User talk:GSS

Deleterion of David Demola

Dear Vinay Gowda,

The subject is notable and featured on Christian networks. He has been accredited by Creflo Dollar and preaches to the 38th largest megachurch in the country as of 2017. Please do not mess with articles on prominent Christian leaders. May I have the original work for self-review and I will redo this article with sources for credibility? This will be redone neutrally and in an encyclopedic way.
Yours truly, John1427 (talk) 17:08 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Created Wikipedia page for actor Siddharth Mahesh

Hi Vinay Gowda created but he is not updated anything on the page, so please guide me how to verify wikipedia page and also uploading profile photo to the page

Deletion Discussion : Anil K Reji

Hey

The page Anil K Reji has been nominated for deletion. Kindly let me know what can be done to prevent the deletion.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anil_K_Reji

Valid sources and news articles have been included as references in the article. But it still has been nominated for deletion. Kindly assist me through the walkthrough process of preventing the deletion.

Thanks.

Repeated Reverting on article on "Samiksha Jaiswal".

Respected Sir/Madam,

Please tell why are you repeatedly reverting the article on Samiksha Jaiswal to #Redirect Zindagi Ki Mehek?

@Helpful14: As Barkeep49 mentioned in the edit summary that the subject not yet demonstrated to be notable per WP:NACTOR so please do not revert as it's WP:TOOSOON for this actress to have a separate article. Thank you. GSS (talk|c|em)

Edits made in Ram Awana Page

hi, Thank you for your reply. Whatever changes I made, have video references on youtube or some other sites. Can I not add such references? as Ram Awana is an actor internet is providing only video references. Please suggest what can I do. User:Gazal288 (talk) Thank you, Gazal288

Hi

Hello may I ask why my page was declined

I am submitting myself

I am submitting myself so can you help me learn why I am declined

BitcoinZ page moved to Draft

Hello @GSS, why you moved page BitcoinZ to Draft? I'm newbie on wikipedia, if i made something wrong please explain me. I'm not doing edit war, for now i'm sole editor for this page. All that edits what i've made it's my working on my own bads. All that listed edits in "Revision history" i've made in draft mode.

Tarikh Aliyev

Salam. Zəhmət olmasa "Draft:Tarikh Aliyev" məqaləsininin Tarikh Aliyev adını bərpa edə bilərsiz? Məqaləni siz silib, adını dəyişib "Draft:Tarikh Aliyev" etmisiz deyə məhz sizə müraciət etdim. Məqalənin qaralama səhifəsinin müzakirəsində sizin və digər bir istifadəçinin qeyd etdiyi bütün orfoqrafik, semantik və s. səhvlər aradan qaldırılıb, bütün problemlər həll edilib. Solavirum, zəhmət olmasa, mənim bu müraciətimi ingilis dilinə tərcümə edərsən də. Təşəkkürlər.--Samral (talk) 08:08, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

The below comment was translated using Google to read in English, please click on the "show" button. GSS ^💬 10:42, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

@Samral: Wa-Alaikum-Salaam. Bağışlayın, amma bildiyimə görə məqalə əsas məkan üçün hələ hazır deyil, çünki etibarlı mənbələrdə mövzu ilə bağlı əhəmiyyətli məlumatları görmürəm, xahiş edirəm başqasının nəzərdən keçirməsini gözləyin. Təşəkkürlər.

I'm sorry but, as per my knowledge, the draft is not yet ready for mainspace as I'm still not seeing significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources so, please wait for someone else to review. Thanks

Well, here is my translation, as Google Translate sucks at this:

Hello. Can you restore the Tarikh Aliyev namespace of "Draft:Tarikh Aliyev", please? You deleted the article, and changed its name to "Draft:Tarikh Aliyev", this is why I'm specifically applying to you. I fixed all of the orthographic, semantic, etc. issues adressed by you and others in the article's draft space's discussion page. --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 11:33, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

@GSS: yazmısız ki, "etibarlı mənbələrdə mövzu ilə bağlı əhəmiyyətli məlumatları görmürəm". Zəhmət olmasa, iddianızı daha dəqiq ifadə edə bilərsiz? Konkret hansı mənbələri etibarlı hesab etmirsiz və hansı mənbədə əhəmiyyətli məlumatları görmürsüz? Solavirum z.o. tərcümə edərsən də. --Samral (talk) 17:22, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

You wrote that "I'm still not seeing significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources". Can you express your claims more precisely, please? Exactly which sources you don't count as reliable and in which sources you can't see significant coverage? --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 17:53, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

@GSS: ???--Samral (talk) 21:00, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Sources cited for dSiamak Taghaddos

Sources have been cited for Siamak Taghaddos to show notable companies with high profile acquisitions and U.S. achievements on the deletion consideration talk page.

