Jump to content

User talk:Trainsskyscrapers

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 2604:3d09:a980:1952:a0f0:1ce4:31f9:2197 (talk) at 01:22, 26 May 2023 (Angie Beyince: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome, Trainsskyscrapers!

A plate of chocolate chip cookies on a blue and white striped plate. The plate sits on a beige surface.
Have a plate of cookies!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Trainsskyscrapers! I'm Royal Autumn Crest, and I've been assigned as your mentor. Around 10% of new Wikipedia accounts receive a mentor randomly taken from a list of volunteers. It just means I'm here to help with anything you need! We need to have all kinds of people working together to create an online encyclopedia, so I'm glad you're here. Over time, you will figure out what you enjoy doing the most on Wikipedia.

You might have noticed that you have access to a tutorial and suggested edits. It's recommended that you take advantage of this, as it'll make learning how to edit Wikipedia easier.

If you need assistance with anything or have any questions, click on the "Get editing help" button on the bottom right corner of your screen. This will open up a module with links to help pages and a place to ask me questions. You can also ask me questions directly on my talk page, or go here to get help from the wider community.

Again, welcome to Wikipedia! Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 20:59, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much, Royal Autumn Crest!
I look forward to working alongside you. Trainsskyscrapers (talk) 21:47, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher "C4" Umana moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Christopher "C4" Umana, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. JML1148 (Talk | Contribs) 05:07, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christopher "C4" Umana (December 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 331dot was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
331dot (talk) 08:32, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Made some improvements and re-submitted the draft a few weeks ago. Thanks. Trainsskyscrapers (talk) 00:10, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Trainsskyscrapers! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 331dot (talk) 08:32, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Floyd Bentley moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Floyd Bentley, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 05:46, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Darryl Pearson (musician) moved to draftspace

Thanks for creating Darryl Pearson (musician). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and No independent notability from swing mob. Needs better sourcing that focuses on Pearson himself not the bands as a byline. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 22:07, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Darryl Pearson (musician) (January 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by TheChunky were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 17:00, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

3rd Avenue (R&B Group) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 3rd Avenue (R&B Group), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 15:52, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. It gave me time to find out more about this talented group, do additional research, find new reliable sources, and write a little about their pre-and-post group activities. Submitted my revised draft a while back. Cheers. Trainsskyscrapers (talk) 00:04, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Angie Beyince

Hey, just wanted to say that it's been fun working alongside you to get Angie a proper page lol. Can you add her name link to the info box relative section on Beyonce's page? 166.198.161.6 (talk) 17:02, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Likewise! Thank you for all of your contributions. Just added Angie to the infobox relative sections on both Beyoncé and Solange's pages, as well as those bottom-page templates for Beyoncé and Solange. Have a great week! Trainsskyscrapers (talk) 03:47, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was looking at her songwriting credits and I think you forgot to remove one of the unreleased songs, Fascination, from that section in the I Am Sasha Fierce row. It's already in the separate section you made specifically for unreleased songs. 166.198.161.70 (talk) 23:28, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up! Just removed it from the IASF row. I initially thought that based on the writing team (namely Amanda Ghost/Ian Dench) and their extensive work with Beyonce around IASF/Cadillac Records that it would be easy to assume which album sessions it came from, but I could find no cited indication other than the entry on Genius. For all you know, it could have actually been written for Solange's "Sol-Angel and the Hadley St. Dreams", which was heavily produced by Jack Splash and released a few weeks before Beyonce's. Trainsskyscrapers (talk) 00:17, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

True. I wasn't sure if you left it there on purpose or not, so I didn't want to remove it without letting you know. By the way, I don't know if you saw my edit summary about Angie's age or not but I left one just in case anyone else tries to make it 1982 again. 166.198.161.70 (talk) 14:44, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How does Angie qualify as a music executive? She isn't commonly referred to by that title in the media. And why is Mathew listed as Uncle when he and Tina are no longer married? As far as I know in laws (and in this case former in laws) and step relatives are not supposed to be listed in the infobox. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.194.204.46 (talk) 00:49, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are right about Mathew, and I will remove those shortly. As for a music executive? Definitely. From that article that was written around the surprise release of Self-Titled about Parkwood Entertainment (as well as the Harvard Business School Case), her team have the respective responsibilities (and budgets) of an executive at a major label, but simply don't have underlings who report to them. The structure and culture are different. 2604:3D09:A980:1952:A0F0:1CE4:31F9:2197 (talk) 01:22, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carter Lang has been accepted

Carter Lang, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:53, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Just wanted to take this opportunity to say thank you.

It hasn't gone unnoticed that you have been creating songwriter/producer pages and adding links to relevant articles. Keep up the good work!

>> Lil-unique1 (talk)10:08, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I appreciate it. It's been fun getting back into the swing of things on here.
Cheers! Trainsskyscrapers (talk) 21:58, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christopher Umana (February 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Twinkle1990 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Twinkle1990 (talk) 14:40, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Darryl Pearson (musician) (February 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Twinkle1990 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Twinkle1990 (talk) 06:08, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for reviewing this page! After some tweaks, there are new/additional sources regarding a potential solo music career/recording deal with a major label, his short-lived side-venture as one part of an R&B duo that appeared on a blockbuster soundtrack album, label A&R work, expanded discography, and more info about his creation of several major Billboard Chart hits, etc. It is now about to reach 40 reputable, valid sources, and his story is definitely notable enough now to qualify. Re-submitted a few days ago. Trainsskyscrapers (talk) 17:44, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ThankGod4Cody has been accepted

ThankGod4Cody, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Twinkle1990 (talk) 09:13, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 3rd Avenue (R&B Group) (March 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
CNMall41 (talk) 06:12, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christopher Umana (March 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Jamiebuba (talk) 18:25, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Floyd Bentley (April 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 16:57, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Floyd Bentley (May 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eternal Shadow was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Eternal Shadow Talk 00:14, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:3rd Avenue - Let's Talk About Love (Album Cover).webp

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:3rd Avenue - Let's Talk About Love (Album Cover).webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:01, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:3rdAvenue Photoshoot.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:3rdAvenue Photoshoot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:02, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feli Ferraro moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Feli Ferraro, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 12:00, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate this, as she is a fairly-new songwriter set to appear on several major label albums this year. Hopefully more will be written about her songwriting contributions from reliable sources, and she will at least be nominated for a few songwriting awards for the hits she has already written on this year so I can resubmit. Thanks. Trainsskyscrapers (talk) 13:38, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]