User talk:Sbb1413

I used to contribute in English Wikipedia till 2021. Since then, I'm permanently banned for hate speech and now I generally contribute in Commons, English Wikivoyage and Bengali Wikipedia. Unless I can prove that I will never trigger hate speech against any community, I am unable to return. If I return, I will avoid editing redirects and articles related to China and Kashmir and focus on West Bengal and (possibly) spaceflight.

Archives:

Manually archived

Archived by ClueBot

Archived by lowercase sigmabot III

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by when more than 2 sections are present.

Unban request 8 February 2023

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sbb1413 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have already understood why I was banned by the English Wikipedia community. I was banned from the entire site for my disruptive edits, lack of competence and racism. Since then, I have attempted to reform myself in several other Wikimedia sites, including Bengali Wikipedia, Commons and Wikivoyage. After some time, some editors have commented that I have become a valuable contributor. So I think I should be unbanned in English Wikipedia and if I were unbanned, I will focus to the articles on West Bengal and possibly the whole India and avoid the areas that led me to my current situation. I may also use WP:AFC/R sparingly to create useful redirects in accordance to the relevant policies.

The above comment is to copied to an appropriate venue by an unbiased administrator. --Sbb1413 (talk) 13:58, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The consensus at WP:AN was to decline the unban request. RickinBaltimore (talk) 01:59, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm leaving this for another admin, just in case anyone claims I'm biased. However, you are free to copy the following (hopefully helpful) statement. Based on checkuser data, I see no evidence of recent block evasion for this user. --Yamla (talk) 14:01, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: is there a link to the ban discussion by any chance? RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:07, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The ban notice was added to the user page by CactiStaccingCrane. I think the most pertinent link discussing the ban is here. Let me know if you want more, happy to dive more deeply. --Yamla (talk) 18:06, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Yamla, I am going to post this request to WP:AN. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:24, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Files featured on The Downlink

A tag has been placed on Category:Files featured on The Downlink indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:10, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]