Jump to content

User talk:79.101.140.54

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Chip3004 (talk | contribs) at 18:41, 11 July 2022 (→BQ). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

BQ

Please stop removing info from the Bloc Quebecois page. Bring your reasons for removal to its talkpage & seek a consensus. GoodDay (talk) 18:21, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I just fix vandalism, unsourced or original reseach is for blogs and not for encyclopedia and just can mislead and confuse readers. 79.101.140.54 (talk) 18:24, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You're edit-warring, which isn't permitted. Bring your arguments to that article's talkpage. Repeatedly removing mass info, will only lead to your getting blocked. GoodDay (talk) 18:26, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Removing not sourced vandalism or original research and you keep to add it. Removing vandalism is ok and not edit war but you adding it is the problem. Find sources or stop doing vandalism as you can get reported. 79.101.140.54 (talk) 18:30, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Wise up. GoodDay (talk) 18:31, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It does not matter, as you are edit warring Chip3004 (talk) 18:35, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not to mention, exhibiting SPA & OWN behaviour. GoodDay (talk) 18:38, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Bloc Québécois shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Chip3004 (talk) 18:38, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Chip3004 (talk) 18:41, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:79.101.140.54&oldid=1097619360"