User contributions for SDY

6 November 2011

• 08:5008:50, 6 November 2011 diff hist +100 m Wikipedia:Village pump (technical) →Chrome and the edit function: additional clarification
• 08:4808:48, 6 November 2011 diff hist +9 Wikipedia:JARGON The redirect appears to be broken. This appears to work.
• 08:4608:46, 6 November 2011 diff hist +689 Wikipedia:Village pump (technical) Chrome, editing, and strange behavior
• 08:4108:41, 6 November 2011 diff hist +27 Alzheimer's disease Undid revision 459247486 by Pragmatist (talk) The lead has to be accessible, not WP:JARGON like "primary" and "progressive".

5 November 2011

• 19:5319:53, 5 November 2011 diff hist +89 Malaria Writing so that it (hopefully) cannot be misunderstood. Pitching the SMH as a source and going directly to the WHO publication.
• 02:5902:59, 5 November 2011 diff hist −1 m Boeing 737 →Accidents and incidents: extra space
• 02:5902:59, 5 November 2011 diff hist +71 Boeing 737 →Accidents and incidents: Citing wikipedia does us no good.

4 November 2011

• 21:4821:48, 4 November 2011 diff hist +390 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Majuba Aviation crash (2nd nomination) Delete. Just another statistic.
• 20:2820:28, 4 November 2011 diff hist +81 User:SDY Another possible article.
• 20:2620:26, 4 November 2011 diff hist +386 Blood donation →Types of donation: Therapeutics. Not sure what to do about the red link.
• 20:2020:20, 4 November 2011 diff hist +20 Blood donation →Benefits and Incentives: Rewriting a bit.
• 19:4219:42, 4 November 2011 diff hist +751 Wikipedia:Reference desk/Science →Do cooked carrots have more calories than raw carrots? Why?: Which calorie count are we talking about? Also, glycemic index may work into diet plans.
• 16:0316:03, 4 November 2011 diff hist +354 Wikipedia:Reference desk/Humanities →How are statutes of limitations good for the people?: Evidence isn't immortal.
• 06:1506:15, 4 November 2011 diff hist +357 Talk:Occupy Wall Street →Cherry-picked list of "international" comments: Wow.
• 05:4505:45, 4 November 2011 diff hist +551 Talk:Occupy Wall Street Obviously cherry-picked international quotes section is obviously not neutral.
• 05:1105:11, 4 November 2011 diff hist +346 Talk:Occupy Wall Street →Organizational Support: Conflicting number of arrests.
• 04:5504:55, 4 November 2011 diff hist −97 User:SDY Redundant
• 04:5304:53, 4 November 2011 diff hist +242 m Packed red blood cells →Compatibility testing: Another ref.
• 04:4804:48, 4 November 2011 diff hist +309 Packed red blood cells →Compatibility testing: Wish I had a tech manual handy to reference this. The ref doesn't actually cover the whole previous sentence.
• 04:4304:43, 4 November 2011 diff hist +244 User:SDY More work to do.
• 04:3304:33, 4 November 2011 diff hist +2 m Packed red blood cells fmt
• 04:3104:31, 4 November 2011 diff hist +182 Packed red blood cells Not the best source, but it'll do.
• 04:2804:28, 4 November 2011 diff hist +406 Packed red blood cells More references. Removing the unref'ed tag. Obviously more sources is always better, but it's not completely unreferenced.
• 04:2404:24, 4 November 2011 diff hist −1,571 User talk:SDY Undid revision 458923208 by RobertMfromLI (talk) Reverted unread, I've moved on and don't want to go back.
• 04:2304:23, 4 November 2011 diff hist +451 m Packed red blood cells Honestly, this entire article could be done with this one reference.
• 04:2004:20, 4 November 2011 diff hist +18 m Packed red blood cells →Clinical aspects: more info
• 04:1904:19, 4 November 2011 diff hist +231 Packed red blood cells another ref
• 04:1704:17, 4 November 2011 diff hist −2 m Packed red blood cells fmt
• 04:1604:16, 4 November 2011 diff hist +19 m Packed red blood cells →Clinical aspects: Err, naming the reference correctly.
• 04:1504:15, 4 November 2011 diff hist +229 Packed red blood cells Adding a reference
• 04:1204:12, 4 November 2011 diff hist +801 User talk:RobertMfromLI Responding to your accusations
• 04:0404:04, 4 November 2011 diff hist +516 Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not Bowing out, I had no interest in the Muhammad debate and this is just a coatrack of that discussion.
• 03:5203:52, 4 November 2011 diff hist +159 Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not →Proposed change to WP:NOTCENSORED: Uh, we have sock/meatpuppet problems anyway, I think we know how to deal with them.
• 03:4603:46, 4 November 2011 diff hist +291 Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not →Comments: Ugh, exactly what I wanted to avoid.
• 03:3903:39, 4 November 2011 diff hist +612 Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not →Proposed change to WP:NOTCENSORED: Two other thoughts to consider in the proposed language.
• 03:3103:31, 4 November 2011 diff hist +629 Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not →Comments: One size fits all just doesn't match what reliable sources use.
• 03:0603:06, 4 November 2011 diff hist +547 Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not →Proposed change to WP:NOTCENSORED: Just trying to make this debate about policy, not about resurrecting a specific horse
• 03:0003:00, 4 November 2011 diff hist +221 Talk:Occupy Wall Street →Disputed graph of # of news stories: Tea Party vs. OWS: WP:OReally?
• 02:5402:54, 4 November 2011 diff hist +494 Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not →Proposed change to WP:NOTCENSORED: Propose explicitly not applying this change to the Muhammad article.
• 01:3201:32, 4 November 2011 diff hist +1,031 Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not →NOTCENSORED does not protect incidental material: Four ideas, which vaguely fall into one camp.
• 01:1601:16, 4 November 2011 diff hist +130 Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not Kind of confused about the questions. Random copy-edit as well
• 00:3800:38, 4 November 2011 diff hist +16 Occupy Wall Street →International: The entire article has problems, but the cheerleader squad here is certainly one of them. See repeated comments on talk page.
• 00:1300:13, 4 November 2011 diff hist +346 Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not →Questions: Question for supporters of option 4 on the third question above.
• 00:0700:07, 4 November 2011 diff hist +292 Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not →Censorship as argument: In the right direction. Where I think there's disagreement, and what a possible future version of this question might ask.

3 November 2011

• 21:3821:38, 3 November 2011 diff hist +748 Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not →Censorship as argument: Trying to clarify.
• 21:1221:12, 3 November 2011 diff hist +289 Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not →Censorship as argument: Clarifying
• 20:4520:45, 3 November 2011 diff hist +351 Talk:Occupy Wall Street →Question: OI glosses over OR, but does not excuse NPOV issues.
• 20:3520:35, 3 November 2011 diff hist +119 Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not →The current policy: Being a little more explicit in the question.
• 20:2920:29, 3 November 2011 diff hist +307 Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not →Questions: Go ahead and change it.
• 20:2320:23, 3 November 2011 diff hist +1,955 Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not Straw poll, trying to get a sense of where people stand on three topics.