Please discuss if any objections or more information is needed to prevent deletion.

Thank you. 303Cadogan (talk) 15:44, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject India

WikiProject India

Namaste, GSS. We would like to inform you about the recent changes to the WikiProject. As you may know, the old newsletter for WikiProject India ceased circulation in 2010. Now we have re-launched the newsletter in a new way. As a member, you are cordially invited to subscribe to the newsletter. Thank you.

Subscribe

---

• Newsletter discussion
• Contribute
• Subscribe/Unsubscribe
• Archive

Sent by Path slopu on behalf of WikiProject India. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:55, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Need suggestion

I need suggestion as to how I can upload the picture on the Wikipedia page Littlefighterfizz (talk) 12:19, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

@Littlefighterfizz: Please see Help:Upload on how to upload a file or just visit WP:File Upload Wizard. Before you do, please ensure that you have the necessary permission from the copyright holder as otherwise the file might get tagged or deleted (see also WP:IUP). GSS ^💬 12:33, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Tagging of Draft:Thinkistan

I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Draft:Thinkistan. I do not think that Draft:Thinkistan fits any of the speedy deletion criteria  because there have been significant edits by other editors.. I request that you consider not re-tagging Draft:Thinkistan for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 21:16, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi

Hello, I didn't understood please explain.? You did something to this page Karsten Drath — Preceding unsigned comment added by Philip abc (talk • contribs) 14:35, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

@Philip abc: Are you a paid editor? if so you need to disclose per WP:PAID. GSS ^💬 14:43, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I read thanks. I organize events and talks. So, you can say I am connected or paid I am not sure. What is the right approach? How to submit the pages. it says there's a button but there's none. How should I declare? Do I need to send something? Philip abc (talk) 15:15, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

See WP:DISCLOSE and please don't forget to provide links on your Wikipedia user page to all active accounts at websites where you advertise paid Wikipedia-editing services. GSS ^💬 15:20, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Thanks...

...for the revert. I think I should start keeping a collection of sockpuppets' insults. They're so amusing... like a two-year-old's tantrum. Cabayi (talk) 12:21, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

You're welcome Cabayi, I was wondering if we can have some edit filter to protect abusing words, especially on user talk pages. Possible? GSS ^💬 11:34, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

The upcoming RfC on harassment which Arbcom announced last month may be the place for such an idea to gain some traction. Cabayi (talk) 12:31, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) Cabayi Though tempting, I must remind you to trash this thought as that page would be balatant violation of WP:DENY and would likely encourage more harassment. --DBigXrayᗙ 12:36, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Oh well, DBigXray, I'll have to find another way to validate my unhappy, low achieving existence. ☺ Cabayi (talk) 13:37, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Sharanya R Nair

Sharanya R Nair Why you decided to redirect this article ? Naveen C.M (talk) 18:58, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

User: Dhwalin - Clarification on The nature of edits

Respected Gss, I am having keen interest in to write and edit information on wikipedia. So I edit wikipedia articles, but only those articles for which I have clear and true information. Gradually I am being aware what to edit and how to edit. I am giving you surety next time you will not see any edits which make impression of undisclosed financial stake. If I clear in one line, none type of financial stake I am getting for any stack yet. But if I will, I will do the process as you mentioned in my Talk Page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhwalin (talk • contribs) 12:03, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

@Dhwalin: Do you know Vivek Agnihotri personally or professionally? GSS ^💬 12:09, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

November 2019

You wrote to me if i'm compensated for creating topics here on wikipedia. No, i'm not. Just wanted to contribute information i know which is accurate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zu.balaji (talk • contribs) 09:36, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Zu.balaji, do you have a personal or professional relationship with anyone listed here. GSS ^💬 10:19, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

GSS, I know few artist which are listed and many which are not listed but my edits are only made if there is a authentic source and try to remove a piece of information if i believe its completely fake.

@Zu.balaji: Please name those people you know personally and/or professionally and disclose your connection with them on your userpage per WP:PAID. GSS ^💬 04:30, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter November 2019

Hello GSS,

This newsletter comes a little earlier than usual because the backlog is rising again and the holidays are coming very soon.

Getting the queue to 0

There are now 804 holders of the New Page Reviewer flag! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog but it's still roughly less than 10% doing 90% of the work. Now it's time for action.
Exactly one year ago there were 'only' 3,650 unreviewed articles, now we will soon be approaching 7,000 despite the growing number of requests for the NPR user right. If each reviewer soon does only 2 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by every reviewer doing only 1 review every 2 days - that's only a few minutes work on the bus on the way to the office or to class! Let's get this over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.
Want to join? Consider adding the NPP Pledge userbox.
Our next newsletter will announce the winners of some really cool awards.

