User talk:SportsAddicted: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 13:07, 4 September 2017

Template:Not here

Archives

/Archive1

Welcome to my talk page. Please keep the following in mind to keep the discussion together. If I left a message on your talk page, please reply there. I will have your talk page on my watchlist as long as the discussion continues. If you contact me here I will respond here, so make sure you put this page on your watchlist. Thanks!

Nationality transfers

Maar wat voor Susan de Kleine geldt, geldt voor bijna alle betrokken sporters. Bart Veldkamp, Marnix ten Kortenaar, Jos Lansink, Steffen Wesemann enz. hebben allemaal een dubbele nationaliteit: één van het land waar ze ooit voor uitkwamen, en één van het land waar ze nu voor uitkomen. Misschien is het beter om Wikipedia:WikiProject Sports en haar dochters in te schakelen, om te kijken hoe die denken over:
1. De criteria voor de list of nationality transfers; en
2. De verhouding tussen de nationality transfers en de dual nationality.
Ik heb wel contact gehad met de twee grondleggers van de List of nationality transfers in football, maar ik kreeg van één een halve reactie (niet zo gek, want die criteria zijn ongeveer anderhalf jaar geleden opgesteld, het is logisch dat ze niet precies meer weten hoe en wat), en van de ander nog helemaal niet. A ecis^Brievenbus 20:09, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Naja, dat weet ik dus niet of dat zo is. Ik weet bijvoorbeeld dat als iemand Nederlander wordt, diegene in principe zijn/haar originele nationaliteit verliest. In andere landen daarentegen schijnen ze daar veel minder strict in te zijn en kan het dus zijn dat een nationality transfer ook een dubbele nationaliteit oplevert, terwijl het bij andere inderdaad een transfer is en de originele daarmee dus vervalt. Maar goed, ik heb geen verstand van dit soort zaken en hoe die nu eigenlijk werken, maar had gehoopt dat jij er misschien iets meer over wist. SportsAddicted | discuss 23:15, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Garrinchab&w.jpg

I agree this does not count as a promotional image, but I didn't know much enough about the policies when I uploaded this image. Anyways, this is a deceased historical figure and no free alternative is available, nor can one be created, so I guess this is still a legal fair use image, although the rationale has to be changed. Cheers, SportsAddicted | discuss 22:19, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note that just because someone is dead, it doesn't means we have a legal blanket permission to use any copyrighted picture of this person. Indeed, the fact that someoneis not available for pictures actually increases the value of the existing copyrighted images, and weakens fair use claims. We should be carefull when selecting pictures of deceased ones. Best regards, --Abu badali ^(talk) 00:46, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that, but what makes this picture unable to use to describe the deceased person in question? I can't find a reason why this would not qualify compared to others which do. SportsAddicted | discuss 00:58, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The copyrights of this image is what makes it "unable to be used to describe the deceased person in question". The image belong to a company (Corbis) that charges anual fees for individuals who want to use one of its images. Wikipedia content, on the other side, is supposed to be free for anyone to use how many time they please for any reason. ---- —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Abu badali (talk • contribs) 05:44, 3 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

OK, I don't know Corbis, but from your comment I assume it's somehow the same sort of company as Getty Images is. That's a pity, but in that case we can't indeed do nothing about it. SportsAddicted | discuss 08:34, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Was a race?

was a race? isn't this current?! Ernst Stavro Blofeld 11:46, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry what exactly are you talking about? SportsAddicted | discuss 11:50, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see what you're talking about and fixed it. SportsAddicted | discuss 11:57, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cue sports

Brilliant job on Cue sports at the 2006 Asian Games! NB, you might want to join WikiProject Cue sports - we can certainly use more editors with your attention to detail and thoroughness! — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] ツ 19:08, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but I already have the project on my watchlist, however I'm not too keen on joining project like this as I'm interested in almost all sports and it would be hard to keep up if I would be a contributing member in these groups. I just do my things on Wikipedia and that will also mean that I work on cue sports every now and then :) Cheers, SportsAddicted | discuss 19:23, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BWF Super Series

