchive.com|title=IMDb Archive|publisher=IMDb Archive|date=|accessdate=March 7, 2017}}</ref><ref name="Moviechat.org 1">{{cite web|url=https://www.moviechat.org|title=Movie Chat|publisher=Movie Chat|date=|accessdate=2017-03-07}}</ref>
⚫
==Litigation==


==Comparisons==
The IMDb is owned by [[Amazon.com]], and being a commercial organisation, they charge large annual fees for customers to use their core data API.<ref name="IMDB fees1">{{cite web|url=http://feedback.letterboxd.com/forums/136771-general/suggestions/3673038|title=Use the IMDb rather than or in addition to themoviedb.org for accepted movies|publisher=[[Letterboxd]]|date=February 20, 2013|accessdate=2017-02-27}}</ref> Several similar non-commercial databases have therefore been created, so individual users and other companies can [[open source|openly]] collect and consolidate their own separate data without having to pay for IMDb's service. Two prominent ones that are used by individuals for their media management software's metadata –such as [[Plex (software)|Plex]], [[Kodi (software)|Kodi]], and others– are [[TheTVDB]] for TV data, and [[The Movie Database]] (TMDb) for both movie and TV data.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://support.plex.tv/hc/en-us/articles/200241558-Agents|title=Agents - Plex|publisher=[[Plex (software)|Plex]]|date=|accessdate=2017-02-27}}</ref> Also, TMDb's open sourced nature, means many movie and TV sites can access and use it's data for their own projects, such as [[Letterboxd]].<ref name="IMDB fees1"/> Other sites also exist, including Open Media Database (OMDb), an openly-editable alternative, with a [[Creative Commons license]], which has operated publicly since 2007.<ref name="OMDb.org 1">{{cite web|url=http://www.omdb.org/content/About:Stats|title=Open Media Database|publisher=Open Media Database|date=|accessdate=2017-03-08}}</ref>

In late February 2017, following the IMDb giving around two weeks notice of the complete removal of the message boards functionality from their site, including all the historical postings data, as TMDb contains message boards for each individual item, it started to gain interest for this functionality from previous IMDb users.<ref name="guardian info1">{{cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/film/2017/feb/17/why-imdb-should-rethink-the-decision-to-close-its-message-boards|title=Why IMDb should rethink the decision to close its message boards|publisher=[[The Guardian]]|author=Lara Williams|date=February 17, 2017|accessdate=2017-02-25}}</ref><ref name="imdb mb1">{{cite web|url=http://www.imdb.com/boards|title=IMDb Message Boards - IMDb|publisher=IMDb|author=Col Needham|date=February 20, 2017|accessdate=2017-02-27}}</ref><ref name="bbc mb1">{{cite web|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-38879674|title=Film site IMDB to shut down message boards|publisher=[[BBC]]|work=[[BBC online]]|date=February 6, 2017|accessdate=2017-02-26}}</ref> Following the message boards removal, many previous message board users found TMDb instead, as the site immediately expanded upon the previously basic incorporated message board functionality for each object on the site (movie, TV series/episode, company, person) to help users continue conversing about movie and TV related subjects.<ref name="TMDb MB increase1">{{cite web|url=https://blog.themoviedb.org/a-great-disturbance-in-the-force-f6d38557439d|title=A great disturbance in the Force|publisher=[[The Movie Database]]|author=Travis Bell|date=February 16, 2017|accessdate=2017-02-27}}</ref><ref name="RI alts1">{{cite web|url=https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/5v1hsb/the_imdb_message_boards_are_officially_dead_are|title=The IMDB message boards are officially dead. Are there any worthy replacements|date=February 20, 2017|accessdate=2017-02-27}}</ref>

