Talk:Dinesh D'Souza: Difference between revisions
→D'Souza promoted conspiracy theories: comment and support |
|||
Line 137: | Line 137: | ||
[[User:SPECIFICO |<b style="color: #0011FF;"> SPECIFICO</b>]][[User_talk:SPECIFICO | ''talk'']] 23:44, 31 May 2018 (UTC) |
[[User:SPECIFICO |<b style="color: #0011FF;"> SPECIFICO</b>]][[User_talk:SPECIFICO | ''talk'']] 23:44, 31 May 2018 (UTC) |
||
{{ping|Jytdog}} - fixing ping from preceding. [[User:SPECIFICO |<b style="color: #0011FF;"> SPECIFICO</b>]][[User_talk:SPECIFICO | ''talk'']] 23:45, 31 May 2018 (UTC) |
{{ping|Jytdog}} - fixing ping from preceding. [[User:SPECIFICO |<b style="color: #0011FF;"> SPECIFICO</b>]][[User_talk:SPECIFICO | ''talk'']] 23:45, 31 May 2018 (UTC) |
||
*'''Support''' {{U|D.Creish}}'s take on this. As currently written in Wiki-voice, the text of the content in question is incredibly POV, with is a vio of NPOV as well as [[WP:BLP]]. I am reverting it back to the NPOV version while discussion takes place here. The NPOV version gets the point across and is best to remain in the article for now, even if consensus decides on different wording. Pinging {{U|MelanieN}} to this discussion as she has demonstrated a great ability to rewrite POV content to a better compromise between editors challenging prose and NPOV/POV. '''<span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">[[User:Winkelvi|-- ψλ]]</span>''' ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">[[User_talk:Winkelvi|✉]] [[Special:Contributions/Winkelvi|✓]]</span> 00:06, 1 June 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:06, 1 June 2018
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dinesh D'Souza article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9Auto-archiving period: 365 days |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Dinesh D'Souza. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Dinesh D'Souza at the Reference desk. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on April 25, 2018. |
Semi-protected edit request on May 31, 2018
Template:Edit semi-protected - Indian American bio edit
In the first sentence, calling Dinesh D'Souza an Indian American is misleading. This means he was born in America and has Indian descent. However, he was born in India, came here for college, and became a naturalized citizen. To be accurate, it should make that distinction. Below are two options for editing the sentence to be accurate:
Dinesh Joseph D'Souza (/dɪˈnɛʃ dəˈsuːzə/; born April 25, 1961) is a naturalized American citizen of Indian descent, who is a conservative political commentator, author, filmmaker, and convicted felon.
OR
Dinesh Joseph D'Souza (/dɪˈnɛʃ dəˈsuːzə/; born April 25, 1961) is an Indian born, naturalized American citizen, who is a conservative political commentator, author, filmmaker, and convicted felon.
Party switch denial
Dinesh D'Souza heavily contributes to the increasingly popular in conservative circles worldview that the political parties in the United States never switched their ideologies, meaning that Klansmen and slaveowners are "leftist", the southern strategy never happened, and welfare is a new form of slavery. This is very often cited by conservative outlets such as prageru, national review and so on. The Big Lie: Exposing the Nazi Roots of the American Left, his newest book, relies completely on this thesis as well.
This should be significantly featured in the article. Lazybanshee (talk) 06:05, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
That comment in itself is biased. The parties never "switched sides" because why would one party choose to start being racist, xenophobic, chauvinistic, bigoted, and etc. This makes no sense. Perhaps both parties strive for the same goals and one party may have a problem with its history, being radical rather than leftist. The "switched sides" theory is both untrue and based on ignorance. Dinseh D'Souza's work is well researched and documented. ZandoviseZandovise (talk) 01:48, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
IQ?
There is nothing in this article about his IQ, which is reputed to be EXTREMELY high. Few, if any,, of his critics have extremely high IQ's. Timothy Horrigan (talk) 14:33, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Dinesh D'Souza. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100905041508/http://www.tkc.edu/abouttkc/president_pressrelease.html to http://www.tkc.edu/abouttkc/president_pressrelease.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120616171236/http://www.tkc.edu/media/newsrelease.asp?id=335 to http://www.tkc.edu/media/newsrelease.asp?id=335
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111031154139/http://richarddawkins.net/articles/643668-update-video-replaced-david-silverman-debates-dinesh-d-souza to http://richarddawkins.net/articles/643668-update-video-replaced-david-silverman-debates-dinesh-d-souza
- Added archive https://archive.is/20130129201603/http://www.newageislam.com/radical-islamism-and-jihad/is-islam-the-problem?-why-is-america-letting-bin-laden-define-islam%3F/d/1149 to http://www.newageislam.com/radical-islamism-and-jihad/is-islam-the-problem?-why-is-america-letting-bin-laden-define-islam%3F%2Fd%2F1149
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:35, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Father and Mother's Names, Family Clan, and other Pre-US information
Half of his life was in India and that seems to have been conveniently left out. Please add his parents names including his mother's maiden name. It's important in understanding his background in India. Names are connected to all sorts of social and cultural information in India. I hope they weren't originally removed or left out for that reason. Without them this page is missing the depth that Dinesh himself seeks in most of his investigations and research. Also add any information about his family clan in India, family social status etc from India. There's a lot missing here. Add them. It will be most enlightening. 1.10.217.84 (talk) 12:33, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
Balance in D'Souza article
I made a number of small changes here, in an attempt to improve the article, which is how Wikipedia is supposed to work. But a left-wing ideologue is undoing EVERY SINGLE EDIT, calling them "controversial", when the controversy exists only in his mind.