SportsAddicted, i know you are the helpful person. Can i ask you to copyedit the BWF Super Series? there is very long, you can work it slowly or reject to do so, is never mind. However, if you willing to help, thanks and appreciated. --Aleen f1 17:47, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I will not reject that :) Although my English isn't the best either I will have a look at it and give it my best. Unfortunately not now, but within the next few days :) It depends on my time and schedule, but I promise to have a look at it. SportsAddicted | discuss 01:57, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

calendar of future events

I can't find the page where all the future events are listed... --Nitsansh 10:40, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The already stored events can be found at Calendar of current and future sports events/HS, while the others I collect from sites day by day via the sites listed at User:SportsAddicted/NextUp. Anyways, I was a few days away and have to see wether I can keep up with keeping it this detailed. Otherwise we should continue with only the bigger events or so. What do you think? SportsAddicted | discuss 08:59, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Tour of the Bahamas and 2007 Tour of the Bahamas

An editor has nominated Tour of the Bahamas, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tour of the Bahamas and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. TonyTheTiger 18:22, 10 February 2007 (UTC) Jayden54Bot 12:14, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar (a bit late, but still...)

		The Working Man's Barnstar
		I am a bit late, but Onomatopoeia, hereby award you with the Working Man's Barnstar award for all the time and effort you spent bettering the Feyenoord Rotterdam article, especially on January 23, 2007. I hereby want the same for Helmond Sport :D! —Onomatopoeia 12:47, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, your award was well-deserved. About Helmond Sport, it was more on a lighter side :D I follow Dutch soccer on NOS, and once talked with my Dutch colleague (Roda JC fan). He joked that losing to Helmond Sport — one of the tiniest clubs in the Netherlands — is seen as one of the worst insults in Dutch professional soccer. Seeing their utterly dreadful results (wikipedia.nl "Maar Helmond Sport komt van ver, want op dit moment staan ze tweede van onder en zal er nog heel wat veranderen moeten."), I have developed a soft spot for HS, just like for your "certified superplayer" Clyde Best. If you don't improve the Helmond Sport article, ok, if you do, even better! :D —Onomatopoeia 09:00, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, that's a fun story, good to see things like these happen all over the world even for tiny clubs like Helmond Sport. I'll see what I can do for you :) SportsAddicted | discuss 19:59, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:

Deleten lijkt me ook overbodig, heb inmiddels mijn mening geplaatst. Razororz 08:02, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Zijn we het daar in ieder geval over eens :) SportsAddicted | discuss 19:56, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Aviation proposal

There is currently a proposal to create an Aviation WikiProject, which would serve to clarify how all the aviation related projects relate, and help with interproject editing. See Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Aircraft#Proposal_Recap for how the projects hierarchy. Part of the reorganization proposes that, because of its very limited scope, WikiProject Red Bull Air Race World Series become a task force of Wikipedia:WikiProject_Aviation. For an idea of how task forces work, take a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_history. They have a number of task forces, listed here. As described by them, "task forces are informal groups of editors gathered for collaborative work on a particular topic within the field of military history; all project members are encouraged to participate in any that interest them." The benefit of such a system it that the sub-topics have all the resources of the overall project at their disposal. For instance, the Military history project banner, is placed on every military history page, and the related task forces are listed at the bottom of it. All military history related articles are thereby joined under one roof. I just happened to stumble upon your project, and had until now never realized it existed. By joining forces with another project you will benefit from increased exposure. If you have any ideas or comments, please join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft. - Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 02:28, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ben je er nog?

Hee, Ik vroeg me af of je gestopt was op Wikipedia... Hoop dat je het goed maakt. JACOPLANE • 2007-04-3 22:25

Ali Osram

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Ali Osram, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Propaniac 20:09, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Benthatcher.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Benthatcher.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 22:31, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:MariskaVeres.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:MariskaVeres.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Abu badali ^(talk) 15:38, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:07bayclassicseries.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:07bayclassicseries.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Fair use rationale for Image:SaidBakkati.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SaidBakkati.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Ilse @ 18:07, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:07bayclassicseries.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:07bayclassicseries.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksi_great (talk) 12:11, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:1984 Feyenoord Kampioen Cruijff.jpg

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:1984_Feyenoord_Kampioen_Cruijff.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[1][2]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. Ilse @ 14:45, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nationaal Archief

Thank you for uploading many images from the Nationaal Archief. Please note that the images from the Dutch National Archives are available "for non-commercial use only". Therefore the following images have the wrong license and will be deleted in the future, unless good reasons why they should be kept are provided along with the correct license information:

Thanks, Ilse @ 15:21, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationales

Thank you for uploading these Feyenoord logos. According to Wikipedia policy non-free images need a fair use rationale for every use in Wikipedia. The following images will be deleted on June 2, 2007 if no rationale is provided:

Thanks, Ilse @ 15:31, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images listed for deletion

Some of your images or media files have been listed for deletion. Please see Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion if you are interested in preserving them.

