User talk:InNeed95

Inquiry

Hello there, I was wondering if you could activate your email address so that we can share some resources via email. Excine (talk) 22:32, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Input regarding the North Kosovo Crisis (2021) article

Hello. You contribute to the article and state on your userpage that you speak Albanian. Is there any missing information in the article that's present in Albanian language sources? Thank you. Dege31 (talk) 14:56, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Dege31: I think the Article shares enough information regarding the recent events in the North and does not need further adjustments.--InNeed95 (talk) 11:59, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Block

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one month for edit warring. Too much edit warring and too many recent blocks. This behaviour isn't sustainable. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 17:32, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

InNeed95 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I know I made the same mistake again. Using the revert option to make the other User join on the TP discussion. But as you may see, 2 other sympathizers of the other User joined in Editing/reverting. That why I additionally reverted their Edits/reverts and messaged them thru their TP immediatly afterwards to join the discussion on the TP. 1 2 I additionally warned the other User, that was not willing to join the TP (see User talk:Klačko). I have started the discussion relativly early (see Talk:Serbia). I concluded, that after the todays edit/revert by the other User, that he wont act as wished in the future, thats why I requested a Protection of the Article. 3 I was first thinking about requesting help from a Admin. Actually @El C:, I was thinking about asking you again for help, but I remembered, that you said, that I shouldnt do so :D . So I requested the Protection instead. Additionally, I was thinking, that after the Article would have been protected, about requesting a Third Opinion... to join the TP-Discussion. But as far as all of us can see, I have been blocked with the relativly long block for "Edit-Warring". El_C, I hope you can see that I am improving in trying to solve disputes. As such, I hope you understand that I was not looking forward for things to escalate. Best Regards, -- InNeed95 (talk) 18:33, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I know I made the same mistake again. Using the revert option to make the other User join on the TP discussion. But as you may see, 2 other sympathizers of the other User joined in Editing/reverting. That why I additionally reverted their Edits/reverts and messaged them thru their TP immediatly afterwards to join the discussion on the TP. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MareBG&diff=prev&oldid=1050535755 1] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Soundwaweserb&diff=prev&oldid=1050391502 2] I additionally warned the other User, that was not willing to join the TP (see [[User talk:Klačko]]). I have started the discussion relativly early (see [[Talk:Serbia]]). I concluded, that after the todays edit/revert by the other User, that he wont act as wished in the future, thats why I requested a Protection of the Article. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection/Increase&diff=1050567092&oldid=1050565137 3] I was first thinking about requesting help from a Admin. Actually <span class="template-ping">@[[User:El C|El C]]:</span>, I was thinking about asking you again for help, but I remembered, that you said, that I shouldnt do so :D . So I requested the Protection instead. Additionally, I was thinking, that after the Article would have been protected, about requesting a Third Opinion... to join the TP-Discussion. But as far as all of us can see, I have been blocked with the relativly long block for "Edit-Warring". El_C, I hope you can see that I am improving in trying to solve disputes. As such, I hope you understand that I was not looking forward for things to escalate. Best Regards, -- [[User:InNeed95|InNeed95]] ([[User talk:InNeed95#top|talk]]) 18:33, 18 October 2021 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I know I made the same mistake again. Using the revert option to make the other User join on the TP discussion. But as you may see, 2 other sympathizers of the other User joined in Editing/reverting. That why I additionally reverted their Edits/reverts and messaged them thru their TP immediatly afterwards to join the discussion on the TP. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MareBG&diff=prev&oldid=1050535755 1] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Soundwaweserb&diff=prev&oldid=1050391502 2] I additionally warned the other User, that was not willing to join the TP (see [[User talk:Klačko]]). I have started the discussion relativly early (see [[Talk:Serbia]]). I concluded, that after the todays edit/revert by the other User, that he wont act as wished in the future, thats why I requested a Protection of the Article. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection/Increase&diff=1050567092&oldid=1050565137 3] I was first thinking about requesting help from a Admin. Actually <span class="template-ping">@[[User:El C|El C]]:</span>, I was thinking about asking you again for help, but I remembered, that you said, that I shouldnt do so :D . So I requested the Protection instead. Additionally, I was thinking, that after the Article would have been protected, about requesting a Third Opinion... to join the TP-Discussion. But as far as all of us can see, I have been blocked with the relativly long block for "Edit-Warring". El_C, I hope you can see that I am improving in trying to solve disputes. As such, I hope you understand that I was not looking forward for things to escalate. Best Regards, -- [[User:InNeed95|InNeed95]] ([[User talk:InNeed95#top|talk]]) 18:33, 18 October 2021 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I know I made the same mistake again. Using the revert option to make the other User join on the TP discussion. But as you may see, 2 other sympathizers of the other User joined in Editing/reverting. That why I additionally reverted their Edits/reverts and messaged them thru their TP immediatly afterwards to join the discussion on the TP. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MareBG&diff=prev&oldid=1050535755 1] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Soundwaweserb&diff=prev&oldid=1050391502 2] I additionally warned the other User, that was not willing to join the TP (see [[User talk:Klačko]]). I have started the discussion relativly early (see [[Talk:Serbia]]). I concluded, that after the todays edit/revert by the other User, that he wont act as wished in the future, thats why I requested a Protection of the Article. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection/Increase&diff=1050567092&oldid=1050565137 3] I was first thinking about requesting help from a Admin. Actually <span class="template-ping">@[[User:El C|El C]]:</span>, I was thinking about asking you again for help, but I remembered, that you said, that I shouldnt do so :D . So I requested the Protection instead. Additionally, I was thinking, that after the Article would have been protected, about requesting a Third Opinion... to join the TP-Discussion. But as far as all of us can see, I have been blocked with the relativly long block for "Edit-Warring". El_C, I hope you can see that I am improving in trying to solve disputes. As such, I hope you understand that I was not looking forward for things to escalate. Best Regards, -- [[User:InNeed95|InNeed95]] ([[User talk:InNeed95#top|talk]]) 18:33, 18 October 2021 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Comment

