User talk:Falconfly: Difference between revisions
User has submitted an unblock appeal on UTRS (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8)) |
|||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
: Thank you. {{tlx|unblock|''Sent an email and messages on Wikimedia and Wikipedia pages explaining, hopefully you'll address this soon.''}} |
: Thank you. {{tlx|unblock|''Sent an email and messages on Wikimedia and Wikipedia pages explaining, hopefully you'll address this soon.''}} |
||
{{UTRS-unblock-user|23247|Nov 13, 2018 22:13:28}}--[[User:UTRSBot|UTRSBot]] ([[User talk:UTRSBot|talk]]) 22:13, 13 November 2018 (UTC) |
{{UTRS-unblock-user|23247|Nov 13, 2018 22:13:28}}--[[User:UTRSBot|UTRSBot]] ([[User talk:UTRSBot|talk]]) 22:13, 13 November 2018 (UTC) |
||
:: Thank you. I additionally request that the offending users are dealt with as well. |
Revision as of 22:18, 13 November 2018
Disambiguation link notification for September 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Uraeus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
September 2018
Your recent editing history at Christian terrorism shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:12, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 13:36, 17 September 2018 (UTC)Disambiguation link notification for September 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Antediluvian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sumerian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
September 2018
Your recent editing history at Synapsid shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Anaxial (talk) 06:44, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 3
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Mars (mythology) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- Proto-Indo-European mythology (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Taran
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 10
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Mars (mythology) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- Italic languages (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Lusitanian
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shuvuuia (talk • contribs) 21:11, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- Making legal threats is a bannable offense. Retract it now. --Tarage (talk) 21:22, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- See my response, @User:Tarage
- Already seeking a block for NLT. You did this to yourself. --Tarage (talk) 21:29, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- And screencapped. YOU did this to yourself <3
- Already seeking a block for NLT. You did this to yourself. --Tarage (talk) 21:29, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- See my response, @User:Tarage
Blocked
Hi. As noted in the ANI report, you have repeatedly made legal threats on Commons,[1] and have as a result been blocked indefinitely there.[2] Consequently, I assume that you know the Wikimedia foundations view of legal threats, as laid out here. Moreover, you have been warned and asked to withdraw them,[3] with no effect. You have been blocked indefinitely for making legal threats on Wikipedia, as well as for persistent personal attacks. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | talk 21:55, 13 November 2018 (UTC).
- Thank you.
{{unblock|Sent an email and messages on Wikimedia and Wikipedia pages explaining, hopefully you'll address this soon.}}
Falconfly (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #23247 was submitted on Nov 13, 2018 22:13:28.
Notes:
- If you are the blocked user, an administrator will find your request on UTRS and should email you shortly. Please do not request additional unblocks. Tickets may take 24-48 hours to process. Tickets will expire after 1 week if you have not responded via the web interface to any emails from the reviewing administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
--UTRSBot (talk) 22:13, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you. I additionally request that the offending users are dealt with as well.