⚫
==Litigation==
In 2011, in the case of ''[[Hoang v. Amazon.com]]'', IMDb was sued by an anonymous actress for more than {{Currency|1&nbsp;million}} due to IMDb's revealing her age (40, at the time).<ref>{{cite web|last=Bahr|first=Lindsey|url=http://insidemovies.ew.com/2011/10/18/imdb-lawsuit/|title=Lawsuit against IMDb revealing private information|publisher=Insidemovies.ew.com|date=October 18, 2011|accessdate=April 25, 2013}}</ref> The actress claimed that revealing her age could cause her to lose acting opportunities.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-15492579|title=Acting unions criticise IMDb in age row|publisher=BBC|date=October 29, 2011|accessdate=October 29, 2011}}</ref> Judge [[Marsha J. Pechman]], a U.S. district judge in Seattle, dismissed the lawsuit, saying the actress had no grounds to proceed with an anonymous complaint. The actress re-filed and so revealed that the complainant is Huong Hoang of Texas, who uses the stage name Junie Hoang.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.sky.com/home/world-news/article/16144281|title=Actress Sued Amazon For Revealing Age 40 Identified As Huong Junie Hoang|publisher=News.sky.com|date=January 7, 2012|accessdate=April 21, 2012}}</ref> In 2013, Pechman dismissed all causes of action except for a [[breach of contract]] claim against IMDb; a jury then sided with IMDb on that claim.<ref>{{cite web|title=Actress age claim against IMDb rejected|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-22120587|work=BBC News|accessdate=April 12, 2013}}</ref> {{As of|February 2015}}, an appeal was filed.<ref name=9thcir-calendar>{{cite web |title=Calendar for Seattle, Washington |url=http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/calendar/view.php?caseno=13-35390 |publisher=United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit |accessdate=November 24, 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Gardner |first1=Eriq |title=Appeals Court Hears the Scary Things That Can Happen to Actors Who Lie to IMDb |url=http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/appeals-court-hears-scary-things-770835 |accessdate=February 10, 2015 |agency=Hollywood Reporter |date=February 6, 2015}}</ref> All claims against IMDB were dismissed by the court in March 2015.<ref>Gardner, Eriq. [http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/imdb-preserves-legal-win-revelation-784985 IMDb Preserves Legal Win Over Revelation of Actress' Age], ''[[The Hollywood Reporter]]'', March 27, 2015.</ref>
In 2011, in the case of ''[[Hoang v. Amazon.com]]'', IMDb was sued by an anonymous actress for more than {{Currency|1&nbsp;million}} due to IMDb's revealing her age (40, at the time).<ref>{{cite web|last=Bahr|first=Lindsey|url=http://insidemovies.ew.com/2011/10/18/imdb-lawsuit/|title=Lawsuit against IMDb revealing private information|publisher=Insidemovies.ew.com|date=October 18, 2011|accessdate=April 25, 2013}}</ref> The actress claimed that revealing her age could cause her to lose acting opportunities.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-15492579|title=Acting unions criticise IMDb in age row|publisher=BBC|date=October 29, 2011|accessdate=October 29, 2011}}</ref> Judge [[Marsha J. Pechman]], a U.S. district judge in Seattle, dismissed the lawsuit, saying the actress had no grounds to proceed with an anonymous complaint. The actress re-filed and so revealed that the complainant is Huong Hoang of Texas, who uses the stage name Junie Hoang.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.sky.com/home/world-news/article/16144281|title=Actress Sued Amazon For Revealing Age 40 Identified As Huong Junie Hoang|publisher=News.sky.com|date=January 7, 2012|accessdate=April 21, 2012}}</ref> In 2013, Pechman dismissed all causes of action except for a [[breach of contract]] claim against IMDb; a jury then sided with IMDb on that claim.<ref>{{cite web|title=Actress age claim against IMDb rejected|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-22120587|work=BBC News|accessdate=April 12, 2013}}</ref> {{As of|February 2015}}, an appeal was filed.<ref name=9thcir-calendar>{{cite web |title=Calendar for Seattle, Washington |url=http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/calendar/view.php?caseno=13-35390 |publisher=United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit |accessdate=November 24, 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Gardner |first1=Eriq |title=Appeals Court Hears the Scary Things That Can Happen to Actors Who Lie to IMDb |url=http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/appeals-court-hears-scary-things-770835 |accessdate=February 10, 2015 |agency=Hollywood Reporter |date=February 6, 2015}}</ref> All claims against IMDB were dismissed by the court in March 2015.<ref>Gardner, Eriq. [http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/imdb-preserves-legal-win-revelation-784985 IMDb Preserves Legal Win Over Revelation of Actress' Age], ''[[The Hollywood Reporter]]'', March 27, 2015.</ref>


