Jump to content

Talk:2022 FIFA World Cup final

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 2001:8f8:173d:aea6:f10e:7585:374e:e519 (talk) at 08:52, 14 January 2023 (→added considerably to the summary: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:51, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 3 December 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved (non-admin closure) Iffy★Chat -- 16:12, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 FIFA World Cup Final → 2022 FIFA World Cup final – per WP:NCCAPS, and consensus at Talk:UEFA Women's Euro 1995 final. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 12:19, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TITLECON is an essay, not a policy - arguably these should all be lowercase "f", rather than upper case, however, with the final of this event likely to have a very large viewership over the coming days, it's better to focus on this event and it's merits of correct title. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 22:34, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

al rihla

File:Al-Hilm.jpg
Al-Hilm, the Official Matchball for the 2022 FIFA World Cup Semi-Finals and Finals

The match ball for the 2022 FIFA World Cup Final and semi-finals, announced on 11 December 2022, features a variation of the Adidas Al-Rihla named the Adidas Al-Hilm, meaning 'The Dream' in Arabic, a reference to every nation's dream of lifting the FIFA World Cup. [1] Whilst the technical aspects of the ball are the same, the colour is different from the Al-Rihla balls used in the group stages and preceding knockout games, with a "Gold Metallic", Maroon, "Collegiate Burgundy", and Red design,[2] a reference to the national colors of host nation Qatar and the golden colors shared by the Final's venue and the FIFA World Cup Trophy. It is the fifth special ball for FIFA World Cup final matches,[3] after the +Teamgeist Berlin (2006), Jo'bulani (2010), Brazuca Final Rio (2014), and Telstar Mechta (2018). HyperionLEO (talk) 10:20, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "adidas reveals the FIFA World Cup™ official Finals match ball". FIFA.com. 2022-12-11. Retrieved 2022-12-11.
  2. ^ https://www.adidas.ae/en/al-hilm-pro-football/HC0437.html
  3. ^ The special version for Russia 2018 was used in all knockout stage games.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:52, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:1930 FIFA World Cup Final which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 14:32, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Route to the final

are we going to write a lengthy article for the final based on the standards used for past World Cup? hy[Ω]🐐 HyperionLEO (talk). 06:19, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

in case anyone requires it

Dignitaries in attendance

hy[Ω]🐐 HyperionLEO (talk). 21:55, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why would anyone need an WP:INDISCRIMINATE list of people in attendance for an event. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 22:06, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
hey, I ain't the one who thinks this is important, or necessary lol. matter of fact, I deleted this section from the actual article. I just posted the source code here in case there's anyone who wants to employ it or discuss about it. hy[Ω]🐐 HyperionLEO (talk). 22:46, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "Macron 'immensely proud' that France in World Cup final". Associated Press. 14 December 2022. Retrieved 15 December 2022.

Request to change the page to semi-protected status

After repeated examples of vandalism by accountless IPs, I request that an administrator example - Lee Vilenski please lock this article page. Thank you hy[Ω]🐐 HyperionLEO (talk). 12:45, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RfPP is the correct location for such a request. I have given it temporary autoconfirmed protection.Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 16:17, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seven French substitutions?

How could France make seven substitutions? Was one of them a "concussion substitution" (or whatever it's called)? Which, in that case? 20:28, 18 December 2022 (UTC) Fomalhaut76 (talk) 20:28, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It was the Rabiot injury. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:16, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Player of the match wording

The award is "player of the match" per this image and source. It is not man of the match.—Bagumba (talk) 21:07, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The practice is Man of the match on English Wikipedia.--Island92 (talk) 21:15, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
FIFA World Cup awards suggests "man" was last used in 2018. If FIFA has "player" on the award now, I don't see why we would use an incorrect name for a 2022-related page. —Bagumba (talk) 21:30, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with you. If FIFA has agreed on being the "Player of the match", then we should follow it rather than doing the opposite. JoshuaInWiki (talk) 04:40, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Bagumba: Sure, but in that case we need to either start an RFC or some sort of village pump, as there are dozens of articles with this wording. Wretchskull (talk) 13:45, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Wretchskull: My question here is solely for 2022. I'm not pursuing past years, as I can respect if "man of the match" should happen to remain there, as that was at least the actual name of the award at the time. That seems like an independent discussion, if someone wants to pursue it. Regards. —Bagumba (talk) 13:54, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:07, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 19 December 2022

In the first paragraph, the phrase "The final took place in front of 88,966 supporters..." appears to be false and should either be corrected or removed. Lusail Stadium's published capacity is exactly 88,966 spectators. Several sources (references below plus Twitter search queries) state and show evidence that there were many empty seats during the final match. It is not possible for the match to take place in front of 88,966 supporters AND for there to be empty seats. The assertion that the stadium was at full capacity at any point in time is at best questionable. References: 

 https://sports.yahoo.com/embarrassing-world-cup-final-plays-162458869.html
 https://technosports.co.in/2022/12/19/fifa-world-cup-final-france-argentin/
 https://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/world-cup/final-empty-seats-argentina-france-qatar-b2247556.html CelsFraz (talk) 05:14, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If every official source says that the capacity was 88,966 then we will use 88,966, even if 50% of the stadium would be empty. Snowflake91 (talk) 10:41, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Per above, see WP:VNT. Bsoyka (talk) 16:05, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

only second time silver boot had more than 6 goals

The only other time the #2 scorer at the tournement had more than 6 goals was Jairzinho in 1970 also with 7. 194.102.58.6 (talk) 14:01, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok? That seems like it's not really important Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:02, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

first time defeated finalist scored 3 goals

194.102.58.6 (talk) 14:17, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Use picture of celebration like previous pictures?

Shouldn't a picture of the team celebrating be used in the lead, like previous wikipedia pages? Phillip Samuel (talk) 23:44, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If there is a freely licenced image of it, that would be acceptable. I believe we had one, but it was deleted as a copyright violation. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:04, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:07, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is French supporters gone too far?

There's a ton of news articles about the petition to rematch the final by French supporters in mesopinions.com and it gathered 200 thousand signatures from French supporters! Do anyone think that anyone gonna put this on the "Post match" section? Nobi-Wiki (talk) 03:31, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, why would we? What reason have the French supporters given for thinking the match should be replayed? They just fancy another go? – PeeJay 12:30, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Verifiability

What is the verifiability and source for this claim?

"Universally recognized as the greatest World Cup final and arguably best football game of all time due to the Hollywoodesque back and forth and intensity."

Ata1334 (talk) 02:17, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think improvements can be made to the sentence, but you can easily find countless sources claiming that this was the greatest WC final. I dont edit much, but adding some references would be good. → Call me Razr Nation 03:32, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Post-match

I was wondering is it worthible to mention in the article records which published Sundar Pichai and Mark Zuckerberg in the media:

Search recorded its highest ever traffic in 25 years during the final of #FIFAWorldCup 1, it was like the entire world was searching about one thing!

and

Leo Messi's World Cup post is now the most liked in Instagram history. WhatsApp also reached a record 25 million messages per second during the final.

At least Google Search record and Whatsapp record but I only quoted what Pichai and Zuckerberg said in publicity. Obviousy there are plenty various sources for that Dawid2009 (talk) 11:07, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

yes we should quote it hy[Ω]🐐 HyperionLEO (talk). 12:25, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:07, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

added considerably to the summary

i've added a considerably amount of detail to the summary 2001:8F8:173D:AEA6:F10E:7585:374E:E519 (talk) 08:52, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2022_FIFA_World_Cup_final&oldid=1133540321"