Jump to content

Talk:Avengers: Endgame

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dimadick (talk | contribs) at 16:29, 24 December 2022. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Good articleAvengers: Endgame has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 25, 2020Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 12, 2020.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Avengers: Endgame was untitled until December 2018, as its title was considered a spoiler for the film and its predecessor, Avengers: Infinity War?

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 March 2019 and 10 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Lcerone.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:44, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 8 March 2022

Change character Pepper Potts description from Stark's husband to Stark's wife. 24.209.237.242 (talk) 03:44, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Changed. Thanks for catching that. --ZimZalaBim talk 04:00, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism

] Anthony Lane of The New Yorker gave the film a compromising review, finding it to be overdeveloped and overwrought, stating, "The one thing you do need to know about Avengers: Endgame is that it runs for a little over three hours, and that you can easily duck out during the middle hour, do some shopping, and slip back into your seat for the climax. You won't have missed a thing."[200] It was criticsed for its 3 hour screen time. Can we please add that In the critical section of the info box. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reference878 (talkcontribs) 04:01, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do we need to? I’m sure the sample we have is ample CreecregofLife (talk) 04:08, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 20 July 2022

Please add the following template to the page:

2601:241:300:B610:D80F:9308:353B:DFF7 (talk) 23:16, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, it's been added. Harrison (talk) 01:54, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 20 August 2022

Change "A fifth and sixth film" to "Two standalone sequels". 2600:1700:4390:5850:C160:464A:47C7:8ADD (talk) 03:53, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Partly done: Removed "standalone" since we don't know about that and the link per MOS:OL Aaron Liu (talk) 01:09, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Reverted as they are more "future" films than "sequels" and thus, stating "fifth and sixth film" is accurate. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:13, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]