User talk:MicroSupporter

Hello, MicroSupporter, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Ahunt (talk) 15:58, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

September 2022

Hello, I'm Blaze Wolf. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Donetsk, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 13:24, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Other accounts

Hello. Have you used other accounts to edit Wikipedia? Sdrqaz (talk) 10:56, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, this is my only account. MicroSupporter (talk) 11:24, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Verdis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Verdis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Verdis (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Joy [shallot] (talk) 17:53, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MicroWiki

Hello! Do you also edit over at MicroWiki? If not, we could always use some experienced contributors like you, and as you may or may not know, MicroWiki has far less strict criteria for notability when it comes to micronations! LuxorCZ (talk) 20:16, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:LuxorCZ, I only edit on Wikipedia. I will consider taking a look at MicroWiki though as I have heard of it! In the meantime, could you please help me defend this case? Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Verdis (2nd nomination) - thanks! MicroSupporter (talk) 20:25, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#Verdis regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. 𓃦LunaEatsTuna (💬) 18:31, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Donetsk

Hey. Please note that there is a new general sanction; only extended-confirmed users are allowed to edit articles related to the Russo-Ukrainian War (WP:GS/RUSUKR). Additionally, please do not restore contentious unsourced content into articles (WP:BURDEN). Prolog (talk) 16:00, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Prolog (talk · contribs), thank you for letting me know. I was just changing the infobox to what it looks like for Sevastopol. de facto russia, de jure ukraine MicroSupporter (talk) 16:24, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! MicroSupporter, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:11, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Answering your AfD question

Since this discussion was closed before I could reply, you shouldn't worry about "bumping" an AfD discussion. Once the typical 7 day review period is up for the AfD, an uninvolved editor (usually an Admin) will either delete the article, keep the article, close the discussion as "no consensus", or relist the discussion for another 7 days (effectively "bumping" it by moving it to the most recent daily log). If the discussion does not result in consensus, the default is for the article to be kept. You can see WP:CLOSEAFD for more details. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 01:09, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh okay. Thank you for answering my question! MicroSupporter (talk) 14:20, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Vít Jedlička. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 13:47, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

MicroSupporter (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked by Guerillero for edit warring on Vit Jedlicka a day after the edit war occurred. I had apologised on the ANI the day prior and yet was still blocked by this admin later on. I originaly edit warred as I was going off of what I saw on other micronational WP:BLP's, which I shouldn't have gone off of and I had acknowledged that and apologised, yet I've now been blocked a day later for 24 hours even after acknowledging my mistake. Doesn't feel very fair. I was also wound up as I thought AndyTheGrump was having a go at me like he did on another topic. I also saw on the ANI that I made that the admin that blocked me wants to push a topic ban on me. I'm not quite sure why? I acknowledged what I reverted was wrong and apologised, and will make sure not to do it again. I am doing my best to write on Wikipedia as neutrally possible. MicroSupporter (talk) 13:59, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I thought it was the 19th for some reason. Unblocked --Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 14:20, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've got to say that I think the block a little harsh, myself, coming at this late stage. AndyTheGrump (talk) 14:15, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Andy. I apologise for my wrongdoings. I think we both got a little heated at eachother in the past few days haha MicroSupporter (talk) 14:20, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to join Wikipedia:WikiProject Autonomous Zones

Hello. I noticed you were involved in discussions related to micronations and wanted to know whether you would like to join a wikiproject dedicated to documenting more serious various types of autonomous zones across the world.

You can join here Wikipedia:WikiProject Autonomous Zones DominusVilicus (talk) 11:23, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for sending! I will look into it! MicroSupporter (talk) 15:09, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:President of Verdis visiting the micronation.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:President of Verdis visiting the micronation.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:02, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Apollon Zimmermann" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Apollon Zimmermann and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 4#Apollon Zimmermann until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ■ ∃ Madeline ⇔ ∃ Part of me ; 12:46, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Liberland Press

Hello, MicroSupporter

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username VickKiang, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Liberland Press, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|VickKiang}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

VickKiang (talk) 21:16, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Inviting you to collaborate on Draft:Lumina_(Proposed_City)

Hi, since you are a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject Autonomous Zones to help assist the creation, sourcing and drafting of the Draft:Lumina_(Proposed_City) city, which is Network State and movement to establish an autonomous city. I ask that you do not move this article to the mainspace until editors are sufficiently happy with the reliable sourcing of information about the movement. HeliosSunGod (talk) 06:06, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]