@El C: I am curious in why the other User, that was Edit_Warring, did not get blocked? / + Why did you deny the protection request while not blocking the other Users? Adding that the same Article was the object of Edit-Warring in the recent months. --InNeed95 (talk) 18:37, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

InNeed95, you were edit warring, against more than one participant, all while disregarding WP:ONUS. You get no special allowances by filing the protection request. Your last edit warring block was for 2 weeks (which was barely a month ago!), so a month seems like a reasonable escalation.

With all your blocks, it doesn't look like you've ever reviewed WP:GAB (at least closely), or your unblock request above would address these problems on your part, rather than going on about the content dispute or otherwise WP:NOTTHEM kind of remarks. You should really consider the long-term rather than responding reflexively like that to the immediate moment (current block). El_C 18:49, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@El C: I know that I was Edit-Warring. I did not deny it! I said, I was not really looking forward to it and tried to solve the issue thru protection requests (as suggested by yourself) and messaging the other Users thru their TP's to join the Discussion on the Articles TP. / The 2 week block was already exaggerated, considering I was trying to solve the issue and the counterpart didnt. Same goes to the current situation. The counterpart was unwilling to cooperate, while I was (As seen in aboves explaination). Not even going to further explain on why a month is unreasonable and extreme.../ How many edits did I do in the last month? Barely any. Only minor things. Of course there will be mistakes done by my side. Everybody makes mistakes. I aint a Pro on these things to make everything right like you*. / I gave care to the most important parts of WP:GAB. I explained my mistake. I acknowledged it in its full form. To strengthen my position, I wrote about the mistakes of the others. As of WP:NOTTHEM this may not be wished, but I felt like I had to show the wrongdoings of the others. I will adjust my unblock request to fit with WP:NOTTHEM. / Btw, these comments are not meant to be included in the unblock request.--InNeed95 (talk) 20:20, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]