Also in 2011, in the case of United Video Properties Inc., et al. v. Amazon.Com Inc. et al.,<ref>{{cite web|title=Case Docket: United Video Properties Inc., et al v. Amazon.Com Inc. et al|url=http://ia700408.us.archive.org/8/items/gov.uscourts.ded.45528/gov.uscourts.ded.45528.docket.html|publisher=[[RECAP]]|accessdate=November 5, 2013}}</ref> IMDb and Amazon were sued by [[Rovi Corporation]] and others for patent infringement over their various program listing offerings.<ref>{{cite news|last=Masnick|first=Mike|title=Rovi Sues Amazon for Not Licensing its Electronic TV Guide Patent|url=http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110105/03393312527/rovi-sues-amazon-not-licensing-its-electronic-tv-guide-patent.shtml|accessdate=November 5, 2013|newspaper=[[Techdirt]]|date=January 12, 2011}}</ref> The patent claims were ultimately construed in a way favorable to IMDb and Rovi/United Video Properties lost the case, though as of November 2014 it is on appeal.<ref>{{cite web|last=Mullin|first=Joe|title=Netflix roasts Rovi's 'Interactive TV guide' patents at ITC|url=http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/11/netflix-roasts-rovis-interactive-tv-guide-patents-at-itc/|accessdate=November 5, 2013|work=[[Ars Technica]]|date=November 4, 2013}}</ref>
Also in 2011, in the case of United Video Properties Inc., et al. v. Amazon.Com Inc. et al.,<ref>{{cite web|title=Case Docket: United Video Properties Inc., et al v. Amazon.Com Inc. et al|url=http://ia700408.us.archive.org/8/items/gov.uscourts.ded.45528/gov.uscourts.ded.45528.docket.html|publisher=[[RECAP]]|accessdate=November 5, 2013}}</ref> IMDb and Amazon were sued by [[Rovi Corporation]] and others for patent infringement over their various program listing offerings.<ref>{{cite news|last=Masnick|first=Mike|title=Rovi Sues Amazon for Not Licensing its Electronic TV Guide Patent|url=http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110105/03393312527/rovi-sues-amazon-not-licensing-its-electronic-tv-guide-patent.shtml|accessdate=November 5, 2013|newspaper=[[Techdirt]]|date=January 12, 2011}}</ref> The patent claims were ultimately construed in a way favorable to IMDb and Rovi/United Video Properties lost the case, though as of November 2014 it is on appeal.<ref>{{cite web|last=Mullin|first=Joe|title=Netflix roasts Rovi's 'Interactive TV guide' patents at ITC|url=http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/11/netflix-roasts-rovis-interactive-tv-guide-patents-at-itc/|accessdate=November 5, 2013|work=[[Ars Technica]]|date=November 4, 2013}}</ref>


On January 1, 2017, the State of California implemented state bill AB-1687, a [[SAG-AFTRA]]-backed anti-ageism statute which requires "commercial online entertainment employment services" to honor requests by their subscribers for their ages and birthdays to be hidden.<ref name="thr-imdblaw">{{cite web|title=California Enacts Law Requiring IMDb to Remove Actor Ages on Request|url=http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/california-enacts-law-requiring-imdb-932330|website=The Hollywood Reporter|accessdate=15 November 2016}}</ref> On February 23, 2017, Judge Vince Girdhari Chhabria issued a stay on the bill pending a further trial, claiming that it possibly violated the [[First Amendment]] because it inhibited the public consumption of factual information. He also questioned the intent of the bill, as it was ostensibly meant to target IMDB.<ref name="thr-lawstruck">{{cite web|title=Judge Pauses Enforcement of IMDb Age Censorship Law|url=http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-pauses-enforcement-imdb-age-censorship-law-978797|website=The Hollywood Reporter|accessdate=23 February 2017}}</ref>
On January 1, 2017 the State of California implemented state bill AB-1687, a [[SAG-AFTRA]]-backed anti-ageism statute which requires "commercial online entertainment employment services" to honor requests by their subscribers for their ages and birthdays to be hidden.<ref name="thr-imdblaw">{{cite web|title=California Enacts Law Requiring IMDb to Remove Actor Ages on Request|url=http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/california-enacts-law-requiring-imdb-932330|website=The Hollywood Reporter|accessdate=15 November 2016}}</ref> On February 23, 2017, Judge Vince Girdhari Chhabria issued a stay on the bill pending a further trial, claiming that it possibly violated the [[First Amendment]] because it inhibited the public consumption of factual information. He also questioned the intent of the bill, as it was ostensibly meant to target IMDB.<ref name="thr-lawstruck">{{cite web|title=Judge Pauses Enforcement of IMDb Age Censorship Law|url=http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-pauses-enforcement-imdb-age-censorship-law-978797|website=The Hollywood Reporter|accessdate=23 February 2017}}</ref>


