Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NGC 7454

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NASTRO. All coverage appears to be in comprehensive sources, databases, or passing mentions in the literature, with nothing dedicated specifically to this galaxy. ^Complex/_Rational 17:09, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. ^Complex/_Rational 17:09, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This galaxy was discovered in 1784 so it seems it does meet WP:NASTRO #4.[1] Thincat (talk) 19:10, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Good catch; I missed that part. I still have concerns about the apparent dearth of sources, though I could see this being redirected or left as a WP:PERMASTUB if a pre-1850 discovery is sufficient by itself. ^Complex/_Rational 19:24, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep: While I didn't find any dedicated studies, it has been the target of a number of amateur observations and has entries in a pair of observer catalogues. I added some data with references and links to the other language wikipedias. Praemonitus (talk) 16:24, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:22, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:02, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep. I agree with some of the nominator's concerns, though as WP:NASTRO criteria 4 states that The object was discovered before 1850, prior to the use of astrophotography or automated technology I am at weak keep. There appears to be a few Google Scholar articles based on a preview version, 1, 2, 3, though I'm unsure whether these are trivial mentions or sources that could be useful towards expanding this stub. VickKiang (talk) 21:01, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:08, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

* Keep as it was discovered at an interesting time period HeliosSunGod (talk) 03:49, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]