User talk:James1221911

February 2022

Hi James1221911! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Republican Party (United States) that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. ––FormalDude talk 01:58, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Australian Values Party (March 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NORG, requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources. The AVP website is a primary source and therefore not independent.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Australian Values Party and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Australian Values Party, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 06:39, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, James1221911! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 06:39, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article has been updated so as to include coverage in multiple independent secondary sources, and resubmitted.1.126.110.253 (talk) 00:31, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Pauline Hanson's One Nation, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Read WP:BRD and MOS:INFOBOXREF. Vacant0 (talk) 10:47, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:James1221911 reported by User:Vacant0 (Result: ). Thank you. Vacant0 (talk) 12:21, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

bruh go outside lmao JamesJ (talk) 12:40, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Australian Values Party has been accepted

Australian Values Party, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman (talk) 15:35, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ideologies

You don't need to add the word "Australian" to ideologies in words about Australian political parties. It's not going to be British liberalism or American liberalism, is it. ITBF (talk) 10:52, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You silly billy!!! The article is linked to Australian Liberalism and Conservatism. Now it may be an Australian political party, but Conservatism is a broad term. Using (Australian) shows the reader it can be more specific. For example, the American Republican Party uses the ideology "Conservatism". The Conservatism of the LPA is greatly different to that of the GOP. This shows that. JamesJ (talk) 12:25, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: National Right (Liberal Party of Australia) (July 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curbon7 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:National Right (Liberal Party of Australia) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curbon7 (talk) 14:32, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Brereton

Hello. As has been clearly pointed out already, your edits to Paul Brereton are in violation of WP:BLP, WP:V and WP:BRD. Your original edit was reverted, per WP:BLP and WP:BRD, as an uncited addition to a biography of a living person. You then re-added the material with a reference that does not support the edit, thus failing verification (WP:V). Continuing to re-add unsupported material to a BLP, while accusing others of disruptive editing, goes against WP:BRD and WP:3RR. I would strongly suggest you brush up on Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, as your editing is disruptive and not in the spirit of the project. Abraham, B.S. (talk) 23:51, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Go outside lol. JamesJ (talk) 08:56, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]