Coordinator

Admin Barkeep49 has been officially invested as NPP/NPR coordinator by a unanimous consensus of the community. This is a complex role and he will need all the help he can get from other experienced reviewers.

This month's refresher course

Paid editing is still causing headaches for even our most experienced reviewers: This official Wikipedia article will be an eye-opener to anyone who joined Wikipedia or obtained the NPR right since 2015. See The Hallmarks to know exactly what to look for and take time to examine all the sources.

Tools

• It is now possible to select new pages by date range. This was requested by reviewers who want to patrol from the middle of the list.
• It is now also possible for accredited reviewers to put any article back into the New Pages Feed for re-review. The link is under 'Tools' in the side bar.

Reviewer Feedback

Would you like feedback on your reviews? Are you an experienced reviewer who can give feedback to other reviewers? If so there are two new feedback pilot programs. New Reviewer mentorship will match newer reviewers with an experienced reviewer with a new reviewer. The other program will be an occasional peer review cohort for moderate or experienced reviewers to give feedback to each other. The first cohort will launch November 13.

Second set of eyes

• Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work, especially while some routine tagging for deletion can still be carried out by non NPR holders and inexperienced users. Read about it at the Monitoring the system section in the tutorial. If you come across such editors doing good work, don't hesitate to encourage them to apply for NPR.
• Do be sure to have our talk page on your watchlist. There are often items that require reviewers' special attention, such as to watch out for pages by known socks or disruptive editors, technical issues and new developments, and of course to provide advice for other reviewers.

Arbitration Committee

The annual ArbCom election will be coming up soon. All eligible users will be invited to vote. While not directly concerned with NPR, Arbcom cases often lead back to notability and deletion issues and/or actions by holders of advanced user rights.

Community Wish list

There is to be no wish list for WMF encyclopedias this year. We thank Community Tech for their hard work addressing our long list of requirements which somewhat overwhelmed them last year, and we look forward to a successful completion.

---

To opt-out of future mailings, you can remove yourself here

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Circular redirect

I don't think this worked the way you expected it to. Can you fix it? --R'n'B (call me Russ) 18:51, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

@R'n'B: I have speedied the redirect as non-controversial maintenance since Bošovice was hijacked and there is no article exists for this subject. Thanks for pointing it out. GSS ^💬 19:07, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

List of tamil films 2019 article changes

Asuran has collected 60 crore max as per the cited reliable source please remove the unreliable References in Asuran and its just 60 crore place it below kaithi. Thanks Giskonn (talk) 13:09, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for reverting this IP. This is a wider issue as you can probably tell by the article history and 3 users got blocked per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ankitfnp. Sometimes it feels like I'm the only one who catches it so thank you very much! HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 09:25, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Thank you HickoryOughtShirt?4, actually I added this page in my watchlist the day you nominated Vikaas Gutgutia for deletion. I notice it was created and mostly edited by SPAs so, I'm going ahead to remove some unsourced and promo type contents. GSS ^💬 03:38, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm ZI Jony. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Prakriti Nautiyal (Actress), and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Warm Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 14:04, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

I have tagged it for speedy deletion under G5 filled the SPI. GSS ^💬 14:07, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Sant Singh Maskeen's page reverted

Hi,

Just noticed that the edits that I made on Sant Singh Maskeen's page were reverted back to an old revision due to reliability issues. Edits were primarily based on the information from his biography which would fall under both the category of 'Primary sources' and 'Secondary source.' Primary since it was an "original material" that was "close to an event", is an "account written by people who" were "directly involved" in Maskeen Ji's life. The biography did "offer an insider's view of an event, a period of history...(Wikipedia:Rs). Further, this particular biography could also be considered a secondary source since its "a document or recording that relates or discusses information originally presented elsewhere." His life events have been originally recorded by other historians in the form of text, speeches and other biographies as well.

Moreover, section titled "Death" was changed to "Death and Legacy" and a newspaper article was cited to support the information. This article too meets the reliability measurement standards of Wikipedia since Wikipedia:Rs states that "News reporting from well-established news outlets is generally considered to be reliable." The article was published by The Tribune, Ludhiana which is a "well-established news outlet."