Thank you. Ilse @ 08:28, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SportsAddicted,

No time, no seen. You know, I am not good at sports articles, but your are. Please can you help me create the article, Hong Kong Basketball Association? I will be more than happy to know when you have to start it. Thanks very much! --Jacklau96 08:27, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Logo-Sky-Masters-Geconvert.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Logo-Sky-Masters-Geconvert.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:25, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Logo-Sky-Masters-Geconvert.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Logo-Sky-Masters-Geconvert.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:26, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images listed for deletion

Some of your images or media files have been listed for deletion. Please see Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion if you are interested in preserving them.

Thank you. Ilse @ 11:15, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images listed for deletion

Some of your images or media files have been listed for deletion. Please see Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion if you are interested in preserving them.

Thank you. Ilse @ 18:23, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Janwernerdanielsen.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Janwernerdanielsen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:05, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:AdrieVisser.jpg

I have tagged Image:AdrieVisser.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. MER-C 05:47, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Aladarpege.jpg

I have tagged Image:Aladarpege.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. MER-C 10:38, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Alanfletcher.jpg

I have tagged Image:Alanfletcher.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. MER-C 12:02, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:AlbertoSaavedra.jpg

I have tagged Image:AlbertoSaavedra.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. MER-C 12:05, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:AleksandarRankovic.jpg

I have tagged Image:AleksandarRankovic.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. MER-C 10:15, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AngeloMartha.jpg

I have tagged Image:AngeloMartha.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. MER-C 12:37, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RaimundRiedewald.jpg

I have tagged Image:RaimundRiedewald.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 03:23, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Arminjordan.jpg

I have tagged Image:Arminjordan.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. MER-C 09:55, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Hopmancup07russia.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Hopmancup07russia.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 19:51, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Benheppner.jpg

I have tagged Image:Benheppner.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. MER-C 09:19, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:SanneKeizer.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:SanneKeizer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:48, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

JacquelinePoelman.jpg

I have tagged Image:JacquelinePoelman.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Calliopejen1 22:50, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Henrytownsend.jpg

I have tagged Image:Henrytownsend.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Rette tast 18:56, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:SerginhoGreene.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:SerginhoGreene.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:43, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Hughkawharu.jpg

I have tagged Image:Hughkawharu.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Rette tast 18:53, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Edwardalbert.jpg

I have tagged Image:Edwardalbert.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Rette tast 18:46, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Supersportlogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Supersportlogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:25, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Thomasstewartsinger.jpg

I have tagged Image:Thomasstewartsinger.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Rette tast 12:46, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Feyenoordlogo2008.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Feyenoordlogo2008.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:22, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:MarleenVanIersel.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:MarleenVanIersel.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Pak21 08:52, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please note the same applies to all of Image:RebekkaKadijk.jpg, Image:PatriciaLabee.jpg, Image:MarritLeenstra.jpg, Image:MerelMooren.JPG, Image:MeredDeVries.jpg and Image:MarloesWesselink.jpg. In general, fair use images simply to show what a person looks like are not acceptable on Wikipedia. Cheers --Pak21 09:07, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:6daysofzurichlogo07.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:6daysofzurichlogo07.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:55, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Iihf logo jwch07.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Iihf logo jwch07.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:23, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Eerste Divisie 2006/2007

I have nominated a category you created, Category:Eerste Divisie 2006/2007, for deletion. Please join the discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 November 13#Category:Eerste Divisie 2006/2007. A ecis^Brievenbus 00:49, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FH07-jacobsen-bischofshofen.jpg

I have tagged Image:FH07-jacobsen-bischofshofen.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Rettetast (talk) 18:29, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

KNZB Dutch Short Course Swimming Championships 2006

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article KNZB Dutch Short Course Swimming Championships 2006, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of KNZB Dutch Short Course Swimming Championships 2006. TonyBallioni 03:12, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RobertZwinkels.jpg

I have tagged Image:RobertZwinkels.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 13:59, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Robertlong1985.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Robertlong1985.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:07, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Johnnyvaught.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Johnnyvaught.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:23, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:RoySchuiten.jpg

