User talk:RopeTricks: Difference between revisions
RopeTricks (talk | contribs) |
→Adding false information citing sources.: new section |
||
Line 206: | Line 206: | ||
:I disagree. Focusing on the negative impacts is an extension/form of sowing fear. Its not about what it sounds like or any implications. The term "sowing fears" is completely a product of the source's interpretation of news events. Therefore, this particular quote is subject to translation into a more neutral, less divisive choice of syntax.[[User:Thelovelyconch|Thelovelyconch]] ([[User talk:Thelovelyconch#top|talk]]) 21:18, 1 March 2019 (UTC) |
:I disagree. Focusing on the negative impacts is an extension/form of sowing fear. Its not about what it sounds like or any implications. The term "sowing fears" is completely a product of the source's interpretation of news events. Therefore, this particular quote is subject to translation into a more neutral, less divisive choice of syntax.[[User:Thelovelyconch|Thelovelyconch]] ([[User talk:Thelovelyconch#top|talk]]) 21:18, 1 March 2019 (UTC) |
||
:However, you guys seem to have a consensus already. I will leave you to it.[[User:Thelovelyconch|Thelovelyconch]] ([[User talk:Thelovelyconch#top|talk]]) 21:19, 1 March 2019 (UTC) |
:However, you guys seem to have a consensus already. I will leave you to it.[[User:Thelovelyconch|Thelovelyconch]] ([[User talk:Thelovelyconch#top|talk]]) 21:19, 1 March 2019 (UTC) |
||
== Adding false information citing sources. == |
|||
You seem to have placed [[Peshmerga]] as a belligerent saying (cross border aid) citing a source which does not mention it in anyway. Here [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Baghuz_Fawqani&diff=887806996&oldid=887802943]. Please stop this kind of false editing which is completely fake and disrupting. [[User:Jim7049|Jim7049]] ([[User talk:Jim7049|talk]]) 01:38, 15 March 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:38, 15 March 2019
|
Disambiguation link notification for January 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Turkish-backed Free Syrian Army, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Democratic Union Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to Milhist!
Hello and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.
A few features that you might find helpful:
- Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
- The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
- Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
- The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
- We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
- We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
- If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.
- If you would like to receive the project's monthly newsletter, The Bugle, please sign up here.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:00, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
April 2018 Milhist Backlog Drive
G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the Military history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:
- tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
- adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
- updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
- creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.
As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.
The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.
The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up here.
For the Milhist co-ordinators, AustralianRupert and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timeline of the Syrian Civil War (January–April 2018), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Douma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
When you make an edit
such as you did at National Statuary Hall Collection it is customary to include a reference. Fortunately it is not too late. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 05:01, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced
G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced
G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Note: the previous version omitted a link to the election page, therefore you are receiving this follow up message with a link to the election page to correct the previous version. We apologies for any inconvenience that this may have caused.
Have your say!
Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't and would like to, vote here before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Thelovelyconch. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Nominations now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards
Nominations for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards are open until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2018. Why don't you nominate the editors who you believe have made a real difference to the project in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
Voting now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards
Voting for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards is open until 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December 2018. Why don't you vote for the editors who you believe have made a real difference to Wikipedia's coverage of military history in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:17, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 29
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Artillery battery (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- Timeline of the Syrian Civil War (September–December 2018) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to French
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi! I'd like to ask you about what you are doing with Timeline of the Syrian Civil War (January–April 2019) and the draft version of it. Would you like to incubate it in draftspace or keep it in mainspace? Let me know. Snowycats (talk) 01:15, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
It was the first time I made a new article in awhile and accidentally made a draft. I subsequently made the proper page I wanted. I want draft deleted, or whatever the process is.Thelovelyconch (talk) 03:10, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Ways to improve Timeline of the Syrian Civil War (January–April 2019)
Hello, Thelovelyconch,
Thanks for creating Timeline of the Syrian Civil War (January–April 2019)! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-
Please add your references.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Boleyn (talk) 22:10, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
This article is under 1RR. You should self-revert. "Sowing fears about X" is different from "focusing on the negative impacts of X". One is about unhinged fear-mongering and lying, and the other sounds like it is an objective reciting of facts. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 21:11, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
- I disagree. Focusing on the negative impacts is an extension/form of sowing fear. Its not about what it sounds like or any implications. The term "sowing fears" is completely a product of the source's interpretation of news events. Therefore, this particular quote is subject to translation into a more neutral, less divisive choice of syntax.Thelovelyconch (talk) 21:18, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
- However, you guys seem to have a consensus already. I will leave you to it.Thelovelyconch (talk) 21:19, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
Adding false information citing sources.
You seem to have placed Peshmerga as a belligerent saying (cross border aid) citing a source which does not mention it in anyway. Here [1]. Please stop this kind of false editing which is completely fake and disrupting. Jim7049 (talk) 01:38, 15 March 2019 (UTC)