I do agree that some of the sources, such as website references, added to support some sections may not meet reliability standards but I would like to bring something to your attention that the ONLY source used to base the current revision of this page ( "ਮਸਕੀਨ ਜੀ". Article is in Punjabi. www.maskeenji.net. Retrieved 7 December 2011.) is not reliable either. As such, it does not fall under the category of secondary sources, which Wikipedia:Rs states that should be primarily used to write Wikipedia. Not to mention, this source comes from a webpage which is opinionative.

Lastly, the information provided about Maskeen Ji on the page is not accurate. A few examples include the inaccurate list of languages he knew, the reason he wasn't able to continue his education, and list of jobs he worked, etc.

So please reconsider this decision.

Thank You!--Asingh238 (talk) 22:30, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Hello Asingh238, most of your edits were not supported by reliable sources, and you also removed maintenance tags too without making any required changes. I have restored the verifiable contents in the early life section that you added earlier, but I'm still unsure about the reliability of the book source you provided so, I have tagged it with {{Unreliable source?}}. The death and legacy section that you created had a few issues, the heading wasn't correct per MOS:HEADING, the first paragraph wasn't supported with a reliable source and the second paragraph had nothing, but a quotation from the chief secretary of a non-notable organisation so, if you still want to include the quotation, please add a request on the article talk page and provide a good reason why it must be included. Also, I have removed some unsourced contents and tagged a few with {{Citation needed}} so, if you want to help, please consider providing some reliable sources to support the current state of the article. Thank you GSS ^💬 13:34, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Regarding Rockwell Scharer

Please, respond to my message on talk page.Thanks. KnightQww (talk) 17:48, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Repeatedly created article

I just noticed that this promotional article had been repeatedly created. I thought about notifying you due to your experience with these kinds of cases.

• Dedicated.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• US Dedicated (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Who is the best admin to notify if I run into a case like this? Should we file an SPI? HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 13:50, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Waking Grunt

Draft:Waking Grunt is modified with clear citations and is formatted in a neutral point of view. Kindly review or advise me how best I can improve the draft to qualify for approval. Thank you--Wrizz (talk) 17:04, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

revision 926282623 on the page "Meghdeep Bose"

I've not been and not supposed to be compensated in any form (direct or indirect) to contribute to the page of "Meghdeep Bose". Why are you asking me details of my employer/client ? I am a freelancer and I have no client to mention in relevance to these contributions. How am I supposed to prove that these are voluntary contributions and not paid ?

I am a freelancer... what is your relation with Meghdeep Bose and why are you desperately removing the maintenance tags? GSS ^💬 18:45, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

I don't have any relations with Meghdeep Bose. In fact I am a fan of his works and the flag mentioning "advertisement", "resume" and "undisclosed payments" is not valid because most of the content mentioned (also well cited) on the article has been directly quoted or interpreted from news paper publications. if you're not in favor of the nature of article then please choose to correct it, but I find the "multiple issues" flags absolutely invalid.

@GSS ???

Deletion of Delirious New York

Hi,

Recently the page for Delirious New York was removed on the basis of WP:UDP. Now, I'm sorry to say this, but this is nonsense. I've been on this site for 8 years now and started the article on the basis of its relevance to the world of architecture, publication history and influence. The article might be start-class, but is in no way a flyer or otherwise promotional, instead being supported with relevant, neutral sources and references. I have therefore reverted your deletion of the page.

Sincerely, TheNk22 (talk) 09:56, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

@TheNk22: This looks like an accidental move since it was showing in the creation of log of a blocked undisclosed paid editor. GSS ^💬 10:07, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

I see, these things can happen ¯\_(ツ)_/¯. TheNk22 (talk) 10:15, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Tagging of Shahid Shabbir

I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Shahid Shabbir. I do not think that Shahid Shabbir fits any of the speedy deletion criteria  because "He is widely known for his work on discovering and restoring Sikh and Hindu religious places left in Pakistan after 1947" is a Claim of significence. I request that you consider not re-tagging Shahid Shabbir for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 04:23, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

@DESiegel: I'm not seeing anything beyond passing mentions and a Google search for "Shahid Shabbir" revealed nothing better so, I have proposed the article for deletion. GSS ^💬 04:30, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Preply

ਹੈਲੋ, GSS!

Thanks for your attention to Preply. I'd like to ask if you consider moving the UDP template either to the talk page or to the user's page of a person who violated the rule? The reason is that the article definitely could be created in return for undisclosed payments BUT it was fully re-written since then and I don't see how it currently could violate this Wiki rule. Thanks.