I have tagged Image:RoySchuiten.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 16:44, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Nkafstandenlogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Nkafstandenlogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:11, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:LeviSchwiebbe.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:LeviSchwiebbe.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:18, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SamirElMoussaoui.jpg

I have tagged Image:SamirElMoussaoui.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Rettetast (talk) 20:26, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FH07-kuttel-garmisch.jpg

I have tagged Image:FH07-kuttel-garmisch.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Rettetast (talk) 20:48, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FH07-jacobsen-innsbruck.jpg

I have tagged Image:FH07-jacobsen-innsbruck.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Rettetast (talk) 20:49, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tdu07logo.jpg

I have tagged Image:Tdu07logo.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 20:49, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barney_ladbrokes.jpg

I have tagged Image:Barney_ladbrokes.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Rettetast (talk) 20:50, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Doha_asian2006.jpg

I have tagged Image:Doha_asian2006.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Rettetast (talk) 20:52, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DominiqueCornu.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:DominiqueCornu.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ESSENT CUP 2007.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:ESSENT CUP 2007.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:15, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:GF World Cup 06.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:GF World Cup 06.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:47, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Muddywaters 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Muddywaters 2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:22, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Louisalbertvachon.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Louisalbertvachon.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:33, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:MirjamMelchers.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:MirjamMelchers.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:55, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jktlogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jktlogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:32, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Nevobologo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Nevobologo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:KonstantinosLoumpoutis.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:KonstantinosLoumpoutis.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:KristinArmstrong.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:KristinArmstrong.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:09, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Nhv logo-rond.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Nhv logo-rond.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Red Bull Task Force

The Red Bull task force is fairly quiet, and has a grand total of 21 articles in its scope, and 4 members. Since there are many articles in the air sports area that have no project to look after them, and since Red Bulls articles would fall under the air sports scope, would you object to the scope of the task force being expanded to include air sports, and the task force being renamed and retasked as the Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Air sports task force? - Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) —Preceding comment was added at 16:03, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nery Castillo

I have edited this page to try and raise it to the standard of good article, I have also listed it for good article review, it is on your list so I am letting you know Pbradbury (talk) 21:26, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Liverpool International Tennis Tournament

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Liverpool International Tennis Tournament, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Liverpool International Tennis Tournament. - Stephanie Daugherty (Triona) - Talk - Comment - 21:50, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Rsxworlds06.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Rsxworlds06.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:11, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Wpt2007.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Wpt2007.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 11:56, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sag2006Judo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Sag2006Judo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 12:30, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Santodomingo2006.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Santodomingo2006.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:10, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

KarstenKroon.jpg

I have tagged Image:KarstenKroon.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Rettetast (talk) 11:28, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MarcWauters.jpg

I have tagged Image:MarcWauters.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Rettetast (talk) 11:31, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Kinheimlogo.jpg

I have tagged Image:Kinheimlogo.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 11:31, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Logo_pioniers.gif

I have tagged Image:Logo_pioniers.gif as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 11:31, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MarianneVosProfile.jpg

I have tagged Image:MarianneVosProfile.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Rettetast (talk) 11:31, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MarianneVos_wins.jpg

I have tagged Image:MarianneVos_wins.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Rettetast (talk) 11:31, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Hseries2006logo.gif

I have tagged Image:Hseries2006logo.gif as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 11:32, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Marthaholmes.jpg

I have tagged Image:Marthaholmes.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 11:32, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CharlesLarson.jpg

I have tagged Image:CharlesLarson.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 11:32, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bozburrell.JPG

I have tagged Image:Bozburrell.JPG as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 11:33, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Enriquegorriaranmerlo.jpg

I have tagged Image:Enriquegorriaranmerlo.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 11:33, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Malcolmarnold.jpg

I have tagged Image:Malcolmarnold.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 11:34, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Patrickquinn.jpg

I have tagged Image:Patrickquinn.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 11:34, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Omaralfaruq.jpg

I have tagged Image:Omaralfaruq.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 11:34, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

StijnVreven.jpg

I have tagged Image:StijnVreven.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Rettetast (talk) 11:34, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PatrickvanBalkom.jpg

I have tagged Image:PatrickvanBalkom.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Rettetast (talk) 11:34, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

