User talk:Helloman124: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:39, 18 September 2018

Welcome!

Hello, Helloman124, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! SwisterTwister talk 01:19, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Australian Survivor articles

Hi, I've reverted a number of your edits across multiple articles related to Australian Survivor, in which you have retitled the second season of the program as Australian Celebrity Survivor: Vanuatu. This is not a commonly used title for the program, and in references to the program I could find, the common names are Australian Celebrity Survivor and Celebrity Survivor. If you can provide reliable citations that support your title claim, please add them to the articles and re-add your contributions.

Additionally, the article you created, List of Australian Survivor episodes, does not contain a single reliable reference and is as risk of being deleted. Please add reliable in-line citations to the article to support your claims. Thanks -- Whats new?^(talk) 05:48, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please avoid changing "Trump" to "Drumpf"

Hi Helloman124. In one of your recent edits, you changed the word "Trump" to "Drumpf". I assume that this was unintentional and caused by having the Drumpfinator extension enabled. To avoid this kind of mistake in the future, please disable the extension before editing articles that mention Trump. Thank you. —Granger (talk · contribs) 06:09, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you recently removed some content from List of Survivor (Australian TV Series) contestants with this edit, without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 07:05, 7 May 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Edit summaries

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! -- Whats new?^(talk) 06:29, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Moving content

Please say in the edit summary were it was moved from. best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:08, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Celebrity Survivor

Regarding your constant edits of this manner across multiple articles about this subject, Celebrity Survivor is the shortform of Australian Celebrity Survivor, NOT Survivor: Vanuatu. Unless you can find a reliable official citation of the latter's common usage DON'T RE-ADD IT. I've raised this issue with you previously. If you wish to discuss it further or taking dispute resolution measures, please reply here or add a message to my talk page. Thanks -- Whats new?^(talk) 06:49, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Date formatting

Hi, just to let you know I've reverted your edit to Australian Survivor (season 1), because you added commas to dates where not acceptable once again. Please see MOS:DATEFORMAT for examples of how to correctly format dates in articles. -- Whats new?^(talk) 23:40, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per your revert, please read MOS:BADDATE. It shows 3 July 2001 is acceptable whereas 3 July, 2001 is NOT acceptable, stating clearly "No comma between month and year". -- Whats new?^(talk) 07:39, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"American Survivor" vs. "American version of Survivor"

Hey! Couldn't fit my response to your edit summary in an edit summary, so here's the full thing: You've referred to the phrase "American Survivor" as "accepted short hand" for "the American edition of Survivor." According to WP:SLANG, "formal tone means that the article should not be written using argot, slang, colloquialisms, doublespeak, legalese, or jargon that is unintelligible to an average reader; it means that the English language should be used in a businesslike manner." If "American Survivor" is "short hand" (or slang) as you say (and I agree), then it would fall under what the quote from WP:SLANG says to avoid including. - Katanin (talk) 20:58, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Australian Survivor 3 Cast.jpeg

Thank you for uploading File:Australian Survivor 3 Cast.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 23:22, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Australian Survivor 1 Cast.jpeg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Australian Survivor 1 Cast.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. -- Whats new?^(talk) 07:33, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Australian Survivor (season 3), did not appear constructive and has been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Chase (talk) 22:35, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ratings table

Hi, in regards to your twice reverting of my removal of the demos from the ratings table at Zumbo's Just Desserts, the reasons I have given you for removing them are the fact they are incomplete, and including the 18-49 demo is not standard in reporting on Austraian ratings (it is in America, but total people is the widely reported metric in Australia). Additionally, not all Australian television networks target the same demographics, which again is unlike American networks who do focus on the 18-49. For example, Network Ten has stated they have moved their focus from 16-39 to the 25-54 demo. Neither of those are the 18-49 range. If you wish to discuss further, please do reply and if necessary we can take formal measures to obtain a concensus. Saying the table exists on other pages is not wholly relevant, and frankly if I were to come across this on other pages I would likely remove them there is circumstances were similar. -- Whats new?^(talk) 22:35, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted your edit for the same reasoning at Australian Survivor (season 3). Please engage in discussion on the article's talk page or here if you continue to disagree or have relevant points to raise. -- Whats new?^(talk) 01:54, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bare URLs

I think this, Wikipedia:Bare URLs, would be a great read for you. Thank you. Chase (talk) 21:24, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. It would be greatly helpful to understand your intent on articles if you used the edit summary more often. It is unclear sometimes why you are adding something back or adding something in the first place. Thank you. Chase (talk) 21:28, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Explain your edits please

Multiple users have repeatedly asked you to explain reasons for your edits via edit summaries. Please use edit summaries EVERY time you make an edit. This incudes when you add content, delete content or change content. Give a brief reason in the edit summary box every time, to help other identify what changes were made, and to help you justify why the edits are better. Thank you. -- Whats new?^(talk) 03:43, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Hello, I'm Whats new?. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Australian Survivor (season 3), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The information you added is likely correct, but it needs to be sourced. The existing references do not state or support what you claimed. Please do add the information back with a reference. -- Whats new?^(talk) 08:59, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dianne Wiest. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Majora (talk) 00:29, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Helloman124. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Aus Survivor 3 Cast.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Aus Survivor 3 Cast.JPG. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or provided a license tag. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, select the appropriate license tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you can't find a suitable license tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:37, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Aus Survivor 1 Cast.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Aus Survivor 1 Cast.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Whats new?^(talk) 22:35, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Australian Celebrity Survivor Cast.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Australian Celebrity Survivor Cast.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. -- Whats new?^(talk) 07:08, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

