Jump to content

Dark Enlightenment: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Reverted good faith edits by 188.47.96.57 (talk): Earlier version more closely reflects RS sources. (TW)
Line 20: Line 20:
In 2007 and 2008, American computer scientist [[Curtis Yarvin]], writing under the [[nom de plume]] ''Mencius Moldbug'', articulated what would develop into Dark Enlightenment thinking. Yarvin's theories were later the subject of English author and philosopher [[Nick Land]], who first coined the term "Dark Enlightenment" in his essay of the same name.<ref name="land-tde" /> The term "Dark Enlightenment" is a play-on-words for the knowledge supposedly gained in the [[Age of Enlightenment|Enlightenment]].<ref name="TDT"/><ref name="AS"/><ref name="TechCrunch: Geeks for Monarchy"/><ref name="SPLC">{{cite web |first=Jon|last=Phillips|url=https://secure.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all-issues/2014/fall/Troublesome-Sources|title=Troublesome Sources|website=Southern Poverty Law Center|date=Fall 2014}}</ref> According to Land: "Where the progressive enlightenment sees political ideals, the dark enlightenment sees appetites"<ref name="land-tde" />—on the view that the tendency of sovereign power (in democracies) is to devour society.
In 2007 and 2008, American computer scientist [[Curtis Yarvin]], writing under the [[nom de plume]] ''Mencius Moldbug'', articulated what would develop into Dark Enlightenment thinking. Yarvin's theories were later the subject of English author and philosopher [[Nick Land]], who first coined the term "Dark Enlightenment" in his essay of the same name.<ref name="land-tde" /> The term "Dark Enlightenment" is a play-on-words for the knowledge supposedly gained in the [[Age of Enlightenment|Enlightenment]].<ref name="TDT"/><ref name="AS"/><ref name="TechCrunch: Geeks for Monarchy"/><ref name="SPLC">{{cite web |first=Jon|last=Phillips|url=https://secure.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all-issues/2014/fall/Troublesome-Sources|title=Troublesome Sources|website=Southern Poverty Law Center|date=Fall 2014}}</ref> According to Land: "Where the progressive enlightenment sees political ideals, the dark enlightenment sees appetites"<ref name="land-tde" />—on the view that the tendency of sovereign power (in democracies) is to devour society.


Yarvin first used the term "neo-reactionary" as an adjective in this context.<ref name="UR: a jacobite history of the world">{{cite web |url=http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.co.uk/2008/05/ol3-jacobite-history-of-world.html |website=Unqualified Reservations |title=OL3: the Jacobite history of the world |date=May 1, 2008 |first=Mencius |last=Moldbug}}</ref><ref name="UR: a simple sovereign bankruptcy procedure">{{cite web |url=http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.co.uk/2008/06/olx-simple-sovereign-bankruptcy.html |website=Unqualified Reservations |title=OLX: a simple sovereign bankruptcy procedure |date=June 19, 2008 |first=Mencius |last=Moldbug}}</ref> He had originally called his ideology "formalism",<ref>{{Cite web|title = A formalist manifesto|url = http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.com/2007/04/formalist-manifesto-originally-posted.html|website = Unqualified Reservations|accessdate = 21 June 2015|date = 23 April 2007|last = Moldbug|first = Mencius}}</ref> but [[Arnold Kling]] used the term "The Neo-Reactionaries" as a noun in July 2010 to describe Moldbug and fellows and the term was quickly adopted by the subculture.<ref name="TechCrunch: Geeks for Monarchy" /><ref>{{cite web|url=http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2010/07/the_neo-reactio.html|first=Arnold|last=Kling|authorlink=Arnold Kling|title=The Neo-Reactionaries|work=EconLog|publisher=Library of Economics and Liberty|date=18 July 2010|accessdate=21 June 2015}}</ref>
Yarvin first used the term "neo-reactionary" as an adjective in this context.<ref name="UR: a jacobite history of the world">{{cite web |url=http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.co.uk/2008/05/ol3-jacobite-history-of-world.html |website=Unqualified Reservations |title=OL3: the Jacobite history of the world |date=May 1, 2008 |first=Mencius |last=Moldbug}}</ref><ref name="UR: a simple sovereign bankruptcy procedure">{{cite web |url=http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.co.uk/2008/06/olx-simple-sovereign-bankruptcy.html |website=Unqualified Reservations |title=OLX: a simple sovereign bankruptcy procedure |date=June 19, 2008 |first=Mencius |last=Moldbug}}</ref> He had originally called his ideology "formalism",<ref>{{Cite web|title = A formalist manifesto|url = http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.com/2007/04/formalist-manifesto-originally-posted.html|website = Unqualified Reservations|accessdate = 21 June 2015|date = 23 April 2007|last = Moldbug|first = Mencius}}</ref> but [[Arnold Kling]] used the term "The Neo-Reactionaries" as a noun in July 2010 to describe Moldbug and fellows and the term was quickly adopted by the subculture.<ref name="TechCrunch: Geeks for Monarchy" />


