Talk:Glomeromycota: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:40, 7 May 2017

Fungi Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Fungi portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fungi, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fungi on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FungiWikipedia:WikiProject FungiTemplate:WikiProject FungiFungi articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Soil Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Earth sciences portal Glomeromycota is within the scope of WikiProject Soil, which collaborates on Soil and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.SoilWikipedia:WikiProject SoilTemplate:WikiProject SoilSoil articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ecoriam (article contribs).

Number of species

How many species are in this division? --Savant13 14:00, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

number of phyla

I deleted the reference to "the six recognised fungal phyla" because I thought it was repetition of what anybody that wants to know this can find out from fungus. Secondly, it is misleading as there are plenty of fungi that are not included in these six (e.g. Zoopagomycotina, Kickxellomycotina, etc...), so the true number is 7,8, possibly 9. Opening an article in this way is very waffly. Bendž|Ť 20:31, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well I certainly appreciate the fact that you edit many of the fungal pages in Wikipedia and are well up on recent literature, but "waffly" really does not apply here. Basically what you are saying is that the group of 67 professional mycologists worldwide from Canada, China, Estonia, France, Germany, Japan, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, the Netherlands, the USA, and the UK, who for the first time ever have reached a consensus based upon recent molecular data, and who hesitated to recognize where Zoopagomycotina etc. go, but did recognized 6 phyla at this time, are waffling. How is citing it this way misleading? Yes, there may be more recognizd in the future, but for now, given the reference, only 6 were "recognized". Heliocybe 12:00, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PHYLA

Since when this division/taxomal group of Fungi is called phylum? Biology by S.Mader (1999 and 2008 published biology books suggest that it has to be called Class, not phylum)! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.57.148.86 (talk) 21:31, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{WikiProject Fungi|importance=mid|class=start}}
 {{Soil|class=Start|importance=Mid}}
+{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/University_of_Washington/Physiology_of_Plant_Behavior_(Spring_2017) | assignments = [[User:Ecoriam|Ecoriam]] }}
 == Number of species ==