Here's your edit which moving it back: [1]

Goo3 (talk) 11:34, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

AIV

I have reported this user to AIV. Robvanvee 09:17, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

...and blocked. Never mind. Robvanvee 09:18, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

That was weird

Sorry about that, I think that must have been Twinkle acting up. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:17, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Replies to Anupam

@Anupam: Since you keep removing my messages from your talk page and since none of my messages reveals your real-life identity I'm going to add my replies here. All my previous replies can be seen here.

• What you mean by falsehood? all my comments are based on evidence that I'm happy to share with any admin who wants to review your block. That advert was posted in October 2018, and the review was added by you in January 2019 four years after you created Outlook Mobile so your claim doesn't make any sense. In October 2019, you hired a freelancer from Upwork to add comments on a talk page for you as well as to perform a few reverts what was your purpose? GSS ^💬 18:41, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

• @Barkeep49:, He wants to continue paid editing without disclosing links to his off-wiki websites where he advertises? and his clients? that's a violation of WP:PAID. Why it took him years to understand our policies? do we really give this much chances to brand new paid editors? the list is not completed and his claim that he also provides consultation services is just an excuse, we can't review all becasue most of the adverts are protected, but from the title of those adverts, we can judge they aren't for consultation services. Out of all 50 paid jobs he took from Upwork he disclosed only 32 or something and we don't know about the rest of them. In June 2018 he was hired for something that reads: "Wikipedia New Page Reviewer/Administrator Needed" what that was for? as per WP:PAID he can't perform as a reviewer. His Upwork still give the impression that he provide Wikipedia services no matter directly or indirectly. He was abusing this platform by claiming that he works for the Wikimedia Foundation and also claimed I have propper administrative user rights in order to successfully upload articles on his Upwork profile. In October 2018, He was hired to add a new logo, media mentions, product launches etc., but it was never disclosed which is again a violation of WP:PAID. Last month he hired a freelancer from Upwork to comment on a talk page and perform a few reverts (that's what the advert reads) so, that means he literally hired someone to game the system and we have no idea how many times he did things like this in the past. Before he was blocked by Yunshui on 12th, he was working on 10 Wikipedia related projects which he needs to disclose that too. How we're going to trust this user who is constantly violating our policies? and keep lying. GSS ^💬 02:35, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Oh forget to add. He claimed on his talk page that many of my projects are simply consultations and do not result in an article on Wikipe:dia because they do not meet WP:N, WP:RS and WP:V then why he created Frederick P. Lenz Foundation for American Buddhism a clearly non-notable organisation and why it was disclosed after Yunshui asked him about it? why not the same day he posted that article? GSS ^💬 03:20, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

GSS he says he will no longer advertise services. If true there isn't anything, per the policy, he would need to link to. If he were advertising services he'd need to link. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 03:25, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Are we trusting someone who was gaming our system for years and not even disclosed all their paid edits? GSS ^💬 03:32, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Rubina Bajwa

Hi. I'm OTRS agent. We've received an statement for file in this article, but now I see that you've move it from main space to user sandbox and now it's back. Is there still doubts about notability? If so, I can't proceed yet with the permission. Please let me know. Thanks. --Ganímedes (talk) 13:09, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Ticket:2019120110002705. --Ganímedes (talk) 13:15, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

@Ganímedes: I don’t think notability is an issue here. The article has been moved back to mainspace by someone with a possible conflict of interest so, their move could be challenged per WP:DRAFTIFY. GSS ^💬 13:36, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Why this page nominated for delectation ?

Why this page nominated for delectation ? You can google his name for authentication. You don't have any right to delete this without google it. please add this page on wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satyahari_Mondal — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.77.138.137 (talk) 12:58, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Time for laughs.

Hi Gss, Check out this funny video. My Punjabi needs some help. Can you help me decipher the translation. Question marked brackets means I am not sure If I heard some of it right. You can copy edit the lines directly. --DBigXrayᗙ 09:35, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

English transcript

00:40 Deer: Oh did you get tired you (dog ?) 00:45 Deer: Remember I will hear (you tomorrow ?) 00:55 Mammoth: Oye 01:01 Smilodon: Whos that 01:03 M:Lakhs of shame on you .... (  ?) 01:05 S: What did i do to you  ? 01:07 M: You told me that you are the lion of the forest, or some tired shayar's poetry  ? You could not even take out a beetroot. could not even run and catch a dog ? ( ......... ?) 01:17 S: I am not wearing boots, My feet hurt due to (prickly stones ?)( ...........?) 01:20 M (............?) 01:27 S: Actually, I am no longer young or else ( ...........?) 01:30 M (....... ?) 01:35 S: I once killed a crocodile. (....... ?) 01:35 M Oh come one, calling you a king of the jungle makes me (feel ashamed ?) (....... ?) 01:35 S: (....... ?)