==See also==
==See also==

Revision as of 00:43, 8 March 2017

For the database system, see In-memory database. For the Malaysian fund, see 1MDB.
For information regarding IMDb as a citable source, see Wikipedia:Citing IMDb

IMDb
Type of site
Online database for movies, television, and video games
Available inEnglish
OwnerIMDb.com, Inc.
Created byCol Needham (CEO)
URLwww.imdb.com
CommercialYes
RegistrationRegistration is optional for members to participate in comments, ratings, and voting

The Internet Movie Database (abbreviated IMDb) is an online database of information related to films, television programs and video games, including cast, production crew, fictional characters, biographies, plot summaries, trivia and reviews, operated by IMDb.com, Inc., a subsidiary of Amazon.com.

Actors and crew can post their own résumé and upload photos of themselves for a yearly fee. U.S. users can view over 6,000 movies and television shows from CBS, Sony, and various independent filmmakers.

Launched in 1990 by computer programmer Col Needham, the company was incorporated in the UK as Internet Movie Database Ltd in 1996 with revenue generated through advertising, licensing and partnerships. In 1998 it became a subsidiary of Amazon.com, who were then able to use it as an advertising resource for selling DVDs and videotapes.

As of January 2017, IMDb has approximately 4.1 million titles (including episodes) and 7.7 million personalities in its database,[2] as well as 70 million registered users.

The site enables registered users to submit new material and edits to existing entries. Although all data is checked before going live, the system has been open to abuse and occasional errors are acknowledged. Users are also invited to rate any film on a scale of 1 to 10, and the totals are converted into a weighted mean-rating that is displayed beside each title, with online filters employed to deter ballot-stuffing. The site also featured message boards which stimulate regular debates among authenticated users. IMDb had shutdown the message boards permanently on February 20, 2017.

History

History before website

IMDb originated with a Usenet posting by British film fan and computer programmer Col Needham entitled "Those Eyes", about actresses with beautiful eyes. Others with similar interests soon responded with additions or different lists of their own. Needham subsequently started a (male) "Actors List", while Dave Knight began a "Directors List", and Andy Krieg took over "THE LIST" from Hank Driskill, which would later be renamed the "Actress List". Both lists had been restricted to people who were alive and working, but soon retired people were added, so Needham started what was then (but did not remain) a separate "Dead Actors/Actresses List". The goal of the participants now was to make the lists as inclusive as possible.

By late 1990, the lists included almost 10,000 movies and television series correlated with actors and actresses appearing therein. On October 17, 1990, Needham developed and posted a collection of Unix shell scripts which could be used to search the four lists, and thus the database that would become the IMDb was born.[3] At the time, it was known as the "rec.arts.movies movie database".

On the web

The database had been expanded to include additional categories of filmmakers and other demographic material, as well as trivia, biographies, and plot summaries. The movie ratings had been properly integrated with the list data and a centralized email interface for querying the database had been created by Alan Jay. Later in 1993 it moved onto the World Wide Web (a network in its infancy at that time) under the name of Cardiff Internet Movie Database.[4] The database resided on the servers of the computer science department of Cardiff University in Wales. Rob Hartill was the original web interface author. In 1994 the email interface was revised to accept the submission of all information meaning that people no longer had to email the specific list maintainer with their updates. However, the structure remained that information received on a single film was divided among multiple section managers, the sections being defined and determined by categories of film personnel and the individual filmographies contained therein. Over the next few years, the database was run on a network of mirrors across the world with donated bandwidth.[citation needed]

As an independent company

In 1996 IMDb was incorporated in the United Kingdom, becoming the Internet Movie Database Ltd. Founder Col Needham became the primary owner as well as the figurehead. General revenue for site operations was generated through advertising, licensing and partnerships.[citation needed]

As Amazon.com subsidiary (1998–present)

In 1998, Jeff Bezos, founder, owner and CEO of Amazon.com, struck a deal with Needham and other principal shareholders to buy IMDb outright for approximately $55 million[5] and attach it to Amazon as a subsidiary, private company.[6] This gave IMDb the ability to pay the shareholders salaries for their work, while Amazon.com would be able to use IMDb as an advertising resource for selling DVDs and videotapes.

IMDb continued to expand its functionality. On January 15, 2002, it added a subscription service known as IMDbPro, aimed at entertainment professionals. IMDbPro was announced and launched at the 2002 Sundance Film Festival. It provides a variety of services including film production and box office details, as well as a company directory and the ability of subscribers to add personal information pages with details at variance with pages about them appearing in the database.

