User talk:Vaurnheart: Difference between revisions
→Council of the European Union: new section |
→Council of the European Union: good luck with that. |
||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
You may be interested to contribute to the discussion at [[Talk:Council of the European Union#Upper House?]]. --[[User:Red King|Red King]] ([[User talk:Red King|talk]]) 17:14, 30 January 2020 (UTC) |
You may be interested to contribute to the discussion at [[Talk:Council of the European Union#Upper House?]]. --[[User:Red King|Red King]] ([[User talk:Red King|talk]]) 17:14, 30 January 2020 (UTC) |
||
:I agree with your edits today but won't be surprised if they are reverted, per the discussion I recommended in January. [[Law of the instrument|The cookie cutters]] had their way. --[[User:Red King|Red King]] ([[User talk:Red King|talk]]) 14:37, 29 April 2020 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 14:37, 29 April 2020
August 2015
Hello, I'm Plantsurfer. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Oxalis acetosella, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Plantsurfer 15:19, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Vaurnheart, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Quick introduction to Wikipedia
- How to write a great article
- Ten Simple Rules for Editing Wikipedia, an essay from PLOS Computational Biology
- Identifying reliable sources for medicine-related articles (general advice)
- Wikipedia's Manual of Style for medicine-related articles (general style guide)
- A few tricks to help you format references are at WP:MEDHOW
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, try Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or .
If you are interested in medicine-related themes, you may want to visit the Medicine Portal.
If you are interested in improving medicine-related articles, you may want to join WikiProject Medicine (sign up here or say hello here).
Again, welcome! Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:41, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
January 2016
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Wild man may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
|---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:50, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Reference errors on 3 March
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Human rights in Oman page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help) and a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Stirrup into Heavy cavalry. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 23:25, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
October 2018
Hello, I'm Curb Safe Charmer. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Écréhous, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Other wikis are not considered to be a reliable source. See WP:USERG. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 21:29, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Council of the European Union
You may be interested to contribute to the discussion at Talk:Council of the European Union#Upper House?. --Red King (talk) 17:14, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
- I agree with your edits today but won't be surprised if they are reverted, per the discussion I recommended in January. The cookie cutters had their way. --Red King (talk) 14:37, 29 April 2020 (UTC)