User contributions for Soham321

This account is currently blocked. (Show block details) The latest block log entry is provided below for reference:

20:48, 31 December 2016 Bishonen talk contribs changed block settings for Soham321 talk contribs with an expiration time of indefinite (account creation blocked, cannot edit own talk page) (revoking talkpage access)

View full log

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

13:0313:03, 8 April 2013 diff hist −32 Markandey Katju Jaitley has referred to Katju's criticism of Gujarat, West Bengal, and Bihar. See second paragraph of his article criticizing Katju.
12:5512:55, 8 April 2013 diff hist +2,808 Markandey Katju Undid revision 549317219 by MohitSingh (talk) the precise reasons for the Jaitley-Katju dispute together with the reactions on the dispute are of public interest.
06:0006:00, 8 April 2013 diff hist +3,023 Talk:Markandey Katju Reply to User:Neelkamala
04:3904:39, 8 April 2013 diff hist −42 m Markandey Katju Corrected a syntax error
04:1504:15, 8 April 2013 diff hist +6 m Markandey Katju Corrected a minor syntax error
04:0404:04, 8 April 2013 diff hist 0 Markandey Katju Changed 'controversial' to 'in a lighter vein' which is the phrase used to describe Katju's remark in the reference article
02:2102:21, 8 April 2013 diff hist +2 m Markandey Katju corrected some grammar
02:1302:13, 8 April 2013 diff hist +925 Markandey Katju Added further details and another reference to the Katju-Jaitly dispute in Politics section
01:5801:58, 8 April 2013 diff hist +3,687 Markandey Katju Cleaned up the Politics section by providing further information about the Jaitley-Katju dispute
01:0001:00, 8 April 2013 diff hist −447 Markandey Katju removed Katju statements on Gujarat in the section on Politics about Arun Jaitley since they were not referred to by Jaitley. This focus of this section is the Jaitley-Katju dispute. Katju's views on Gujarat violence are covered elsewhere on this page.
00:4500:45, 8 April 2013 diff hist −110 Markandey Katju Jaitley's criticism of Katju makes no reference to the disputed Nanavati commission of enquiry hence i deleted the reference to Nanavati commission. Please do not put words in the mouth of Arun Jaitley.
00:3700:37, 8 April 2013 diff hist +208 m Markandey Katju Added a reference
00:3400:34, 8 April 2013 diff hist +1 m Markandey Katju a minor grammar correction
00:3200:32, 8 April 2013 diff hist −350 Markandey Katju Removed the edit about Katju criticizing Javed Akhtar and Gulzar. Reference provided does not support the claim. It is the view of the journalist that Katju was referring to them, and is hence an unreliable claim.
00:2600:26, 8 April 2013 diff hist +3,294 Markandey Katju Cleaned up the section 'Stand on Pakistan' by providing additional details and references

17:2617:26, 7 April 2013 diff hist +228 User talk:Lanet303 My comment on User:Neelkamala's comment
11:5511:55, 7 April 2013 diff hist +123 User talk:Soham321 Defended my edits
11:5011:50, 7 April 2013 diff hist +6,407 Markandey Katju Undid revision 549137785 by MohitSingh (talk)Blatant Vandalism by User:MohitSingh
05:2305:23, 7 April 2013 diff hist +6,407 Markandey Katju Undid revision 549106333 by Neelkamala (talk) Blatant Vandalism by User:Neelkamala
04:2704:27, 7 April 2013 diff hist +314 Markandey Katju Undid revision 549092941 by Neelkamala (talk) it is not a dubious claim and it is relevant since it shows his background. The book is a scholarly work and I have given the OCLC reference
02:3102:31, 7 April 2013 diff hist +14 Markandey Katju added the word 'traditionally'
02:2902:29, 7 April 2013 diff hist +709 Markandey Katju Added details about Katju's views on Pakistan with references
02:0902:09, 7 April 2013 diff hist +974 Markandey Katju Corrected a link and added a comment of Nariman with references
01:5701:57, 7 April 2013 diff hist +1,234 Markandey Katju Re-wrote the section on Katju's views on corruption and Salman Rushdie by giving more details and references
01:2601:26, 7 April 2013 diff hist +748 Markandey Katju re-wrote the section on 90% Indians are fools by providing details.
01:0301:03, 7 April 2013 diff hist +2,457 Markandey Katju Re-wrote the section on Katju's criticism of Mamata Banerjee to make it more accurate by providing details
00:1500:15, 7 April 2013 diff hist +214 Markandey Katju Added Amarendra Sharan's views on Katju. Changed 'Criticism and Controversies' sub-heading to 'Controversies, Criticism and Praise'

23:5923:59, 6 April 2013 diff hist −117 Markandey Katju Possible vandalism detected. Reference provided does not support the claim that is being made about "most lawyers" being critical of Katju , hence i am deleting the claim.
23:5423:54, 6 April 2013 diff hist −631 Markandey Katju Possible vandalism detected. Reference provided has no mention of claim made with respect to the Sanjay Dutt pardon issue. The Sanjay Dutt appeal has many supporters and many critics.
23:4023:40, 6 April 2013 diff hist +438 Markandey Katju Added information about Khalil Chishti
23:3123:31, 6 April 2013 diff hist −12 Markandey Katju changed 'forced to clarify' to 'clarified' with respect to the 90 percent of Indians fools statement. Nobody forced him to clarify; he did so on his own.
23:2723:27, 6 April 2013 diff hist +874 Markandey Katju Again added information about endorsement of Katju's views on Gujarat violence by Justice Khare and Fali Nariman. This had been deleted by User:Neelkamala
23:0323:03, 6 April 2013 diff hist +314 Markandey Katju Added the information about Shiva Nath Katju again with reference which user:Neelkamala had deleted.

02:1302:13, 2 April 2013 diff hist −202 Markandey Katju Mamata Banerjee never criticized him by name and he never said W Bengal Babus are being subjected to Nuremberg style trials
02:0902:09, 2 April 2013 diff hist −622 Markandey Katju Removed one sided entry since it violates Wikipedia rules. The Sanjay Dutt appeal has many critics but also many supporters.

01:4901:49, 30 March 2013 diff hist −612 Markandey Katju Removed one-sided and prejudiced entry the basis of which is a website of little repute.

01:5001:50, 26 March 2013 diff hist +80 Markandey Katju No edit summary

17:1117:11, 25 March 2013 diff hist −135 Markandey Katju Modified the last sentence and deleted what was clearly a personal subjective opinion not supported by any references.

15:0415:04, 24 March 2013 diff hist +946 Markandey Katju Undid revision 546711399 by Neelkamala (talk) link to amazon.com is not dead and hardnewsmedia article is corroborated by the article in the Hindu
00:4000:40, 24 March 2013 diff hist +946 Markandey Katju Undid revision 545918637 by Neelkamala (talk). Neelkamala is guilty of removing information which is in the public domain. Also I modified the language to make it more neutral and detached.