As an additional incentive for users, as of 2003, users identified as one of "the top 100 contributors" of hard data received complimentary free access to IMDbPro for the following calendar year; for 2006 this was increased to the top 150 contributors, and for 2010 to the top 250.[7] In 2008 IMDb launched their first official foreign language version with the German IMDb.de. Also in 2008, IMDb acquired two other companies, Withoutabox and Box Office Mojo.

The website is Perl-based.[8] As of May 2011, the site has been filtered in China for more than one year, although many users address it through proxy server or by VPN.[9]

On October 17, 2010, IMDb launched original video (www.imdb.com/20) in celebration of its 20th anniversary.[10]

Television episodes

On January 26, 2006, "Full Episode Support" came online, allowing the database to support separate cast and crew listings for each episode of every television series. This was described by Col Needham as "the largest change we've ever made to our data model",[citation needed] and increased the number of titles in the database from 485,000 to nearly 755,000.[citation needed]

Characters' filmography

On October 2, 2007,[citation needed] the characters' filmography was added. Character entries are created from character listings in the main filmography database, and as such do not need any additional verification by IMDb staff. They have already been verified when they are added to the main filmography.

Instant viewing

On September 15, 2008, a feature was added that enables instant viewing of over 6,000 movies and television shows from CBS, Sony and a number of independent film makers, with direct links from their profiles.[11] Due to licensing restrictions, this feature is available only to viewers in the United States.[12]

Content and format

Data provided by subjects

In 2006, IMDb introduced its "Résumé Subscription Service", where actors and crew can post their own résumé and upload photos of themselves[13] for a yearly fee.[14] The base annual charge for including a photo with an account was $39.95 until 2010, when it was increased to $54.95. IMDb résumé pages are kept on a sub-page of the regular entry about that person, with a regular entry automatically created for each résumé subscriber who does not already have one.[15]

As of 2012, Resume Services is now included as part of an IMDbPro subscription, and is no longer offered as a separate subscription service.

Copyright, vandalism and error issues

All volunteers who contribute content to the database technically retain copyright on their contributions but the compilation of the content becomes the exclusive property of IMDb with the full right to copy, modify, and sublicense it and they are verified before posting.[16] Credit is not given on specific title or filmography pages to the contributor(s) who have provided information. Conversely, a credited text entry, such as a plot summary, may be corrected for content, grammar, sentence structure, perceived omission or error, by other contributors without having to add their names as co-authors. Due to the time required for processing submitted data or text before it is displayed, IMDb is different from user-contributed projects like Wikipedia, Discogs or OpenStreetMap in that contributors cannot add, delete, or modify the data or text on impulse, and the manipulation of data is controlled by IMDb technology and salaried staff.[17] IMDb has been subject to deliberate additions of false information; in 2012 a spokesperson said: "We make it easy for users and professionals to update much of our content, which is why we have an 'edit page.' The data that is submitted goes through a series of consistency checks before it goes live. Given the sheer volume of the information, occasional mistakes are inevitable, and, when reported, they are promptly fixed. We always welcome corrections."[18]

The Java Movie Database (JMDB)[19] is reportedly creating an IMDb_Error.log file that lists all the errors found while processing the IMDb plain text files. A Wiki alternative to IMDb is Open Media Database[20] whose content is also contributed by users but licensed under CC-by and the GFDL. Since 2007, IMDb has been experimenting with wiki-programmed sections for complete film synopses, parental guides, and FAQs about titles as determined by (and answered by) individual contributors.

Data format and access

IMDb does not provide an API for automated queries. However, most of the data can be downloaded as compressed plain text files and the information can be extracted using the command-line interface tools provided.[21] Beside that there is the Java-based graphical user interface (GUI) application available which is able to process the compressed plain text files and allow to search and display the information.[19] This GUI application supports different languages but the movie related data is in English, as made available by IMDb. A Python package called IMDbPY can also be used to process the compressed plain text files into a number of different SQL databases, enabling easier access to the entire dataset for searching or data mining.[22]

Film titles

The IMDb has sites in English as well as versions translated completely or in part into other languages (Danish, Finnish, French, German, Hungarian, Italian, Polish, Portuguese, Spanish and Romanian). The non-English language sites display film titles in the specified language. While originally the IMDb's English language sites displayed titles according to their original country-of-origin language, in 2010 the IMDb began allowing individual users in the UK and USA to choose primary title display by either the original-language titles, or the US or UK release title (normally, in English).

