User:RTG: Difference between revisions
its out of my hands |
No edit summary |
||
Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
---- |
---- |
||
So I suppose it looks like I will be banned forever seeing as an edit like this ->[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=881925199] is an attack on the whole Wikipedia community. But in reality, for pointing out that inaccurate, reactionary biased sources are lies (it's a personal attack, of course, depending who liked the sound of said sources). And for a whole list of similar non-issues. Wikipedia has changed. If you want to edit the opinion areas of the site, you'd better being by ignoring WP:BATTLEGROUND, and considering every editor you meet to be a deadly adversary. All an editor has to do when they are jaded is post up a list of other editors ''claiming'' you are attacking, without any sort of diff supporting the claim, and you'll be dumped out forever. Anyone who is keen to point out ideas or overlooked issues, because they love the site, watch out for a wall of unspoken hate that ''hates'' people who do that. I'm apparently mostly incoherent, attacking, harmful to accurate content, and engaged in psychological warfare (gaslighting, particularly for this userpage). I am only here to battle with others and have no respect for the site. All being upheld by over 90% after a week. Oh, and of course, responding at length, even to a massive report of you, is also some evil nastiness. Even the monkey floating on my talkpage for all these years is some kind of sinister thing the site has been damaged to cope with. Saionara o/ |
So I suppose it looks like I will be banned forever seeing as an edit like this ->[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=881925199] is an attack on the whole Wikipedia community. But in reality, for pointing out that inaccurate, reactionary biased sources are lies (it's a personal attack, of course, depending who liked the sound of said sources). And for a whole list of similar non-issues. Wikipedia has changed. If you want to edit the opinion areas of the site, you'd better being by ignoring WP:BATTLEGROUND, and considering every editor you meet to be a deadly adversary. All an editor has to do when they are jaded is post up a list of other editors ''claiming'' you are attacking, without any sort of diff supporting the claim, and you'll be dumped out forever. Anyone who is keen to point out ideas or overlooked issues, because they love the site, watch out for a wall of unspoken hate that ''hates'' people who do that. I'm apparently mostly incoherent, attacking, harmful to accurate content, and engaged in psychological warfare (gaslighting, particularly for this userpage). I am only here to battle with others and have no respect for the site. All being upheld by over 90% after a week. Oh, and of course, responding at length, even to a massive report of you, is also some evil nastiness. Even the monkey floating on my talkpage for all these years is some kind of sinister thing the site has been damaged to cope with. Saionara o/ |
||
---- |
|||
* [[Wikipedia:Snowball_clause#What_the_snowball_clause_is_not]] |
|||
* "These templates should only be used in accordance with the Wikipedia:Refactoring guideline; they should never be used to end a discussion over the objections of other editors, except in cases of unambiguous disruptive editing." ~ [[:Template:Collapse top]] |
|||
---- |
---- |
||
{{clear}} |
{{clear}} |
Revision as of 20:59, 8 August 2020
- At an individual point in space and time, all becomes one with everything. The point is the difference.
- Do not produce a universe within if motivated to improve and add to the one already there. You will long for this universe forever once it is done with you.
- Know fear and never let it be your guide. But never part with it if you want to survive.
- Try to follow the guides. Try to write the guides. Understand the guides better than your self.
- Awesome sauce is: Awesome's awesome's awesome's awesome. The awesome sauce has been lost! Find it. Find a way.
- There is no past or future. The ever changing is continually presented to you.
Death becomes you. Your conscience is leaving. Your mind escapes. Gravity is the opposite of life. Gravity grinds and binds the material together with waves, into singularity. Life breaks it all apart with vibrations. Gravity is the blob. Life is the definition. Citation needed.
- Keep your enemies, closer,
The way I see it, a star is an eternal flame. Motionless, it burns endlessly, against an empty, eternal night. Other heavenly bodies tug a war with each other, for the honour of dancing before it, for almost, forever... The way a star sees it, there's nothing as cold as it pops into existence. Squashed and roomless, it tries to turn away, to find space. That action squeezes the life out of it, and it crackles and dies... Being a star is not easy.
