Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 August 3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Izno (talk | contribs) at 05:09, 11 August 2023 (Template:National Wrestling Alliance personnel: Closed as delete (XFDcloser)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:38, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Outdated navbox as all the coaches for the teams are now part of the United Athletic Conference. A navbox for the UAC is used on articles linked on this navbox. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:18, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. plicit 23:39, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused ref template. Was used on one article and remains the only article it was used on, George's Creek and Cumberland Railroad. But is now in text format. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:14, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@WikiCleanerMan also on Western Maryland Railway; funnily enough I was responsible for removing it during copyvio cleanup: [1]. Anyway, it now has 32 transclusions. Thanks for the nudge. Mackensen (talk) 18:24, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as it is now used. Gonnym (talk) 10:36, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as now used. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:50, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 05:09, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The main article was deleted due to lack of sources. [2] HHH Pedrigree (talk) 11:06, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. All non-personal related links should be in Template:National Wrestling Alliance. Gonnym (talk) 13:30, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:52, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused latest software release templates. Gonnym (talk) 07:26, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:53, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be a duplicate of Category:Ireland political party shading templates, maybe created by accident. Gonnym (talk) 07:23, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 07:12, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Categories this was used on were deleted. Gonnym (talk) 06:56, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 07:12, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template created by a now site banned editor. Gonnym (talk) 06:42, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. plicit 00:20, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:15, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 00:20, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

One link, unused, and non-winning team. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:10, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 00:20, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not needed as we already have a template for this subject. Template:Socialist Workers Party. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:10, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 00:20, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No longer needed after it was blanked for being outdated. The roster on the mainspace only has a few links making a navbox not needed. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:08, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak delete looking at the roster for the most recent season (Bendigo Spirit#Current roster), there are 4 notable players, so this template could have 4 blue links. Which is close to being enough for a template, but there's no evidence that those players will necessarily play next season (2023-24), and the template risks getting outdated and thus useless/incorrect again. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:15, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 00:20, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A massive pile of red links. Only one blue link. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:06, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).