In the following edit: [1], you reinstated material that was clearly denoted to have been removed as advertising and promotion. If you reinstate material, you take responsibility for it. You may neither write nor restore promotional content, as that is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Beyond that, I see several issues with copyright put forth here, and people asking you to explain why it is you're doing what you're doing. When other editors express concerns with your editing, it is required that you engage with them and discuss the matter, or, at very minimum, stop doing it. You may not ignore them and continue to plow ahead. If this behavior continues, or you continue going on ahead while still refusing to discuss, you will be blocked from editing. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 23:35, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Friendly Reminder

Hello, I'm Hawkeye75. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.

March 2017

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Big Brother 15 (U.S.). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. –Davey2010^Talk 13:27, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Davey2010, Helloman124 had a point. I saw you reverting all of the correct reverts. You don't need a source for a list. Hawkeye75 (talk) 02:46, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hawkeye75 - Editors/IPs are constantly changing names to fictitious ones on all BB articles, Do you actually know they're correct ?. Thanks. –Davey2010^Talk 03:43, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, search up "Big Brother 15" on Google and you can find the CBS page with the official cast. Hawkeye75 (talk) 03:44, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well I have no idea who vandalised it then, Seeing as older american BB sites don't seem to have lists I assumed this was another,

Anyway Helloman124 infuture please use the edit summary or talkpage to explain reverts - It'd save us all time and patience. –Davey2010^Talk 03:54, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Helloman124 reported by User:Davey2010 (Result: ). Thank you. –Davey2010^Talk 03:41, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:45, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oshwah, you should unblock this user. Reverting vandalism is not "edit warring". This is an unacceptable block. -Hawkeye75 (talk) 03:58, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

With the greatest of respect he still edit warred, Yes I admit I didn't visit the talkpage however he was left with helpful edit summaries as well as the edit warring warning, He chose not to communicate and therefore blocking was the correct course of action. –Davey2010^Talk 04:01, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

He technically didn't edit war under WP:EW though. -Hawkeye75 (talk) 04:03, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree - He was edit warring and as I said failed to communicate with me or anyone, I'm sure once the 24hours is up he'll realise in future when ever an edit war occurs he must discuss it or atleast communicate in some way. –Davey2010^Talk 04:09, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Big Brother (U.S. TV series), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. TheDoctorWho (talk) 05:49, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Big Brother (U.S. TV series). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. TheDoctorWho (talk) 06:22, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Big Brother (U.S. TV series).

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. I agree that the information you keep adding to the article about the Battle Back needs to be added, however because it was not referred to as the Battle Back Competition it either needs to be added in a NEW OR SEPARATE section. Please do not add it in the same section again!!! TheDoctorWho (talk) 12:43, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Big Brother (U.S. TV series). I presented the information in a different section of the article. In the future you should do that as anything before BB18 was not a competition and did NOT belong in the COMPETITION section!!!! TheDoctorWho (talk) 02:01, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Helloman124. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Love Island Australia

Thank you for your contributions to Love Island Australia. However, I have reverted your edits as they do not conform with the discussions held on the wiki's talk page Talk: Love Island Australia. Please refrain from reverting back to your edits. Looking through your talk page, it is very clear that you have made numerous unconstructive edits across multiple pages. I suggest you read wikipedia's List of policies specifically the Editing policies. Broadwaygenius (talk) 13:34, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Australian Survivor season 3 alternative logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Australian Survivor season 3 alternative logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Further edit summary reminder

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! -- Whats new?^(talk) 06:24, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Australian Survivor: Champions vs. Contenders. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Use the talk page instead of constantly reverting. VietPride10 (talk) 15:13, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Australian Survivor: Champions vs. Contenders, you may be blocked from editing. Use the talk page, instead of making invalid justifications "looking messy" is not a valid justification. VietPride10 (talk) 14:15, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Australian Survivor: Champions vs. Contenders. Use the talk page, instead of constantly reverting. There are no valid justifications for reverting the agreed-upon content (as you are the only one disagreeing. ) VietPride10 (talk) 01:39, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 236: / Line 236: @@
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents|Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]].
 If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at [[:Australian Survivor: Champions vs. Contenders]], you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]. ''Use the talk page, instead of making invalid justifications "looking messy" is not a valid justification. ''<!-- Template:uw-disruptive3 --> [[User:VietPride10|VietPride10]] ([[User talk:VietPride10|talk]]) 14:15, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
+[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=Stop icon]] You may be '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]] without further warning''' the next time you [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disrupt]] Wikipedia, as you did  at [[:Australian Survivor: Champions vs. Contenders]]. ''Use the talk page, instead of constantly reverting. There are no valid justifications for reverting the agreed-upon content (as you are the only one disagreeing. )''<!-- Template:uw-generic4 --> [[User:VietPride10|VietPride10]] ([[User talk:VietPride10|talk]]) 01:39, 18 September 2018 (UTC)