- "Media Matters for America" is a group bankrolled and run by hard left folks such as George Soros and David Brock. It was reported in mainstream media (such as Newsweek) after MMA brought down Don Imus, that MMA has full-time staffers monitoring talk-shows they deem conservative, listening for anything they can use to destroy the show's reputation. Portraying MMA as a neutral media observer is absurd.
- Alan Dershowitz is a life-long liberal, who recently has taken a handful of political positions that align with conservatives. This is not a matter of debate - Dershowitz has authored dozens of books, and is a frequent media presence; his liberal outlook cannot seriously be questioned. Lumping in Dershowitz as a conservative is simply false.
- Stating as fact, without any qualification, that the US "stole" Native American land, makes this page sound like a Howard Zinn exercise in anti-American polemics, and not like a Wikipedia page. Adding in the modifier "alleged" should hardly be deemed "controversial".
- And my last edit simply was for readability and clarity, and was in no way related to politics. That this editor removed that improvement as well, and somehow deemed it "controversial", reflects extremely poorly on his judgment.
It seems that Nicolas Maduro is masquerading as a Wikipedia editor. Vcuttolo (talk) 06:56, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 9 May 2018
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
When discussing the score on Rotten Tomatoes for "Hillary's America" the article omits the fact that the user reviews are 80% positive based on >13,500 reviews. 73.136.208.129 (talk) 12:22, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Please provide the article text you are proposing to add, its location, and the source you propose to cite in order to verify the text. SPECIFICO talk 13:45, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Add announcement of presidential pardon
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The Presidential announcement via Twitter on May 31, 2018 that D'Souza will be pardoned should be added to the felony conviction section.
The following text should be added:
On May 31, 2018, President Donald Trump announced via Twitter that D'Souza will be pardoned.[1]
- Already done ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 14:19, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
References
- ^ Trump, Donald. "Donald J. Trump on Twitter: "Will be giving a Full Pardon to Dinesh D'Souza today. He was treated very unfairly by our government!"". Twitter. Retrieved 31 May 2018.
As far as I'm aware you remain a convicted felon when pardoned.
Is that correct? If so, that description should not be removed from this article. ResistTheEnemy (talk) 15:13, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
America: Imagine the World Without Her
I've removed the one-sided political commentary from the "America: Imagine with World Without Her" section. This was selectively copied from America: Imagine the World Without Her, which references a whole variety of political commentary. There is zero reason for the section in this article to focus exclusively on conservative commentary. Either a summary of the variety of political commentary be included here, or readers can go to the film's article to read all available commentary in depth. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 16:03, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Recipients of American presidential pardons
Is this YET 'A DONE DEAL'? MaynardClark If the pardon has only been announced but not yet granted, should the Category be added at the bottom? (talk) 16:28, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
D'Souza promoted conspiracy theories
This is extensively sourced and uncontroversial. He hasn't "been criticized for espousing conspiracy theories" or whatever WP:WEASEL phrase was inserted into the article. When a bunch of RS say that D'Souza regularly promotes conspiracy theories, the RS are not "criticizing" him for it, they are merely describing him. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 23:06, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
- Review the RFC [1].
- Then list the sources and relevant text that support
Widely characterized as a provocateur and polemicist
(emphasis on widely) andhave been the subject of considerable controversy due to his promotion of false and unfounded conspiracy theories.
Reminder this is a BLP. D.Creish (talk) 23:13, 31 May 2018 (UTC)- There are multiple RS cited - read them. The RfC is about whether D'Souza should be labelled a "conspiracy theorist" (which he definitely is, and I'm sure a proper RfC where I substantiate it with reliable sources would deliver a clear and resounding verdict in favor of the label), but that's something different from whether he's promoted conspiracy theories (which is clearly the language that RS use). Snooganssnoogans (talk) 23:18, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
- I didn't ask whether there were RS. I asked you to specifically identify the sources and text that support those two claims, which WP:BURDEN requires you do. I'll wait but don't restore your edit until you do and without clear consensus. D.Creish (talk) 23:21, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
- Why are editors like this? Why is it so hard to just edit cooperatively? Do I really need to go and google "Dinesh D'Souza" + "provocateur", and then link the Google Search for you?[2] Do I really need to google "Dinesh D'Souza" + "polemic" and then link the Google Search for you?[3] The RS that are currently cited all explicitly say he's promoted unfounded and false conspiracy theories. You're editing the D'Souza page and you clearly know all of this. Why are you doing this, man? Snooganssnoogans (talk) 23:36, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
- I didn't ask whether there were RS. I asked you to specifically identify the sources and text that support those two claims, which WP:BURDEN requires you do. I'll wait but don't restore your edit until you do and without clear consensus. D.Creish (talk) 23:21, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
- There are multiple RS cited - read them. The RfC is about whether D'Souza should be labelled a "conspiracy theorist" (which he definitely is, and I'm sure a proper RfC where I substantiate it with reliable sources would deliver a clear and resounding verdict in favor of the label), but that's something different from whether he's promoted conspiracy theories (which is clearly the language that RS use). Snooganssnoogans (talk) 23:18, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
A few of the many references regarding conspiracy theories, per@JzG::
- Sammin, Kyle (15 August 2016). "If You Hate Hillary, You'll Love 'Hillary's America'". The Federalist.