Ancillary features

User ratings of films

As one adjunct to data, the IMDb offers a rating scale that allows users to rate films on a scale of one to ten. It has been alleged that the rating system is flawed, for several reasons.[23]

IMDb indicates that submitted ratings are filtered and weighted in various ways in order to produce a weighted mean that is displayed for each film, series, and so on. It states that filters are used to avoid ballot stuffing; the method is not described in detail to avoid attempts to circumvent it. In fact, it sometimes produces an extreme difference between the weighted average and the arithmetic mean.

Film rankings (IMDb Top 250)

The IMDb Top 250 list is a listing of the top rated 250 films of all-time, based on ratings by the registered users of the website using the methods described. As of 2 February 2017, The Shawshank Redemption is #1 on the list.[24] The 'top 250' rating is based on only the ratings of "regular voters". The exact number of votes a registered user would have to make to be considered as a user who votes regularly has been kept secret. IMDb has stated that to maintain the effectiveness of the top 250 list they "deliberately do not disclose the criteria used for a person to be counted as a regular voter".[25] In addition to other weightings, the top 250 films are also based on a weighted rating formula referred to in actuarial science as a credibility formula.[26] This label arises because a statistic is taken to be more credible the greater the number of individual pieces of information; in this case from eligible users who submit ratings. Though the current formula is not disclosed, IMDb originally used the following formula to calculate their weighted rating:[27][28]

where:

= weighted rating
= average for the movie as a number from 1 to 10 (mean) = (Rating)
= number of votes for the movie = (votes)
= minimum votes required to be listed in the Top 250 (currently 25,000)
= the mean vote across the whole report (currently 7.0)

The in this formula is equivalent to a Bayesian posterior mean (See Bayesian statistics).

The IMDb also has a Bottom 100 feature which is assembled through a similar process although only 1500 votes must be received to qualify for the list.[29]

The top 250 list comprises a wide range of feature films, including major releases, cult films, independent films, critically acclaimed films, silent films and non-English language films. Short films and TV episodes are not included.

Since 2015, there has been a Top 250 list devoted to ranking television shows.[30]

Fan activity

One of the most-used features of the Internet Movie Database were the message boards that coincided with every title (excepting, as of 2013, TV episodes[31]) and name entry, along with over 140 main boards. This section was, at its inception, one of the more recent features of IMDb, having its beginnings in 2001. In order to post on the message boards a user needed to "authenticate" their account via cell phone, credit card, or by having been a recent customer of the parent company Amazon.com. Message boards expanded in recent years. The Soapbox started in 1999 as a general message board meant for debates on any subjects. The Politics board started in 2007 was a message board to discuss politics, news events and current affairs as well as history and economics. Both these message boards became the most popular message boards in IMDb, more popular on a long term basis than any individual movie message board. On 3 February 2017, IMDb announced that it would close down its message boards, effective on the 20 February 2017.[32]

As of 20 February 2017, all the message boards and their content have been permanently removed. According to the website, the decision was made because the boards were "no longer providing a positive, useful experience for the vast majority of our more than 250 million monthly users worldwide".[33] Col Needham also mentioned in a post some months earlier that the boards received less income from ads, and that their members only made up a very small part of the website's visitors plus the fact that the boards were costly to run due to the system's age and dated design, which did not make much sense business wise.[34]

As IMDb did not offer to allow access to message board archives from the site, several websites appeared that contain all or a proportion of the previous message boards content from the site.[35][36]

Comparisons

The IMDb is owned by Amazon.com, and being a commercial organisation, they charge large annual fees for customers to use their core data API.[37] Several similar non-commercial databases have therefore been created, so individual users and other companies can openly collect and consolidate their own separate data without having to pay for IMDb's service. Two prominent ones that are used by individuals for their media management software's metadata –such as Plex, Kodi, and others– are TheTVDB for TV data, and The Movie Database (TMDb) for both movie and TV data.[38] Also, TMDb's open sourced nature, means many movie and TV sites can access and use it's data for their own projects, such as Letterboxd.[37] Other sites also exist, including Open Media Database (OMDb), an openly-editable alternative, with a Creative Commons license, which has operated publicly since 2007.[39]

In late February 2017, following the IMDb giving around two weeks notice of the complete removal of the message boards functionality from their site, including all the historical postings data, as TMDb contains message boards for each individual item, it started to gain interest for this functionality from previous IMDb users.[40][41][42] Following the message boards removal, many previous message board users found TMDb instead, as the site immediately expanded upon the previously basic incorporated message board functionality for each object on the site (movie, TV series/episode, company, person) to help users continue conversing about movie and TV related subjects.[43][44]