@DBigXray: Sorry I wasn't able to get back to you sooner. The Punjabi in this video is slightly different from my area (Doaba), but I tried my best to translate it so, here you go. GSS ^💬 05:12, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

English transcript

00:40 Deer: Oh did you get tired you dog? 00:45 Deer: Remember this (rhythm) I will hear from you tomorrow? 00:58 Mammoth: Oye 00:59 Smilodon: Who's that 01:00 M: Lakhs of shame on you, curse on your face. 01:03 S: What did I do to you? 01:04 M: Can you tell me if you are the lion of the forest or some tired poet's poetry? You could not even take out a beetroot. You are dressing like a tiger, but can't even run like a dog, go away you broke my heart. 01:13 S: I wasn't wearing boots and my feet was hurting due to prickly stones. She (Deer) was wearing joggers and manage to run away. 01:19 M: Oh really? As if the day you wear shoes, you just jump and bring the sun out of the sky. 01:24 S: Actually, I am no longer young otherwise I used to catch such deers only by walking. 01:29 M: Bullshit. 01:31 S: I once caught a crocodile. Neither he nor I was moving and then I realized that I did not, he has caught me. 01:37 M: You were once slapped by a monkey repeatedly. 01:39 S: He was just a little monkey, how many times would he have hit me? 01:42 M: Oh come on, calling you a king of the jungle makes me feel ashamed. 01:47 S: Then don't elect me this time and vote for the bear.

Thanks a lot for the efforts GSS. I really appreciate it. Yes, the dubbing is in Lahori (Pakistani) Punjabi. your translation was really helpful in understanding the video fully. One can appreciate the joke only by knowing the language. Did you understand the connotations of the last line about the bear ? (I know, but want to check.) Also I think I did a decent translation. How do you rate my understanding of Punjabi out of 10 ? --DBigXrayᗙ 22:23, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Being a non-Punjabi speaker, you did a great job. I'm not sure if I understood the connotations of the last line, did you? By the way, thanks for sharing this video. GSS ^💬 05:13, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Wow, I am overjoyed to get a 7 rating being a non Punjabi speaker. glad to know that you enjoyed it as well. The last line, has political meanings. Nawaz Sharif's Pakistan Muslim League (N) party's election symbol is Lion. During an election, a lion was "chained, placed on a vehicle and repeatedly paraded around as part of the election campaign" [2]. Sharif is often called lion by supporters, hence the reference. There is no bear that I am aware though, but it is obviously a bit of insulting reference to the opposition. DBigXrayᗙ 10:42, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Notability

If I am not wrong, the biographies of Juhi Rustagi, Shivani Menon, Rishi S. Kumar, and Al Sabith does not conform with WP:NACTOR, WP:1E, or WP:TOOSOON. Probably created by fans of the show Uppum Mulakum. Can you consider nominating for deletion. 2409:4073:2089:B1C7:CD21:695F:2E9E:BBE8 (talk) 12:07, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter December 2019

Reviewer of the Year

This year's Reviewer of the Year is Rosguill. Having gotten the reviewer PERM in August 2018, they have been a regular reviewer of articles and redirects, been an active participant in the NPP community, and has been the driving force for the emerging NPP Source Guide that will help reviewers better evaluate sourcing and notability in many countries for which it has historically been difficult.

Special commendation again goes to Onel5969 who ends the year as one of our most prolific reviewers for the second consecutive year. Thanks also to Boleyn and JTtheOG who have been in the top 5 for the last two years as well.

Several newer editors have done a lot of work with CAPTAIN MEDUSA and DannyS712 (who has also written bots which have patrolled thousands of redirects) being new reviewers since this time last year.

Thanks to them and to everyone reading this who has participated in New Page Patrol this year.

Top 10 Reviewers over the last 365 days

Rank	Username	Num reviews	Log
1	Rosguill (talk)	47,395	Patrol Page Curation
2	Onel5969 (talk)	41,883	Patrol Page Curation
3	JTtheOG (talk)	11,493	Patrol Page Curation
4	Arthistorian1977 (talk)	5,562	Patrol Page Curation
5	DannyS712 (talk)	4,866	Patrol Page Curation
6	CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk)	3,995	Patrol Page Curation
7	DragonflySixtyseven (talk)	3,812	Patrol Page Curation
8	Boleyn (talk)	3,655	Patrol Page Curation
9	Ymblanter (talk)	3,553	Patrol Page Curation
10	Cwmhiraeth (talk)	3,522	Patrol Page Curation

(The top 100 reviewers of the year can be found here)

Redirect autopatrol

A recent Request for Comment on creating a new redirect autopatrol pseduo-permission was closed early. New Page Reviewers are now able to nominate editors who have an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects. At the individual discretion of any administrator or after 24 hours and a consensus of at least 3 New Page Reviewers an editor may be added to a list of users whose redirects will be patrolled automatically by DannyS712 bot III.