- Sacks, Ethan (March 7, 2016). "Dinesh D'Souza releases first look at 'Hillary's America'". NY Daily News.
- Bowman, James (August 19, 2016). "Hillary's America — and Dinesh D'Souza's". The American Spectator.
- Shephard, Alex (5 August 2016). "How Bad Is Dinesh D'Souza's Hillary's America? A Conversation". New Republic.
- Weigel, David (27 January 2014). "Conspiracy of Dunces". Slate.
- Hoffman, Jordan (18 July 2016). "Hillary's America review – Dinesh D'Souza says: beware racist Democrat super-villains". The Guardian.
- Maloy, Simon (June 2, 2016). "Dinesh D'Souza returns: The credibility-free hack filmmaker has a bad theory of racial politics". Salon.
- Nelson, Rebecca (22 August 2016). "Dinesh D'Souza on His Batshit Hillary Doc, Donald Trump, and Why He Doesn't Think He's a Conspiracy Theorist". GQ.
- Peretz, Evgenia (May 2015). "Get a Rare Glimpse of Dinesh D'Souza's Life After Conviction". Vanity Fair.
- Burns, Alexander (January 24, 2014). "The unraveling of Dinesh D'Souza". Politico.
- Capehart, Jonathan (19 February 2015). "Rudy Giuliani dives into Dinesh D'Souza's anti-Obama dumpster". The Washington Post.
- Healy, Gene (4 September 2012). "Dinesh D'Souza Is the Right's Michael Moore". Reason.
That theory wasn't remotely credible when D'Souza advanced it in Forbes, and it's even more ludicrous on the silver screen.
- That last three in particular make it clear that even conservatives like David Frum have backed away from him as he gone more and more loony. The 1st ref above is right-wingish. The 2nd is generally right-wing. I am not aware of GQ having politics. The others are probably considered lefty.
So... this is pretty across-the-board, which is plenty broad to say it in WP's voice. Jytdog (talk) 07:50, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
Thank you Jytdog for those extensive and exhaustive citations. This should put to rest the concerns of the other disruptive editor that there are we are solely relying on a sources from a couple of reviewers. I would've included more since this debate re-opened, but we must await the page being unlocked from protective status. It is clear from those sources that are from reputable sources on all sides of the political spectrum that D'Souza is advancing conspiracy theories. There should no longer be a question of whether or not we include it as WP:DUE and WP:CITATION demand we accurately call this duck that quacks like a duck the duck it is. JzG
SPECIFICO talk 23:44, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
@Jytdog: - fixing ping from preceding. SPECIFICO talk 23:45, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
- Support D.Creish's take on this. As currently written in Wiki-voice, the text of the content in question is incredibly POV, with is a vio of NPOV as well as WP:BLP. I am reverting it back to the NPOV version while discussion takes place here. The NPOV version gets the point across and is best to remain in the article for now, even if consensus decides on different wording. Pinging MelanieN to this discussion as she has demonstrated a great ability to rewrite POV content to a better compromise between editors challenging prose and NPOV/POV. -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 00:06, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (actors and filmmakers) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (actors and filmmakers) articles
- Actors and filmmakers work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class Christianity articles
- Low-importance Christianity articles
- Start-Class Indian Christianity work group articles
- Low-importance Indian Christianity work group articles
- Indian Christianity work group articles
- WikiProject Christianity articles
- Start-Class India articles
- Low-importance India articles
- Start-Class India articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class Goa articles
- Low-importance Goa articles
- Start-Class Goa articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Goa articles
- WikiProject India articles
- Start-Class Creationism articles
- Low-importance Creationism articles
- Start-Class Intelligent design articles
- Low-importance Intelligent design articles
- Intelligent design articles
- WikiProject Creationism articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class Asian Americans articles
- Low-importance Asian Americans articles
- WikiProject Asian Americans articles
- Start-Class Dartmouth College articles
- Low-importance Dartmouth College articles
- WikiProject Dartmouth College articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Start-Class Alternative Views articles
- Low-importance Alternative Views articles
- WikiProject Alternative Views articles
- Unassessed Conservatism articles
- Unknown-importance Conservatism articles
- WikiProject Conservatism articles
- Unassessed Literature articles
- Unknown-importance Literature articles
- Selected anniversaries (April 2018)