User talk:Falconfly

Disambiguation link notification for September 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Uraeus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

September 2018

Your recent editing history at Christian terrorism shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:12, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  SarekOfVulcan (talk) 13:36, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Antediluvian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sumerian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

September 2018

Your recent editing history at Synapsid shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Anaxial (talk) 06:44, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 3

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Mars (mythology) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Etruscan and Maris

Proto-Indo-European mythology (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Taran

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 10

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Mars (mythology) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Etruscan and Maris

Italic languages (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Lusitanian

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shuvuuia (talk • contribs) 21:11, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Making legal threats is a bannable offense. Retract it now. --Tarage (talk) 21:22, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

See my response, @User:Tarage

Already seeking a block for NLT. You did this to yourself. --Tarage (talk) 21:29, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

And screencapped. YOU did this to yourself <3

Blocked

Hi. As noted in the ANI report, you have repeatedly made legal threats on Commons,[1] and have as a result been blocked indefinitely there.[2] Consequently, I assume that you know the Wikimedia foundations view of legal threats, as laid out here. Moreover, you have been warned and asked to withdraw them,[3] with no effect. You have been blocked indefinitely for making legal threats on Wikipedia, as well as for persistent personal attacks. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | talk 21:55, 13 November 2018 (UTC).

Thank you. {{unblock|Sent an email and messages on Wikimedia and Wikipedia pages explaining, hopefully you'll address this soon.}}

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Falconfly (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #23247 was submitted on Nov 13, 2018 22:13:28. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 22:13, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Thank you. I additionally request that the offending users are dealt with as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Falconfly (talk • contribs) 22:18, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

All of the offending users have been dealt with. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RexxS (talk • contribs) 23:25, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Under email suggestions, template uploaded with alterations:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Falconfly (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Sent an email and messages on Wikimedia and Wikipedia pages explaining, hopefully you'll address this soon.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:17, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You seem to have a mistaken belief that somehow an e-mail to anyone is going to get you unblocked. You won't be until you retract the legal threat. Period. It's that simple. --Tarage (talk) 00:21, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

• ^
• |

Example of spitefulness my detractors display. I alone am by default being slighted here, but since you insist further:

{{[[Template:reason= - Not necessary. I am simply doing my contributions, when people outright censor me entirely out of spite (see above example to see how extensive TOS breaking harassment goes unpunished). -I understand the charges and I only agree with legal threats. I have abundantly demonstrated I am willing to take issues to talk pages (i.e. recent Deinonychus talk page edits; met with personal attacks, mind you).|reason= - Not necessary. I am simply doing my contributions, when people outright censor me entirely out of spite (see above example to see how extensive TOS breaking harassment goes unpunished). -I understand the charges and I only agree with legal threats. I have abundantly demonstrated I am willing to take issues to talk pages (i.e. recent Deinonychus talk page edits; met with personal attacks, mind you).]]}}