User talk:Taran Wanderer

Wow, am I ever sorry. I reviewed some of your other edits to find they were legit. All this "Bambifan101" nonsense has me tilting at windmills evry time I see an edit regarding "The Rescuers." Very, very sorry for the block. You're unblocked and good to go. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 15:33, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

PMDrive1061 has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

I know you're not. Given the sheer number of socks that Bambifan was involved in creating, I'm kicking myself for having assumed that a legit user doing good work on similar articles would get caught up in the action of diverting this looney tune. Thanks for being so gracious about this. I know I wouldn't be happy to log on and see that I've been blocked as a sockpuppet!  :) --PMDrive1061 (talk) 18:00, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Rescuers = Soundtrack

Hey, TW. Please see Talk:The Rescuers regarding your question about The Rescuers' Soundtrack section. Cactusjump (talk) 21:04, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

The Rescuers edits

I noticed you reverted two unconstructive edits made by a user named Bernard the Brave. I sent him a warning on his talk page to keep a record of it. If he continues to make unconstructive edits to The Rescuers, let's continue to notify him on his talk page to keep a log of his reverted work.  :) Cactusjump (talk) 15:38, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

I sent him another warning. Next time he does it, we'll recommend to WP:AIV. Cactusjump (talk) 17:01, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:D'Artagnan and Roquefort.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:D'Artagnan and Roquefort.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:06, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:El perro de Flandes.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:El perro de Flandes.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:19, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:El pequeño Lord.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:El pequeño Lord.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 18:00, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Heidi.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Heidi.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:38, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Katoli.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Katoli.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 23:09, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Non-Free rationale for File:Lucy1982.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Lucy1982.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:00, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Non-Free rationale for File:Las aventuras de Peter Pan.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Las aventuras de Peter Pan.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:33, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Administrator intervention

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. MegastarLV (talk) 19:37, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

July 2011

Your edit on the article La Mujer Perfecta has been identified as vandalism and has been reverted. And please stop disruptively editing articles by changing them to an improper English-language format (we're not using the Spanish-language format), which includes the title of the article as well as any other grammar. You have been warned multiple times, and if you continue, you will be blocked from editing. MegastarLV (talk) 04:36, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

English language format applies to English language only. As Wikipedia itself states, foreign languages have their own orthodox which is to be respected. So far, you've presented ZERO support from the Wikipedia guidelines. I'll continue to defend my case. T.W. (talk) 04:47, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

The Wikipedia system as a whole has no preferred language; that's why there are many Wikipedias. This Wikipedia, however, does prefer the language in which it is written; those who do not wish to write English should consider writing for the others: the Spanish Wikipedia is behind the link. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 17:57, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

I already answered to this nonsense, and you've still failed to provide valid policy support. When we type titles or quotations in foreign languages we're no longer writing in English, regardless of what Wikipedia we're using. Regardless, I don't care. The issue is already being addressed and specific policies are being requested on the matter. Have a good one. T.W. (talk) 19:18, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Your personal attack is duly restored, as a reply to the comment you misquote. Leave other people's comments alone - and please stay off my talkpage. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 19:13, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for demonstrating once again that you're only focused on childish arguing. Your arguments on the issue have all been invalidated, and your refusal to abide by kindly set regulations is another good reason to discard your comments and unsupported opinions. Good day. T.W. (talk) 19:21, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Pollyanna1986.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Pollyanna1986.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:30, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Animation#Individual releases by GoodTimes Entertainment

As it looks like you were the original creator of most if not all of these, your comments are welcome. postdlf (talk) 03:46, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. When you recently edited Celia en el mundo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Manuel Aguilar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Titles of foreign-language works

Accord to WP:CAPS: We are to utilized the capitalization found on English-language reliable sources for foreign-language works, not the native capitalization. Erick (talk) 00:10, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Las montañas de Ana.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Las montañas de Ana.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:42, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision Invitation!

	You are cordially invited to join WikiProject Eurovision!
	You appear to be someone that may be interested in joining WikiProject Eurovision. Please accept this formal invitation from a current member of the project. We offer a place for you to connect with users who also like Eurovision and facilitate team work in the development of Eurovision articles.
	If you decide to join the project, please add your name to this list, and add the project talk page to your watchlist.
	I hope you accept! - Wes Mᴥuse 23:26, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Diane Eskenazi

The article Diane Eskenazi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. Sources are not reliable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:43, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Diane Eskenazi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Diane Eskenazi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diane Eskenazi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:26, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Draft:Diane Eskenazi concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Diane Eskenazi, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Diane Eskenazi

Hello, Taran Wanderer. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Diane Eskenazi".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Diane Eskenazi}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:04, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Beauty and the Beast (1992 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Magical powers. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:08, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Taran Wanderer. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Taran Wanderer. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)