KimStaelensNED.jpg

I have tagged Image:KimStaelensNED.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Rettetast (talk) 16:32, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Logo knhb.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Logo knhb.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:40, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Vanessafernandes.JPG

A tag has been placed on Image:Vanessafernandes.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Vanessafernandes.JPG|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Sdrtirs (talk) 16:34, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2008 Summer Olympics/Qualification

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article 2008 Summer Olympics/Qualification, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Dana boomer (talk) 14:47, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Robertlong1989.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Robertlong1989.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:10, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Robertlong kleinsma.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Robertlong kleinsma.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:12, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:ShelbyWalker.jpg

I have tagged Image:ShelbyWalker.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 12:31, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sydthrift.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Sydthrift.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 19:08, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Stenandersson.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Stenandersson.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 19:17, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Finnopenec06.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Finnopenec06.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 06:31, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Harriet Johnson

Your page User:SportsAddicted/Sports biographies/Badminton has a link to Harriet Johnson. AFAICT, there has never been an article about this person. I created a disambiguation page, but because there is no article for the badminton player, that page has been converted to a redirect that points to an unrelated person. I suggest that you change your user page link to point to Harriet Johnson (badminton player) (a redlink). If you have content about this player, I suggest that you create Harriet Johnson (badminton player), then we can restore the disambiguation page. --Orlady (talk) 16:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Oscargonzalez.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Oscargonzalez.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:05, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:David_di_Tommaso.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:David_di_Tommaso.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. L u c t o r 19:36, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Honorees takemoto painting.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Honorees takemoto painting.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 20:03, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:TheoBosWorldRec.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:TheoBosWorldRec.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:18, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:DickJaspers.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:DickJaspers.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 72.88.104.182 (talk) 02:40, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An exciting opportunity to get involved!

As a member of the Aviation WikiProject or one of its subprojects, you may be interested in testing your skills in the Aviation Contest! I created this contest, not to pit editor against editor, but to promote article improvement and project participation and camraderie. Hopefully you will agree with its usefulness. Sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here. The first round of the contest may not start until September 1st-unless a large number of editors signup and are ready to compete immediately! Since this contest is just beginning, please give feedback here, or let me know what you think on my talkpage. - Trevor MacInnis ^contribs 05:21, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Terrysmith.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Terrysmith.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:42, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Beach Volleyball player infobox

Template:Beach Volleyball player infobox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for deletion page. Thank you. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:42, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LieseProkop.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LieseProkop.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:45, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Maartje Paumen

The article Maartje Paumen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable, short, no relevant info

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. iBen^discuss 06:09, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello SportsAddicted! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 134 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 212 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Dick Jaspers - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Giorgia Bronzini - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Andreas Anastasopoulos - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Jamel Ashley - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Koos Formsma - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Wang Lei (fencer) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Zsolt Nemcsik - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Irina Embrich - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Sven Järve - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Lei Sheng - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

More...