Litigation

In 2011, in the case of Hoang v. Amazon.com, IMDb was sued by an anonymous actress for more than US$1,000,000 due to IMDb's revealing her age (40, at the time).[45] The actress claimed that revealing her age could cause her to lose acting opportunities.[46] Judge Marsha J. Pechman, a U.S. district judge in Seattle, dismissed the lawsuit, saying the actress had no grounds to proceed with an anonymous complaint. The actress re-filed and so revealed that the complainant is Huong Hoang of Texas, who uses the stage name Junie Hoang.[47] In 2013, Pechman dismissed all causes of action except for a breach of contract claim against IMDb; a jury then sided with IMDb on that claim.[48] As of February 2015, an appeal was filed.[49][50] All claims against IMDB were dismissed by the court in March 2015.[51]

Also in 2011, in the case of United Video Properties Inc., et al. v. Amazon.Com Inc. et al.,[52] IMDb and Amazon were sued by Rovi Corporation and others for patent infringement over their various program listing offerings.[53] The patent claims were ultimately construed in a way favorable to IMDb and Rovi/United Video Properties lost the case, though as of November 2014 it is on appeal.[54]

On January 1, 2017 the State of California implemented state bill AB-1687, a SAG-AFTRA-backed anti-ageism statute which requires "commercial online entertainment employment services" to honor requests by their subscribers for their ages and birthdays to be hidden.[55] On February 23, 2017, Judge Vince Girdhari Chhabria issued a stay on the bill pending a further trial, claiming that it possibly violated the First Amendment because it inhibited the public consumption of factual information. He also questioned the intent of the bill, as it was ostensibly meant to target IMDB.[56]

