Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Nhl4hamilton/Sportspage: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→User:Nhl4hamilton/Sportspage: Closed as delete (XFDcloser) |
Nhl4hamilton (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion|{{collapse bottom}}|}} |
{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion|{{collapse bottom}}|}} |
||
FUCK BALLS |
|||
Revision as of 15:49, 31 July 2020
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete. As a libra, I have weighed the scales of this debate and I find that they are tilted toward delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:56, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Seems like a violation of U5 (NOTWEBHOST), and I'd speedy this, except that the editor has done legitimate Wikipedia article writing in the past. But this, a list of Canadian baseball players divided up in teams by their astrological sign (I think), that's not OK. User hasn't edited in article space since 2014, BTW, but they made over 500 edits to this page since then. Drmies (talk) 16:16, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - Looks like a case where not speedying was right because it isn't obvious, but it still looks like it should be deleted. Still web hosting if not so obvious as to be U5. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:02, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per the nom. Wikipedia is not a free webhost, and this will never make it to main space. Newshunter12 (talk) 17:29, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- Blank with warning, to not use Wikipedia for WEBHOSTing. Don't delete, not yet, because: (1) it represents a small fraction of his >20K mainspace edits; and (2) his recent inactivity means her can't be expected to give an explanation in seven days; and (3) Page Page views, 13 in 90 days is evidence against egregious NOTWEBHOST violation. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:09, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
FUCK BALLS