11. Won Woo-Young 12. Kim Hye-Lim 13. Emese Szász 14. Gauthier Grumier 15. Fabrice Jeannet 16. Eduardo Sepulveda Puerto 17. Juan Castañeda 18. Ignacio Canto 19. José Luis Abajo 20. Bogdan Nikishin 21. Maksym Khvorost 22. Dmitriy Karuchenko 23. Dmytro Chumak 24. Julia Khakimova 25. Ianna Rouzavina 26. Nam Hyun-Hee 27. Seo Mi-Jung 28. Jung Gil-Ok 29. Jeon Hee-Sok 30. Li Na (fencer) 31. Luo Xiaojuan 32. Zhang Li (fencer) 33. Zhong Weiping 34. Maureen Nisima 35. Dmytro Boiko 36. Vladimir Lukashenko 37. Oleg Shturbabin 38. Vincent Anstett 39. Nicolas Lopez 40. Boris Sanson 41. Nynke Klopstra 42. Chen Yibing 43. Feng Jing 44. Liang Fuliang 45. Ryosuke Baba 46. Yuki Yoshimura 47. Shun Kuwahara 48. Kenya Kobayashi 49. Yoo Won-Chul 50. Kim Soo-Myun 51. Kim Seung-Il 52. Kim Ji-Hoon 53. Dorjgotovyn Tserenkhand 54. Jang Sung-Ho 55. Yasuyuki Muneta 56. Tong Wen 57. Yang Xiuli 58. Pürevjargalyn Lkhamdegd 59. Kim Na-Young (judoka) 60. Askhat Zhitkeyev 61. Yeldos Ikhsangaliyev 62. Yekaterina Galkina 63. Margarita Fomina 64. Tomokazu Wakino 65. Viswash 66. Lai Yi-hsin 67. Lin Hua-shan 68. Qian Jialing 69. Yu Hui 70. Zhao Ling 71. Lee Tuk-young 72. Yun Mi-Jin 73. Jang Yong-Ho 74. Naji Al Ashwal 75. Md Mizanur Rahman 76. Kazi Yunus Ahmed 77. Md Abdur Rouf 78. Abu Salah Musa 79. Razu Ahmed 80. Mosharrof Hossain 81. Kamal Hossain (kabaddi) 82. Abul Kalam 83. Md Badsha Miah 84. Bozlur Rashid 85. Ziaur Rahman (kabaddi) 86. Mohammed Mozannal Haque 87. Ko Lai Chak 88. Chan Yun To 89. Cheung King Wai 90. Chan Wai Ki 91. Lee Ka Man 92. Ho Chi Ho 93. Chan Wai Kei 94. Zhang Rui 95. Hei Zhi Hong 96. Cheung Kai Tung 97. Lau Kwok Kin 98. Ngan Kwoon Yat Kevin 99. Wong Kam Kau 100. Cheung Yi Nei 101. Sabrina Lui 102. Yeung Chui Ling 103. Au Yeung Wai Sum 104. Pau Ming Wai Akina 105. Tsui Wan Yi 106. Chow Tsz Ki 107. Chan Ka Man 108. Mak Pui Hin 109. Orlando Trustfull 110. Arenda Grimberg 111. Hilde Quintens 112. Sanne Cant 113. Anja Nobus 114. Veerle Ingels 115. Susanne Juranek 116. Maryline Salvetat 117. Birgit Hollmann 118. Robert Verbeek 119. Terry Jenkins 120. Alan Tabern 121. Mark Ooijevaar 122. Yondi Schmidt 123. Tim Veldt 124. Roberto Chiappa 125. Jan van Eijden 126. Gerard Kerkum 127. Sophie Polkamp 128. Maartje Goderie 129. Floortje Engels 130. Nienke Kremers 131. Michelle van der Pols 132. Carlijn Welten 133. Carolien van Kilsdonk 134. Ingmar Berga

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:10, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Patty Stolzenbach

The article Patty Stolzenbach has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This badminton player does not meet WP:ATHLETE, as she has not "competed at the highest amateur level of a sport, usually considered to mean the Olympic Games or World Championships. She also does not meet WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Glenfarclas (talk) 22:29, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge

I have proposed that Category:2007 in snowboarding should be merged into "2007 in sports" as this category has not been continued for years past 2007 Hugo999 (talk) 01:24, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PROD

Just to let you know

Proposed deletion of Qormi Dingli Circuit

The article Qormi Dingli Circuit has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable amateur cycling event

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Megodbike (talk) 22:54, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ingrid Tuk

I saw that you were looking for an article on "Ineke Tuk" and I provided one (at least a start). --Whaledad (talk) 04:30, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:2007 in snowboarding

Articles for deletion nomination of Sports calendar October 2006

I have nominated Sports calendar October 2006, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sports calendar October 2006. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. WOSlinker (talk) 21:44, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Sports calendar November 2006

I have nominated Sports calendar November 2006, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sports calendar November 2006. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. WOSlinker (talk) 21:45, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Sports calendar December 2006

I have nominated Sports calendar December 2006, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sports calendar December 2006. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. WOSlinker (talk) 21:45, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Sports calendar January 2007

I have nominated Sports calendar January 2007, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sports calendar January 2007. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. WOSlinker (talk) 21:45, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Sports calendar December 2006

Hello SportsAddicted, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created, Sports calendar December 2006, has been marked for speedy deletion by User:TenPoundHammer. This has been done because the page is a recently created article that that duplicates an existing English Wikipedia topic (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add "{{hangon}}" to the page text, and edit the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at User talk:SDPatrolBot II. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see User talk:TenPoundHammer. Thanks, - SDPatrolBot II (talk) on behalf of TenPoundHammer (talk · contribs) 06:10, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:(1)

Template:(1) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 08:15, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eduardo Sepulveda Puerto

The article Eduardo Sepulveda Puerto has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced BLP, June 2009

