User talk:IANVS

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by .

IANVS (talk) is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion, guidelines for use at WP:MINOR). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.

For well-established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:54, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Martín García (1814) and Project Military History

(Message also copied to User:DagosNavy and User:MBelgrano)
I have noticed (not for the first time), there is very little input into the Project Military History from our side. Of our battles (Independence and Civil War) one of the best articles we have to offer is Battle of Martín García (1814). Somebody (don't know who) had reviewed it and found it lacking. I did most of the translation from es:wp. I'd love to hear your input and see what we can do to get more of South American military history into a more prominent display at MilHist. Please don't discuss here but better at the article's talk page so we can keep all the comments together. -- Alexf^(talk) 15:14, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Major changes in Argentines of European descent

Hi, IANVS. I ask you to help me persuade GiovBag not to make major changes in the article before seeking consensus. I reverted his arbitrary changes twice today. I dont want to violate 3RR, and I think he needs to see that we are many who support the article as it is. It may need addition of sections not amputation of paragraphs, sources or photos.--Pablozeta (talk) 18:57, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Argentines of European descent. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

It is simple. Am just try to help you to save this article, neutralizing some things, but you don't listen a word. If you make the same thing, than White Argentine, but changing the name, the article, sooner or later, will be deleted. In fact, you never responded to the observation, even your reasons strengthened my arguments. The other is just not want to acknowledge an obvious fact. --GiovBag (talk) 00:17, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, it doesn't matter if you "are right". This is to be discussed at the talk page. And, by the way, you are pretty cynical, warning me of 3RR after half a dozen reversal on your part since yesterday. --IANVS (talk) 00:21, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have left a message for you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:GiovBag reported by User:IANVS (Result: protected). - 2/0 (cont.) 01:35, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ARGENTINO

JAJAJAJAJJAJAJAA Argentino tenias que ser, que os creeis todos Arios Italianos (cuando los italiuanos son mas negros que los españoles, pero bueno, la ignorancia es extrema en America), ala, sigue pensando que España es Mejico, aun que a mi me de rabia, que me la da, al ver que unos extranjeruchos tienen mas potestad que yo para definir a mi pais, sigue pensando que Argentina es Italia y que España es sudamerica pero en Europa... es que de verdad, que igggggggggnorante. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.222.158.37 (talk) 12:36, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

¿? --IANVS (talk) 20:18, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]