User talk:RandNetter96: Difference between revisions
→Unexplained/unclear reversions: I have reverted an edit of yours on WP:BLP grounds |
RandNetter96 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 228: | Line 228: | ||
== Unexplained/unclear reversions == |
== Unexplained/unclear reversions == |
||
{{Discussion top|reason=I will work harder on identifying edits against policy. For now, this thread is going nowhere. [[User:RandNetter96|RandNetter96]] ([[User talk:RandNetter96|Talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/RandNetter96|Contributions]]) 00:26, 14 July 2018 (UTC)}} |
|||
Can you explain your reasoning for [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Simona_Halep&diff=850148304&oldid=850134818 this reversion]? Your pro forma edit-summary for this, and several other recent and fast-paced, reverts does not make the intention behind the revert clear. [[User:Abecedare|Abecedare]] ([[User talk:Abecedare|talk]]) 23:40, 13 July 2018 (UTC) |
Can you explain your reasoning for [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Simona_Halep&diff=850148304&oldid=850134818 this reversion]? Your pro forma edit-summary for this, and several other recent and fast-paced, reverts does not make the intention behind the revert clear. [[User:Abecedare|Abecedare]] ([[User talk:Abecedare|talk]]) 23:40, 13 July 2018 (UTC) |
||
:It had no sources. [[User:RandNetter96|RandNetter96]] ([[User talk:RandNetter96|Talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/RandNetter96|Contributions]]) 23:44, 13 July 2018 (UTC) |
:It had no sources. [[User:RandNetter96|RandNetter96]] ([[User talk:RandNetter96|Talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/RandNetter96|Contributions]]) 23:44, 13 July 2018 (UTC) |
||
Line 236: | Line 236: | ||
:::::Well the first is mos related, and the second looked strange at first glance. [[User:RandNetter96|RandNetter96]] ([[User talk:RandNetter96|Talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/RandNetter96|Contributions]]) 00:16, 14 July 2018 (UTC) |
:::::Well the first is mos related, and the second looked strange at first glance. [[User:RandNetter96|RandNetter96]] ([[User talk:RandNetter96|Talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/RandNetter96|Contributions]]) 00:16, 14 July 2018 (UTC) |
||
::::::I have reverted this edit of yours on WP:BLP grounds [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chinese_intelligence_activity_abroad&diff=850150955&oldid=850150627]. The IP is entirely correct, and the material does not belong in the article unless and until the allegations are proven in court. And I suggest you stop describing legitimate edits as 'vandalism'. [[Special:Contributions/2A00:23C1:8250:6F01:D023:5AC6:6F55:AC73|2A00:23C1:8250:6F01:D023:5AC6:6F55:AC73]] ([[User talk:2A00:23C1:8250:6F01:D023:5AC6:6F55:AC73|talk]]) 00:22, 14 July 2018 (UTC) |
::::::I have reverted this edit of yours on WP:BLP grounds [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chinese_intelligence_activity_abroad&diff=850150955&oldid=850150627]. The IP is entirely correct, and the material does not belong in the article unless and until the allegations are proven in court. And I suggest you stop describing legitimate edits as 'vandalism'. [[Special:Contributions/2A00:23C1:8250:6F01:D023:5AC6:6F55:AC73|2A00:23C1:8250:6F01:D023:5AC6:6F55:AC73]] ([[User talk:2A00:23C1:8250:6F01:D023:5AC6:6F55:AC73|talk]]) 00:22, 14 July 2018 (UTC) |
||
:::::::It is properly sourced and is relevant. [[User:RandNetter96|RandNetter96]] ([[User talk:RandNetter96|Talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/RandNetter96|Contributions]]) 00:26, 14 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
{{discussion bottom}} |
Revision as of 00:27, 14 July 2018
If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~
Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.
Thank you!
For an archive of past discussions, see here.
UTC Time:
November 15, 2024 Current UTC time and date ( )
|
RandNetter96, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Hi RandNetter96! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 7 July 2018 (UTC) |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:23, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
backdraft edits
last month you reverted my edits to Backdraft (film) about the proposed sequel.. While I did neglect to include a reference, I did manage to find one in a faster amount of time than it would have taken to revert my edits and add a message on my talk page... Google is at your fingertips.... Moreover, a citation needed tag on the actual page would have sufficed. --74.103.142.20 (talk) 23:06, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Unexplained/unclear reversions
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- I will work harder on identifying edits against policy. For now, this thread is going nowhere. RandNetter96 (Talk) (Contributions) 00:26, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Can you explain your reasoning for this reversion? Your pro forma edit-summary for this, and several other recent and fast-paced, reverts does not make the intention behind the revert clear. Abecedare (talk) 23:40, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- It had no sources. RandNetter96 (Talk) (Contributions) 23:44, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- What kind of sources do you think would be needed to support inclusion of this photograph?! Please stop patrolling recent edits, and concentrate on writing or cleaning up a single article of your choice till you are more familiar with wiipedia policies. Abecedare (talk) 00:02, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- I confused it for another revision. Sorry for the mistake. RandNetter96 (Talk) (Contributions) 00:05, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- Care to explain the reasoning behind this or this revert (both were done with non-informative edit-summaries)? Abecedare (talk) 00:09, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- Well the first is mos related, and the second looked strange at first glance. RandNetter96 (Talk) (Contributions) 00:16, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- I have reverted this edit of yours on WP:BLP grounds [1]. The IP is entirely correct, and the material does not belong in the article unless and until the allegations are proven in court. And I suggest you stop describing legitimate edits as 'vandalism'. 2A00:23C1:8250:6F01:D023:5AC6:6F55:AC73 (talk) 00:22, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- It is properly sourced and is relevant. RandNetter96 (Talk) (Contributions) 00:26, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- I have reverted this edit of yours on WP:BLP grounds [1]. The IP is entirely correct, and the material does not belong in the article unless and until the allegations are proven in court. And I suggest you stop describing legitimate edits as 'vandalism'. 2A00:23C1:8250:6F01:D023:5AC6:6F55:AC73 (talk) 00:22, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- Well the first is mos related, and the second looked strange at first glance. RandNetter96 (Talk) (Contributions) 00:16, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- Care to explain the reasoning behind this or this revert (both were done with non-informative edit-summaries)? Abecedare (talk) 00:09, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- I confused it for another revision. Sorry for the mistake. RandNetter96 (Talk) (Contributions) 00:05, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- What kind of sources do you think would be needed to support inclusion of this photograph?! Please stop patrolling recent edits, and concentrate on writing or cleaning up a single article of your choice till you are more familiar with wiipedia policies. Abecedare (talk) 00:02, 14 July 2018 (UTC)