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 14:42, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ignacio Canto

The article Ignacio Canto has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced BLP, June 2009

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 15:43, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:DARTS

WikiProject Darts invite

You have been invited to join WikiProject Darts. We are dedicated to improving and expanding darts-related articles on Wikipedia. You received this invitation due to your interest in darts and/or your edits to Darts-related articles. If you would like to join, please click here, and add your name to the bottom of the list of project members.

~~~~

Mr.Kennedy1 ^talk 13:32, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Hollandseries06 kinheim pioniers.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Hollandseries06 kinheim pioniers.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:05, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Heideman2006.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Heideman2006.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:05, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Naji Al-Ashwal

The article Naji Al-Ashwal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced BLP tagged since Feb 2009

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fayenatic (talk) 21:44, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chan Wai Ki for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Chan Wai Ki, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chan Wai Ki until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The Wordsmith^Communicate 21:18, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rune Massing

The article Rune Massing has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for athletes.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Neelix (talk) 03:27, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Canoeing at the 2006 South American Games

The article Canoeing at the 2006 South American Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced for over 4 years, fails WP:V. Also Wikipedia is not a sports almanac.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stifle (talk) 10:41, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Franciscofernandezochoa.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Franciscofernandezochoa.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Robert Weemeyer (talk) 06:15, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Patriciakennedylawford.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Patriciakennedylawford.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:49, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Buddykerr.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Buddykerr.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:18, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Elenamukhina2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Elenamukhina2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 20:00, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Yelenapetushkova2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Yelenapetushkova2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:05, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Gold medalists at the 2007 Winter Universiade

Category:Gold medalists at the 2007 Winter Universiade, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Courcelles 02:43, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Silver medalists at the 2007 Winter Universiade

Category:Silver medalists at the 2007 Winter Universiade, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Courcelles 02:43, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bronze medalists at the 2007 Winter Universiade

Category:Bronze medalists at the 2007 Winter Universiade, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Courcelles 02:43, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AMF worldcuplogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AMF worldcuplogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:31, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Knetemann.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Knetemann.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 17:18, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:06 strwc banner.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:06 strwc banner.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:42, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:PaulArizin1.JPG

A tag has been placed on File:PaulArizin1.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dman41689 (talk) 08:51, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Michelplasse.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Michelplasse.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:06, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Georgedoig.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Georgedoig.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:44, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Corvanderhart1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Corvanderhart1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 10:11, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Corvanderhart1959.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Corvanderhart1959.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 10:11, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Corvanderhart1972.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Corvanderhart1972.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 10:12, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Corvanderhart1972.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Corvanderhart1972.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 10:15, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Corvanderhart1972.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Corvanderhart1972.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 09:56, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Brca

Template:Brca has been nominated for merging with Template:Bronze3. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. SFB 20:44, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Goca

Template:Goca has been nominated for merging with Template:Gold1. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. SFB 20:45, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Sica

Template:Sica has been nominated for merging with Template:Silver2. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. SFB 20:46, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vishwas (archer)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vishwas (archer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Lakun.patra (talk) 19:55, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AlbertoSpencer.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AlbertoSpencer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:31, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Bredakolff.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bredakolff.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. B (talk) 04:06, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Robertlong.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Robertlong.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:32, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Alphonsehalimi.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Alphonsehalimi.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:08, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Andrassuto.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Andrassuto.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:06, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Telmo zarra.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Telmo zarra.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Adem20 (talk) 14:05, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:JanSchroder.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JanSchroder.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Bald Boris 02:52, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Feyenoord legioen.jpg

The file File:Feyenoord legioen.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned file, no foreseeable encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:07, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 987: / Line 987: @@
 Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#F5|section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> [[User:BaldBoris|Bald]][[User talk:BaldBoris|Boris]] 02:52, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
+==  [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:File:Feyenoord legioen.jpg]] ==
+[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|48px|]]
+The file [[:File:Feyenoord legioen.jpg]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32;because of the following concern:
+<blockquote>orphaned file, no foreseeable encyclopedic use</blockquote>
+While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].
+You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[File talk:Feyenoord legioen.jpg|the file's talk page]].
+Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Files for discussion|files for discussion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:Jon Kolbert|Jon Kolbert]] ([[User talk:Jon Kolbert|talk]]) 13:07, 4 September 2017 (UTC)