Jump to content

User talk:Hizubiki25

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AlistairMcMillan (talk | contribs) at 22:46, 5 April 2021 (Naver Matone). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Why do you keep trying to recreate an article that keeps being speedy deleted?

Also didn't they also shut the service last year?

Lastly did you read the guidance above about conflict of interest editing? AlistairMcMillan (talk) 03:33, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I did read the conflict of interest editing and it does not count as advertising. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hizubiki25 (talkcontribs) 13:24, April 5, 2021 (UTC)
@AlistairMcMillan and Deb: this has been moved to mainspace twice today, if I am not mistaken. One is back in draft. The mainspace artifact is Naver Matome (service). Deb salted Naver Matome earlier. --- Possibly (talk) 20:09, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Just because you haven't heard of something doesn't mean its fucking advertising. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hizubiki25 (talkcontribs) 20:55, April 5, 2021 (UTC)
Swearing here and on multiple other pages won't help. Logging out to twice remove speedy tags won't help. Moving the Naver Matome page to mainspace won't help, especially when an admin has salted one name version and another admin has asked you explicitly why you keep moving this to mainspace. What would help is finding proper independent sources for the article, and rewriting it in draft space so that it does not look liked a huge advertisement. The article is not of the standard required for mainspace, which is why it has been moved to draft so many times. --- Possibly (talk) 21:26, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It WRITEN like A NORMAL PERSON WOULD and it USES INDEPENDENT FUCKING SOURCES so please STOP DELETING THE FUCKING ARTICLE — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hizubiki25 (talkcontribs) 22:01, April 5, 2021 (UTC)
Would you like to be blocked from editing? Because refusing to work with other editors, and refusing to follow Wikipedia policies is a good way to get yourself blocked from editing. AlistairMcMillan (talk) 22:05, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe you should censor articles for "advertising" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hizubiki25 (talkcontribs) 22:07, April 5, 2021 (UTC)
@Hizubiki25: calm down for a moment and listen. The article you created is extremley poor. It has one independent source. It reads like ad advertisement, which is my opinion and the opinion of several other editors with more experience than I have. So that is the main problem: you continue to publish a poorly written article into mainspace. The fact that you continue to swear about it, force the article back to mainspace, remove speedy tags using an IP and so on... those are problems that you are creating for yourself that will probably lead to you being blocked soon. Every other editor who has seen the Naver Matome article has told you it has too many problems to remain in mainspace. You can continue to ignore advice, but you're really wasting everyone's time. All you have to do is develop it in draft with good sources. --- Possibly (talk) 22:19, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding this message you left me, the majority of the policies of the Korean Wikipedia and the English Wikipedia are not connected. Wikipedias in different languages develop different rules for what can be included and what is an advertisent or promotion.--- Possibly (talk) 22:32, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. Created and deleted seven times so far. AlistairMcMillan (talk) 22:46, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Naver matome requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MadD (talk) 22:16, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]