See also

References

  1. ^ "Imdb.com Site Info". Alexa Internet.
  2. ^ "Stats". IMDb.
  3. ^ Chmielewski, Dawn C. (January 19, 2013), "Col Needham created IMDb", Los Angeles Times
  4. ^ "Historical Internet Movie Database Site". Cardiff School of Computer Science & Informatics. Retrieved March 21, 2013.
  5. ^ http://www.secinfo.com/dr643.7kp.c.htm#2ndPage
  6. ^ "Internet Bookseller Amazon.com Announces Acquisition of United Kingdom Company The Internet Movie Database Ltd". IMDb via PR Newswire Europe. Retrieved January 15, 2007.
  7. ^ Needham, Col (January 1, 2011). "IMDb announcement: Top 250 Contributors for 2010". IMDb Contributors Top Contributors. Retrieved August 25, 2011.
  8. ^ What software/hardware are you using to run the site? imdb.com
  9. ^ Chacksfield, Marc (January 14, 2010). "China blocks number-one movie site IMDb". 2012 Future US, Inc.
  10. ^ Ehlrich, Brenna (September 30, 2010). "IMDb Turns 20, Launches Original Video to Celebrate". mashable.com.
  11. ^ Hoffman, Harrison (September 15, 2008). "IMDb now serves full-length videos". cnet. Retrieved September 17, 2008.
  12. ^ Modine, Austin (September 16, 2008). "IMDb adds full-length streaming movies (Show your US ID card at the door)". The Register. Retrieved September 17, 2008.
  13. ^ Lycos Europe and IMDb sign sales agreement for 9 European markets. Lycos Europe press release, July 10, 2006.
  14. ^ IMDb Resume FAQ: Can I subscribe only for one month or one year?. Retrieved January 22, 2008.
  15. ^ IMDb Resume FAQ: Is there any difference between a regular IMDb name page and an IMDb name page created via IMDb Resume?. Retrieved January 22, 2008.
  16. ^ IMDb Copyright and Conditions of Use. imdb.com
  17. ^ The Plain Text Data Files IMDb – Alternate Interfaces
  18. ^ "Which A-List Star Is Hacking IMDb Pages?". Hollywoodreporter.com. November 14, 2012. Retrieved February 25, 2013.
  19. ^ a b "Java Movie Database (JMDB)". Jmdb.de. Retrieved October 27, 2010.
  20. ^ omdb.org, website. Retrieved 2015-12-03.
  21. ^ "Alternate Interfaces". IMDb. Retrieved January 15, 2007.
  22. ^ "IMDbPY". IMDbPY. Retrieved February 14, 2011.
  23. ^ "Why IMDb's Top 250 Matters...And Why It Doesn't". Screenrant.com. April 13, 2010. Retrieved February 25, 2013.
  24. ^ "Top 250 movies as voted by our users". IMDb. Retrieved June 10, 2015.
  25. ^ "The user votes average on film or show X is 9.4, so it should appear in your top 250 Movies or TV list, yet it doesn't. Why?". IMDb.
  26. ^ Norberg, Ragnar (2006). "Credibility Theory". Encyclopedia of Actuarial Science (PDF). doi:10.1002/9780470012505.tac068. ISBN 0470846763. mirror
  27. ^ "IMDB's statement on their voting calculation". imdb.com. Retrieved February 5, 2015.
  28. ^ "IMDB Vote FAQ". IMDB.COM. Retrieved February 6, 2015.
  29. ^ "Bottom 100". IMDb. Retrieved March 1, 2007.
  30. ^ "Top 250 TV". IMDb. Retrieved March 16, 2016.
  31. ^ Each TV episode uses the same message board for the whole series
  32. ^ "Message Boards - IMDb". Retrieved February 3, 2017.
  33. ^ IMDb Message Boards Announcement
  34. ^ Can someone on the inside explain to me
  35. ^ "IMDb Archive". IMDb Archive. Retrieved March 7, 2017.
  36. ^ "Movie Chat". Movie Chat. Retrieved March 7, 2017.
  37. ^ a b "Use the IMDb rather than or in addition to themoviedb.org for accepted movies". Letterboxd. February 20, 2013. Retrieved February 27, 2017.
  38. ^ "Agents - Plex". Plex. Retrieved February 27, 2017.
  39. ^ "Open Media Database". Open Media Database. Retrieved March 8, 2017.
  40. ^ Lara Williams (February 17, 2017). "Why IMDb should rethink the decision to close its message boards". The Guardian. Retrieved February 25, 2017.
  41. ^ Col Needham (February 20, 2017). "IMDb Message Boards - IMDb". IMDb. Retrieved February 27, 2017.
  42. ^ "Film site IMDB to shut down message boards". BBC online. BBC. February 6, 2017. Retrieved February 26, 2017.
  43. ^ Travis Bell (February 16, 2017). "A great disturbance in the Force". The Movie Database. Retrieved February 27, 2017.
  44. ^ "The IMDB message boards are officially dead. Are there any worthy replacements". February 20, 2017. Retrieved February 27, 2017.
  45. ^ Bahr, Lindsey (October 18, 2011). "Lawsuit against IMDb revealing private information". Insidemovies.ew.com. Retrieved April 25, 2013.
  46. ^ "Acting unions criticise IMDb in age row". BBC. October 29, 2011. Retrieved October 29, 2011.
  47. ^ "Actress Sued Amazon For Revealing Age 40 Identified As Huong Junie Hoang". News.sky.com. January 7, 2012. Retrieved April 21, 2012.
  48. ^ "Actress age claim against IMDb rejected". BBC News. Retrieved April 12, 2013.
  49. ^ "Calendar for Seattle, Washington". United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Retrieved November 24, 2014.
  50. ^ Gardner, Eriq (February 6, 2015). "Appeals Court Hears the Scary Things That Can Happen to Actors Who Lie to IMDb". Hollywood Reporter. Retrieved February 10, 2015.
  51. ^ Gardner, Eriq. IMDb Preserves Legal Win Over Revelation of Actress' Age, The Hollywood Reporter, March 27, 2015.
  52. ^ "Case Docket: United Video Properties Inc., et al v. Amazon.Com Inc. et al". RECAP. Retrieved November 5, 2013.
  53. ^ Masnick, Mike (January 12, 2011). "Rovi Sues Amazon for Not Licensing its Electronic TV Guide Patent". Techdirt. Retrieved November 5, 2013.
  54. ^ Mullin, Joe (November 4, 2013). "Netflix roasts Rovi's 'Interactive TV guide' patents at ITC". Ars Technica. Retrieved November 5, 2013.
  55. ^ "California Enacts Law Requiring IMDb to Remove Actor Ages on Request". The Hollywood Reporter. Retrieved November 15, 2016.
  56. ^ "Judge Pauses Enforcement of IMDb Age Censorship Law". The Hollywood Reporter. Retrieved February 23, 2017.
Wikidata has the property:
  • IMDb – official site
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=IMDb&oldid=769179330"