User talk:65.111.114.121: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 05:02, 17 September 2018

September 2018

Hello, I'm GorillaWarfare. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Hervé Jaubert, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. GorillaWarfare (talk) 04:23, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Howdy

Editing out entire well referenced paragraphs when a change of language would suffice, borders on vandalism and seems like an excuse to censor content.

Noticeably contributions from following users have been largely focused on few articles with similar edit pattern. If it is same person behind these, please consider having an account or logging in before editing.

2605:6000:E914:6C00:A584:195B:EDF5:3DE3

2605:6000:E914:6C00:F1AB:EEE7:6B05:1757

Ohsin 17:05, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An untrue statement referred to paragraphs were not well referenced and in some cases articles that were used as a citation did not even include statements that were derived from it.

No personal attacks

I advise you to refrain from alleging unsubstantiated political agendas, as you did in this edit summary. Please see Wikipedia:No personal attacks. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:39, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Criticism of Islam. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia.

You seem to be under the impression that the article is a forum for responding to criticism. It is not. It is not a venue for presenting counterpoints. The article is about criticism, not your own responses to it. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:02, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 ==NPOV==
-[[File:Information orange.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own [[Wikipedia:No original research|personal analysis]] to Wikipedia articles, as you did to [[Criticism of Islam]]. Doing so violates Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view policy]] and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia.  Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-npov2 --> ~[[User:Anachronist|Anachronist]] <small>([[User talk:Anachronist|talk]])</small> 04:39, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
+[[File:Information orange.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own [[Wikipedia:No original research|personal analysis]] to Wikipedia articles, as you did to [[Criticism of Islam]]. Doing so violates Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view policy]] and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia.
+You seem to be under the impression that the article is a forum for responding to criticism. It is not. It is not a venue for presenting counterpoints. The article is ''about'' criticism, not your own responses to it. ~[[User:Anachronist|Anachronist]] <small>([[User talk:Anachronist|talk]])</small> 05:02, 17 September 2018 (UTC)