User talk:Abou Ben Adhem

Alani map

Could you, please, put the map of Alani migrations to http://commons.wikimedia.org, so as other language editions could use it too. Thank you for the map, it's beautiful and easy to understand. - Slavik IVANOV 03:08, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done! I've uploaded the file here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Alani_map.jpg . (I tried to do this to begin with, but couldn't figure out how to resolve the overlapping Image: and commons: namespaces.) - Abou 00:22, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Decade List template

You've been removing categories, interwiki links, and the such. Is there a reason for doing this? --Nlu (talk) 01:36, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The template Template:Decade List generates category and interwiki links automatically; so I was removing the redundant manually-entered links. Sorry; I should have explained that in the edit summaries. Abou 03:31, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

California WikiProjects

As a California Wikipedian, you may be interested in the California WikiProject (and/or one of its 'daughter' Wikiprojects on Southern California, Santa Barbara County, California State Highways and California County Routes). Please take a look at the WikiProject to see if there is anything that interests you. If you have any comments or questions, feel free to contact me. If enough people express an interest, it would also be very easy to create additional daughter WikiProjects, such as a Northern California WikiProject or a California Politics WikiProject.

It has also more than seven months since the 2nd Los Angeles area Wikipedia meetup ([ 26 September]] 2005), so it is time for another one. There have also been California meetups in San Diego (18 October 2005) and a very small one in Santa Barbara (8 April 2006. It's also about time that the Bay Area gets its first Meetup if anyone is willing to organize it. ^Blank ^Verse 06:00, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

noinclude

Any reason you've been adding no include tags articles? Jim62sch 14:27, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've written a template for use in decade articles, which aggregates the entries for the years comprising that decade into a single listing. To simplify that aggregate listing, I put noinclude tags around everything in the year articles except the actual list of events for that year. The template is currently used in the articles for the first three decades of the fifth century, but the frequency with which other editors remove the noinclude tags gives me doubts about the practicality of using this template further. Also, your splitting up of the event listings by region and topic, while a great improvement to the year articles, makes the aggregate decade listings somewhat more confusing. Abou 18:26, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Abou: Ah, I see. I couldn't find any info on noinclude tags, so while I knew the probable general purpose, I didn't know the overall purpose. If it's any consolation, I'm going to hit the decade and century articles once I get through 1000AD and add the important stuff. I realise that auto-population of fields beats manual anyday, but at least the data you want to capture will be there. Sorry if the changes I made created a problem, Take care, Jim62sch 20:42, 11 June 2006 (UTC) .[reply]

(moved from your userpage)

Dear Abou Ben Adhem,

First of all I would like to ask you to be quite polite in your suggestions and statements regarding the “probability” of the doctoral researches of the Turkist writers. Many thanks for that.

If you are not satisfied by the reference to the research of the Turkist writers, there is another one the most authoritative Russian historian Professor, Doctor E. P. Alekseeva. She is also Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Moscow). The fact that Karachays and Balkars are the linear descendants of Alans is mentioned in her book (in Russian) "Карачаевцы и балкарцы древний народ Кавказа", Москва, 1993 (“Karachays and Balkars – ancient Caucasian nations” 1993, Moscow). Electronic version of the monograph is available on-line at: http://real-alania.narod.ru/alanialand/history/page1.htm Best regards,

Kemal —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kemal09 (talk • contribs) .

Reference please

You added "educated in Africa" to Augustine of Hippo. Do you have a reference for this? My information at this point is that he was sent to and educated (our equivalent of tertiary) principally in Rome and Milan - as per the record in his "Confessio". Could you please clarify and revert my reversion by adding a citation? Cor Unum 12:15, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Augustine went to Italy as a teacher, not a student. He was educated in Madauros and Carthage, in Africa, then taught successively in Tagaste, Carthage, Rome, and Milan. From the Confessio:

"For that year were my studies intermitted: whilst after my return from Madaura (a neighbour city, whither I had journeyed to learn grammar and rhetoric), the expenses for a further journey to Carthage were being provided for me; and that rather by the resolution than the means of my father, who was but a poor freeman of Thagaste."

"In those years when I first began to teach rhetoric in my native town..."

"Thou didst deal with me, that I should be persuaded to go to Rome, and to teach there rather, what I was teaching at Carthage."

"I began then diligently to practise that for which I came to Rome, to teach rhetoric..."

--Abou 15:04, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Calm down

Be bold is the principle. My memory (having studied Augustine) was of his studies in Italy and principally the conversion in Milan of course. When I see one word added like "Africa" (and you have an African name/handle) to seemingly skew an article (without reference) and I think I know better, I sometimes revert to find out if it is a thoughtless (and hence unimportant) addition. Keeps people on their toes. I have seen a lot of axes being ground on wiki. It's part of the territory of course.

These are references you have supplied to me on my page- so why not add them as citations or footnotes? It will improve the article no end if you supply the reference. You will note I have aded quite a few to the article and it is on my watchlist. It strengthens the ability of people to corroborate.

Cor Unum 11:48, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! I just saw your Latin name/handle and figured you were a Roman trying to skew the article in favor of Italy :)

Seriously, the article could use some expansion on these points, but I was just trying to make a quick correction to a factual error in the meantime. It didn't seem significant enough or controversial enough to merit a citation in the intro paragraph.

As to strengthening the ability of people to collaborate/corroborate (whichever you meant): It would help if you raised issues like this on the article discussion page, where other editors could help verify information and incorporate it into the article. Bringing it up here suggests you see it as a personal issue that needs to be dealt with privately.

—Abou 14:44, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Honorius (emperor)

Thank you for your corrections to Honorius (emperor).--Panarjedde 12:36, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:21, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

TFD

I see that you are mostly inactive here, but I thought I had better notify you about a TFD concerning some templates you created in 2006. Regards, — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:01, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Simple Yearbox Year List 6

A tag has been placed on Template:Simple Yearbox Year List 6 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Bulwersator (talk) 14:44, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Are you still active on Wiki?

Need to discuss a problem with your Timeline on the Alans article. Thanks.HammerFilmFan (talk) 02:28, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Abou Ben Adhem. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Abou Ben Adhem. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]