User talk:Delta fiver

Welcome!

I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! RFD (talk) 16:10, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Yash

Hai I yam Yash Waterywer555 (talk) 15:30, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

TonyBallioni (talk) 22:43, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Danny Dietz has been accepted

Danny Dietz, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:41, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: CouRageJD has been accepted

CouRageJD, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Interstellarity (talk) 18:15, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fedmyster has been accepted

Fedmyster, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nightenbelle (talk) 20:02, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Deleted comment

Hello, I see you've reverted my edit with "Learn how to add to the Wikipedia by using those references, meaningful edits are worth the time and effort." as a reason. Could you be more specific? Are you saying that those references were reliable but they should be added to the page and not be discussed on the talk page at all? Or do you mean something else that was not clear to me? Could you redirect me to what I did wrong? Were the sources not reliable? Was the reply not relevant to the question asked? Was the comment deleted only because I expressed my doubt about how to add to Wikipedia or because there was something wrong with the references themselves? Appreciated. ThatStoopidGuy (talk) 20:37, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi there, I'd like to begin by telling you that editing on the Wikipedia is a leap of faith usually, as everything is foreign and is waiting to be discovered by you. With the cliche stuff aside, the Wikipedia introduced the sandbox which you'll see on the top right next to the talk option, you can use the sandbox to learn how the Wikipedia functions and as to how you can reference and edit effectively, also how to avoid errors, I think it's a great place to learn how to edit especially if you're starting out. As for reverting your edits, I did that as things which discuss the subject are only permitted on the subject page (the page you edited) and no personal thoughts or language is allowed there, rather your thoughts and additions can be discussed on the talk page as much as you like in cases where you are in doubt. The sources you mentioned seem fine, well at least from my perspective, Dexerto reports on alot of E-sports and media, which is applicable there but then again it's in my perspective. I feel you didn't do anything wrong, but for the sake of keeping the Wikipedia neutral and ready at all times for people to come and read, it is important for information to be adequate and well reported on. I would suggest reading a couple of paragraphs on the page you edited, understanding the neutral language maintained there and then make those edits once again, I'll take a look at them once you've added them and then see what needs more polishing and what's fine, sounds good??

Thank you very much. I see the problem now. I should've just reported what the articles said with no other additions on my end. I may try to add that information again later. ThatStoopidGuy (talk) 23:43, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

I highly suggest you do, we all start somewhere. Delta fiver (talk) (UTC) 05:03, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Draft:AloPeyk

thanks for explaining the issues in detail. I tried to fix them. Can I ask you to take a look at it?Hispring (talk) 16:59, 26 October 2020 (UTC)