Source Guide Discussion

Set to launch early in the new year is our first New Page Patrol Source Guide discussion. These discussions are designed to solicit input on sources in places and topic areas that might otherwise be harder for reviewers to evaluate. The hope is that this will allow us to improve the accuracy of our patrols for articles using these sources (and/or give us places to perform a WP:BEFORE prior to nominating for deletion). Please watch the New Page Patrol talk page for more information.

This month's refresher course

While New Page Reviewers are an experienced set of editors, we all benefit from an occasional review. This month consider refreshing yourself on Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features). Also consider how we can take the time for quality in this area. For instance, sources to verify human settlements, which are presumed notable, can often be found in seconds. This lets us avoid the (ugly) 'Needs more refs' tag.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:10, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!!

Thank you very much GSS for your thoughtful greeting. You have my very best wishes for this holiday season. May your heart be filled with happiness during this special time.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:40, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

	Merry Christmas GSS
	Hi GSS, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very happy and prosperous New Year, Thanks for all your contributions to the 'pedia this past year,    –Davey2010talk 00:45, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Please help review Lee liu's wiki entry

Hi According to your suggestion, I have made the latest amendments to the entry of lee liu, please assist in reviewing — Preceding unsigned comment added by 吴刚亚 (talk • contribs) 03:49, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

GSS,
Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:54, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

---

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

– Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.

Think

Archana Kochhar is notable? ∯WBG^converse 07:39, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Will look at it soon. GSS ^💬 05:13, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Appear to be a non-notable run-of-the-mill fashion designer with lots of sources but no real claim to notability. I have nominated the image for deletion since it was uploaded by an undisclosed paid editor with no OTRS email from the original copyright holder.​ GSS ^💬 06:17, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of page Gabor Megyeri

Hello GSS, Thanks for the message. I do not have a financial stake in the edits I have made; I have mostly been working on topics I am interested in/know a little about, either by editing the information or adding pages that exist on other versions of Wikipedia to the English Wikipedia site. I'm sorry if the article I translated does not meet Wikipedia guidelines -- perhaps I could edit it again to make it fit the guidelines better? Thanks for your guidance, I appreciate it. Umaijetau (talk) 06:19, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Paid sock!

Well, it seems reviewer rights have been granted to a UPE[3]! --Madhaberisl (talk) 16:10, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

@M.A.K. Writers: Please disclose how and where you were hired to edit Gurbaksh Chahal. GSS ^💬 14:00, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

I never stated that I was hired I just state that I might get paid, I already stated that it's not a deal. I will ask the owner If he may pay me for this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by M.A.K. Writers (talk • contribs) 14:18, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

@M.A.K. Writers: I said how you were hired? not paid. How you were contacted by Dhawal Damania? do you advertise paid Wikipedia services anywhere? GSS ^💬 14:43, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

I don't provide any type of wikipedia service, I was hired by Dhawal to write about successful indian businessmen, so as I was searching for them, I learn about Gurbaksh Chahal and decided to add him, so I came to wikipedia to find more about him, obivously I was only interested in his business related information but what I found was some information regarding his case. If anyone want to write about his crime, then he/she make a seprate page for that. Same thing is stated again and again. I really heavily on wikipedia to get information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by M.A.K. Writers (talk • contribs) 15:11, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

I don't provide any type of wikipedia service, I was hired by Dhawal to write about successful indian businessmen, so as I was searching for them, I learn about Gurbaksh Chahal and decided to add him, so I came to wikipedia to find more about him, obivously I was only interested in his business related information but what I found was some information regarding his case. If anyone want to write about his crime, then he/she make a seprate page for that. Same thing is stated again and again. I really heavily on wikipedia to get information. I want these type of information should on another page like this; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Commission_into_Misconduct_in_the_Banking,_Superannuation_and_Financial_Services_Industry It also one of the page of wikipedia with relates to a specific bank but the writer make new page so information can be convey more effectively — Preceding unsigned comment added by M.A.K. Writers (talk • contribs) 15:59, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Digital Footprint Optimization

What is it about Draft:Digital Footprint Optimization that makes you think it was created for pay? I'm not seeing it. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 19:34, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

@ONUnicorn: There is an advert on Upwork.com, please let me know if you want the link. GSS ^💬 02:26, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Yes please. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 14:09, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. Wow, that's just copy-pasted from the listing. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 15:45, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Paid articles