[[George Orwell]] also used the term "neo-reactionary" in 1943, in an [[As I Please]] column for ''[[Tribune (magazine)|Tribune]]''.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://telelib.com/authors/O/OrwellGeorge/essay/tribune/AsIPlease19431224.html |title=As I Please |work=Tribune |date=24 December 1943 |first=George |last=Orwell }}</ref>
[[George Orwell]] also used the term "neo-reactionary" in 1943, in an [[As I Please]] column for ''[[Tribune (magazine)|Tribune]]''.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://telelib.com/authors/O/OrwellGeorge/essay/tribune/AsIPlease19431224.html |title=As I Please |work=Tribune |date=24 December 1943 |first=George |last=Orwell }}</ref>

Revision as of 23:04, 22 March 2017

The Dark Enlightenment, or the neoreactionary movement—also known simply as neoreaction and abbreviated NRx by its proponents—is an anti-democratic and reactionary movement. It broadly rejects egalitarianism and the view that history shows inevitable progression towards greater liberty and enlightenment (thus, it is in part a reaction against "Whig historiography").[1][2] The movement favors a return to older societal constructs and forms of government, including support for monarchism or other forms of strong, centralised leadership such as a "neocameralist CEO",[3] coupled with a libertarian or otherwise conservative approach to economics.[4] Proponents generally also espouse socially conservative views on such matters as gender roles, race relations, and migration.

A 2013 TechCrunch article describes "neoreactionaries" as a term applied to, and sometimes a self-description of, an informal "community of bloggers" and political theorists who have been active since the 2000s.[5] Steve Sailer and Hans-Hermann Hoppe are described as "contemporary forerunners" of the movement, and neoreactionaries are also said to draw influence from philosophers such as Thomas Carlyle and Julius Evola.[5]

Some consider the Dark Enlightenment an early school of thought in the Alt-Right.[6] Some critics have also labeled the movement as "neo-fascist".[2][7]

Summary of core ideas

Some of the impetus for the neoreactionary movement comes from libertarians like Peter Thiel, as indicated by Nick Land's essay The Dark Enlightenment:

One milestone was the April 2009 discussion hosted at Cato Unbound among libertarian thinkers (including Patri Friedman and Peter Thiel) in which disillusionment with the direction and possibilities of democratic politics was expressed with unusual forthrightness. Thiel summarized the trend bluntly: “I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible.”[8]

Land expands on these themes as follows:

For the hardcore neo-reactionaries, democracy is not merely doomed, it is doom itself. Fleeing it approaches an ultimate imperative. The subterranean current that propels such anti-politics is recognizably Hobbesian, a coherent dark enlightenment, devoid from its beginning of any Rousseauistic enthusiasm for popular expression.

Etymology

In 2007 and 2008, American computer scientist Curtis Yarvin, writing under the nom de plume Mencius Moldbug, articulated what would develop into Dark Enlightenment thinking. Yarvin's theories were later the subject of English author and philosopher Nick Land, who first coined the term "Dark Enlightenment" in his essay of the same name.[8] The term "Dark Enlightenment" is a play-on-words for the knowledge supposedly gained in the Enlightenment.[2][4][5][9] According to Land: "Where the progressive enlightenment sees political ideals, the dark enlightenment sees appetites"[8]—on the view that the tendency of sovereign power (in democracies) is to devour society.

Yarvin first used the term "neo-reactionary" as an adjective in this context.[10][11] He had originally called his ideology "formalism",[12] but Arnold Kling used the term "The Neo-Reactionaries" as a noun in July 2010 to describe Moldbug and fellows and the term was quickly adopted by the subculture.[5]

George Orwell also used the term "neo-reactionary" in 1943, in an As I Please column for Tribune.[13]

See also

References

  1. ^ Pein, Corey (May 19, 2014). "Mouthbreathing Machiavellis Dream of a Silicon Reich". The Baffler. Archived from the original on February 9, 2015.
  2. ^ a b c Bartlett, Jamie (20 January 2014). "Meet The Dark Enlightenment: sophisticated neo-fascism that's spreading fast on the net". The Daily Telegraph.
  3. ^ Gray, Rosie (February 10, 2017). "Behind the Internet's Anti-Democracy Movement". The Atlantic.
  4. ^ a b Walther, Matthew (January 23, 2014). "The Dark Enlightenment Is Silly Not Scary". The American Spectator. Retrieved 2 October 2014.
  5. ^ a b c d Finley, Klint (22 November 2013). "Geeks for Monarchy: The Rise of the Neoreactionaries". TechCrunch.
  6. ^ Gray, Rosie (28 December 2015). "How 2015 Fueled The Rise Of The Freewheeling, White Nationalist Alt Right Movement". BuzzFeed. Retrieved 2016-08-09.
  7. ^ Sigl, Matt (2 December 2013). "The Dark Enlightenment: The Creepy Internet Movement You'd Better Take Seriously". Vocativ. Archived from the original on 17 December 2013.
  8. ^ a b c Land, Nick. "The Dark Enlightenment".
  9. ^ Phillips, Jon (Fall 2014). "Troublesome Sources". Southern Poverty Law Center.
  10. ^ Moldbug, Mencius (May 1, 2008). "OL3: the Jacobite history of the world". Unqualified Reservations.
  11. ^ Moldbug, Mencius (June 19, 2008). "OLX: a simple sovereign bankruptcy procedure". Unqualified Reservations.
  12. ^ Moldbug, Mencius (23 April 2007). "A formalist manifesto". Unqualified Reservations. Retrieved 21 June 2015.
  13. ^ Orwell, George (24 December 1943). "As I Please". Tribune.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dark_Enlightenment&oldid=771683518"