User talk:Kubura: Difference between revisions
Undid revision 947016716 by Mateo K 01 (talk) OBECAVAM TI ZESTOK RAT, IMA DA PAMTIS MOJE IME U POSLEDNJOJ SEKUNDI SVOGA PROKLETO WIKIPEDOFILA ZIVOTA I OVDE TI I MATEO CETE USKORO DOBITI SVOJ STRANU SA SVIM TAJNIM VASIM INFORMACIJAMA GDE CE ZAUVEK OSTATI! https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/wikimediacomputer |
Mateo K 01 (talk | contribs) Undid revision 949683412 by 73.110.42.201 (talk) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
[[User talk:Kubura/Archive13|Archive 13]] |
[[User talk:Kubura/Archive13|Archive 13]] |
||
== Nomination of [[:Republic of Peščenica]] for deletion == |
== Nomination of [[:Republic of Peščenica]] for deletion == |
||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article '''[[:Republic of Peščenica]]''' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]]. |
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article '''[[:Republic of Peščenica]]''' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]]. |
||
The article will be discussed at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Republic of Peščenica]] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. |
The article will be discussed at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Republic of Peščenica]] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. |
||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> [[User:A loose noose|A loose noose]] ([[User talk:A loose noose|talk]]) 07:24, 11 April 2018 (UTC) |
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> [[User:A loose noose|A loose noose]] ([[User talk:A loose noose|talk]]) 07:24, 11 April 2018 (UTC) |
||
== ArbCom 2018 election voter message == |
== ArbCom 2018 election voter message == |
Revision as of 22:26, 7 April 2020
Archive 1 - Edits on "SC language"
Archive 2 - Srijem issues
Archive 3 - W.Herzog, Stjepan and Montenegro issues
Archive 4 - Cro-Ser questions, very interesting discussion, many topic being opened/touched/resolved
Archive 5 - Some Doclea and Dalmatia issues
Archive 6 - Farsi, Diego, NHL, Stjepan
Archive 7 - Republic of Dubrovnik, Haydn, various
Archive 8 - Mostly vandalism dealing, Zadar, Mikalja
Archive 9 - Saborsko, RfARB, prop, ...
Archive 10 - Italianization, Pagania, diacritics...
Archive 11 - Epics of Evlekis, some trolls, puppet theater, campaign of LAZ...
Archive 12
Archive 13
Nomination of Republic of Peščenica for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Republic of Peščenica is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Republic of Peščenica until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. A loose noose (talk) 07:24, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Kubura. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)