Someone wrote somewhere, "If a rule prevents you from improving or maintaining Wikipedia, ignore it." For me this usually means the rule that only administrators can edit fully protected pages. I've tried ignoring that, but nothing seems to happen!
According to Wikipedia on this date, the average measure of spittle produced by a healthy adult is one litre or more per day, only counting the gland beneath the tongue, and 1.5 litres counting all the saliva glands.. Salivating is one of the most important elements of human health. Salivation is the catalyst for digestion. Digestion is the source of all bodily function. Gnash your food into mush, as much as you have the patience for, to make it easier to absorb... and make sure you are producing a lot of saliva, to digest, and ensure the juice in your body is flowing. Like respiration and digestion, and most things to do with your throat and body, when the saliva is flowing neatly, it feels like part of your heart, or depending how your world looks at it, part of your liver...
Are you from a generation, that time forgot? I'm from a generation, that time rejected. The most significantly insignificant of the whole lot together, when it shouldn't have been... just like yours...
One of the old ways of looking at the concept of gods that we don't hear about much these days is virtual reality. The thing about a god was how and why it controlled you, and not only was that the thing about the gods, it was the thing about everything else as well. But this led to the idea that when gods wanted to party, or wanted to feel important, the boss among men would become the gods vessel. All humans are just another kind of creature. They are all individuals. Tell them for hundreds of years, that gods not only walk among them, but that they embody the gods for power and pleasure, and they'll end up doing strangely inventive things. They'll do the things which are stranger, as much as possible, so that they can seem unique, trying to take the gods perspective. From a human perspective... we weren't very good at that...
I am biased. Against minimalist art, applied too maximally... And modern art... when it is designed to be more expressive than artistic...
Hide and change all links to the lessons of the past... if you want your children to forget and repeat them... or something like that,
Complaints should not offend us simply because they are complaints.
The basis of the French Revolution was that the elites were not the elites, but they were the idiots... The results are inconclusive...
We generally evaluate the quality of Wikipedia on the breadth and accuracy of content. But that is not the true value of Wikipedia. We do not originate or create the information. We simply put it through a system, and it is the system which is the core of value for all of Wikipedia. Without that system, another site would do it better. The content has a value beyond that system, but it does not belong to Wikipedia as we publish it without copyright. This has always been the way.
So I suppose it looks like I will be banned forever seeing as an edit like this ->[1] is an attack on the whole Wikipedia community. But in reality, for pointing out that inaccurate, reactionary biased sources are lies (it's a personal attack, of course, depending who liked the sound of said sources). And for a whole list of similar non-issues. Wikipedia has changed. If you want to edit the opinion areas of the site, you'd better being by ignoring WP:BATTLEGROUND, and considering every editor you meet to be a deadly adversary. All an editor has to do when they are jaded is post up a list of other editors claiming you are attacking, without any sort of diff supporting the claim, and you'll be dumped out forever. Anyone who is keen to point out ideas or overlooked issues, because they love the site, watch out for a wall of unspoken hate that hates people who do that. I'm apparently mostly incoherent, attacking, harmful to accurate content, and engaged in psychological warfare (gaslighting, particularly for this userpage). I am only here to battle with others and have no respect for the site. All being upheld by over 90% after a week. Oh, and of course, responding at length, even to a massive report of you, is also some evil nastiness. Even the monkey floating on my talkpage for all these years is some kind of sinister thing the site has been damaged to cope with. Saionara o/
- Wikipedia:Snowball_clause#What_the_snowball_clause_is_not
- "These templates should only be used in accordance with the Wikipedia:Refactoring guideline; they should never be used to end a discussion over the objections of other editors, except in cases of unambiguous disruptive editing." ~ Template:Collapse top