Hello, could you help me? I can't fully understand if I can create and edit articles for people who ask me and offer some money or it is prohibited in Wikipedia? Thank you! Գարիկ Ավագյան (talk)

EverlyWell

I do not yet know if this was a violation of guidelines and policies, but pinging participants from an AfD which concluded one year ago feels inappropriate. I have never seen this done. I do not believe it allows the AfD to proceed to a natural conclusion and develop a new WP:LOCALCONSENSUS. There is new information about this companies successes from 2019 which may have changed the AfD result. Anyway, I stopped by to tell you that pinging the participants seems out of process. Lightburst (talk) 19:26, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia page : Global Child Prodigy Awards

Hello sir

I am Prashant Cofounder of GCP Awards, recently my page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Child_Prodigy_Awards has been nominated for deletion and everyone in the comment is saying we are trying to do promotions. Respected sir, we are not at all trying to promote in any manner. This is the concept which we have been working from over 3 years without any commercial benefits. The initiative has received support from the following people

• Kailash Satyarthi Ji (Nobel Peace Laureate ) • Mr. Rodrigo Duterte (President of the Philippines) • A R Rahman Ji • Shri V S Radhakrishnan (State Minister of Education, Sri Lanka) • General Bipin Rawat (Chief of The Army Staff) • Admiral Sunil Lanba (Chief of the Naval Staff) • Shri Amitabh Kant Ji (CEO, NITI Aayog) • Shri Yogi Adityanath Ji (Honourable Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh) • Air Chief Marshal BS Dhanoa (Chief of the Air Staff) • Capt. Amarinder Singh (Honourable Chief Minister of Punjab) • Shri. Vijay Rupani Ji (Honourable Chief Minister of Gujarat) • Shri Pinarayi Vijayan Ji (Honourable Chief Minister of Kerala) • Shri Sarbananda Sonowal Ji (Honourable Chief Minister of Assam) • Shri Lal Thanhawla (Honourable Chief Minister of Mizoram) • Justice (Retd.) P. Sathasivam Ji (Governor, Kerala) • Prof. Kaptan Singh Solanki (Governor of Haryana) • Dr. Kaarthikeyan (Former Director CBI) • Admiral D. K Joshi (Lieutenant Governor of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands) and many others

Sir, recently we have done our first launch which has been covered organically by 428+ media organizations from different countries.

Sir even after all that the reviewers have made changes and it can be clearly seen that they are not at all trying to understand the concept sir. How to make them believe if not the newspapers, I wonder. Sir, I am new to this Wikipedia, I learned from the internet and created by our team with all the policies in mind. I may have done some mistakes but its a request to teach me my mistakes instead of deleting the page sir. Please understand the context and response. I can share more details via email if required. Please help Thanks Prashant — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.51.25.48 (talk) 13:51, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Plum Guide

Hi GSS. You are incorrect in your assumption. Please educate yourself by reading the edit thread and comments between me and GoodCrossing. --> "Hey, I've noticed you're editing the text to make it more neutral. To be honest, I'm also quite new so I'm not sure if it should be further updated but thanks for contributing! GoodCrossing (talk) 21:29, 8 January 2020 (UTC)" --MG2020DTC (talk) 16:25, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

In addition, I have reverted the article to the previous version that meets Wikipedias Guidelines and was edited with the help of GoodCrossing before you intervened. Please take note that this version provides valuable, non biased information based on the following :

provide accurate references for information that's already in the article (and we have a strong preference that the reference/citation be a reliable source) add or update facts, such as a person's date or place of birth, a company's location or number of employees, or details of a recent event - and if you do, please add a reference/citation; otherwise, other editors have no way of knowing if the change is true or not[1]MG2020DTC (talk) 16:32, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

There is very clear evidence to support my claim and your edit has been reverted back so, please do not revert back and see WP:DISCLOSEPAY and WP:3RR. GSS 💬 17:10, 5 February 2020 (UTC) I am sorry you feel that way and that you feel entitled to bully me. Please see WP:3RR yourself and adhere to that rule, as you were the first person to revert changes, you will be in breach of this before I am. Thanks. MG2020DTC (talk) 17:27, 5 February 2020 (UTC) Stop icon Your recent editing history at The Plum Guide shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. GSS 💬 17:31, 5 February 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by MG2020DTC (talk • contribs)

/* User:GSS reported by User:MG2020DTC */

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:MG2020DTC reported by User:InvalidOS (Result: ). Thank you. Invalid^OS (talk) 17:36, 5 February 2020 (UTC)